linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, ira.weiny@intel.com,
	vishal.l.verma@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cxl/mem: Fix cdev_device_add() error handling
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:11:26 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210325171126.GD2356281@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161661971651.1721612.7457823773061754064.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 02:01:56PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> If cdev_device_add() fails then the allocation performed by
> dev_set_name() is leaked. Use put_device(), not open coded release, for
> device_add() failures.
> 
> The comment is obsolete because direct err_id failures need not worry
> about the device being live.
> 
> The release method expects the percpu_ref is already dead, so
> percpu_ref_kill() is needed before put_device(). However, given that the
> cdev was partially live wait_for_completion() also belongs in the
> release method.
> 
> Fixes: b39cb1052a5c ("cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices")
> Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>  drivers/cxl/mem.c |   16 ++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> index 30bf4f0f3c17..e53d573ae4ab 100644
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> @@ -1049,6 +1049,7 @@ static void cxl_memdev_release(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(dev);
>  
> +	wait_for_completion(&cxlmd->ops_dead);

This only works because the fops stuff is not right, a kref shouldn't
have a completion like this.

Also, don't use devm for unregister. That just makes it extra-hard to
write the driver remove function correctly.

> @@ -1157,7 +1158,6 @@ static void cxlmdev_unregister(void *_cxlmd)
>  
>  	percpu_ref_kill(&cxlmd->ops_active);
>  	cdev_device_del(&cxlmd->cdev, dev);
> -	wait_for_completion(&cxlmd->ops_dead);
>  	cxlmd->cxlm = NULL;
>  	put_device(dev);
>  }
> @@ -1210,20 +1210,16 @@ static int cxl_mem_add_memdev(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
>  	cdev_init(cdev, &cxl_memdev_fops);
>  
>  	rc = cdev_device_add(cdev, dev);
> -	if (rc)
> -		goto err_add;
> +	if (rc) {
> +		percpu_ref_kill(&cxlmd->ops_active);
> +		put_device(dev);

This must be one high performance ioctl to warrant the percpu ref.. If
it is not high performance use a rwsem, otherwise I'd suggest srcu as
a faster/simpler alternative.

This is a use-after-free:

static long cxl_memdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
			     unsigned long arg)
{
	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
	struct inode *inode;
	int rc = -ENOTTY;

	inode = file_inode(file);
	cxlmd = container_of(inode->i_cdev, typeof(*cxlmd), cdev);
       ^^^^^ can be freed memory

ioctl needs to store the cxlmd in file->private_data and
open()/release() need to do get/put device on it so the memory stays
around. This is why open gets the inode as an argument and ioctl/etc
does not.

The ordering cxlmdev_unregister should mirror the ordering in create
so cdev_device_del should be first

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-25 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24 21:01 [PATCH 0/4] cxl/mem: Fix memdev device setup Dan Williams
2021-03-24 21:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] cxl/mem: Use sysfs_emit() for attribute show routines Dan Williams
2021-03-25 16:49   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-24 21:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] cxl/mem: Fix cdev_device_add() error handling Dan Williams
2021-03-25 17:11   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-03-29 21:03     ` Dan Williams
2021-03-29 22:44       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30  4:48         ` Dan Williams
2021-03-24 21:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] cxl/mem: Do not rely on device_add() side effects for dev_set_name() failures Dan Williams
2021-03-25 17:14   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-24 21:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] cxl/mem: Disable cxl device power management Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210325171126.GD2356281@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).