linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	<lukasz.luba@arm.com>, <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	<f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>,
	<thara.gopinath@linaro.org>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	<souvik.chakravarty@arm.com>, Jyoti Bhayana <jbhayana@google.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	<linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 25/38] iio/scmi: port driver to the new scmi_sensor_proto_ops interface
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:33:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210330123325.00000456@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210316124903.35011-26-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:48:50 +0000
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> wrote:

> Port driver to the new SCMI Sensor interface based on protocol handles
> and common devm_get_ops().
> 
> Cc: Jyoti Bhayana <jbhayana@google.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>

+CC linux-iio@vger.kernel.org

Rule of thumb if it doesn't go there it ends up in randomly location based
on other lists and I might not see it for a few weeks :(

> ---
>  drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c | 91 ++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c b/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c
> index 872d87ca6256..b4bdc3f3a946 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c
> @@ -21,8 +21,10 @@
>  
>  #define SCMI_IIO_NUM_OF_AXIS 3
>  
> +static const struct scmi_sensor_proto_ops *sensor_ops;

Hmm.   I'm not keen on globals when they really should not be necessary.
They just result in lifetimes being out of sync.  Here you are fine because
you set it to an appropriate value as the first thing you do in probe, and
I assume the function only ever returns on answer on repeated calls.

Why not put a copy of that pointer inside the struct scmi_iio_priv structures?

Otherwise this all looks like straight forward refactoring so given the
above is more a 'bad smell' than a bug and I'm rather late to the game.

Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>


> +
>  struct scmi_iio_priv {
> -	struct scmi_handle *handle;
> +	struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph;
>  	const struct scmi_sensor_info *sensor_info;
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>  	/* adding one additional channel for timestamp */
> @@ -82,7 +84,6 @@ static int scmi_iio_sensor_update_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  static int scmi_iio_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *iio_dev)
>  {
>  	struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> -	u32 sensor_id = sensor->sensor_info->id;
>  	u32 sensor_config = 0;
>  	int err;
>  
> @@ -92,27 +93,11 @@ static int scmi_iio_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *iio_dev)
>  
>  	sensor_config |= FIELD_PREP(SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_ENABLED_MASK,
>  				    SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_ENABLE);
> -
> -	err = sensor->handle->notify_ops->register_event_notifier(sensor->handle,
> -			SCMI_PROTOCOL_SENSOR, SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE,
> -			&sensor_id, &sensor->sensor_update_nb);
> -	if (err) {
> -		dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
> -			"Error in registering sensor update notifier for sensor %s err %d",
> -			sensor->sensor_info->name, err);
> -		return err;
> -	}
> -
> -	err = sensor->handle->sensor_ops->config_set(sensor->handle,
> -			sensor->sensor_info->id, sensor_config);
> -	if (err) {
> -		sensor->handle->notify_ops->unregister_event_notifier(sensor->handle,
> -				SCMI_PROTOCOL_SENSOR,
> -				SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE, &sensor_id,
> -				&sensor->sensor_update_nb);
> +	err = sensor_ops->config_set(sensor->ph, sensor->sensor_info->id,
> +				     sensor_config);
> +	if (err)
>  		dev_err(&iio_dev->dev, "Error in enabling sensor %s err %d",
>  			sensor->sensor_info->name, err);
> -	}
>  
>  	return err;
>  }
> @@ -120,25 +105,13 @@ static int scmi_iio_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *iio_dev)
>  static int scmi_iio_buffer_postdisable(struct iio_dev *iio_dev)
>  {
>  	struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> -	u32 sensor_id = sensor->sensor_info->id;
>  	u32 sensor_config = 0;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	sensor_config |= FIELD_PREP(SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_ENABLED_MASK,
>  				    SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_DISABLE);
> -
> -	err = sensor->handle->notify_ops->unregister_event_notifier(sensor->handle,
> -			SCMI_PROTOCOL_SENSOR, SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE,
> -			&sensor_id, &sensor->sensor_update_nb);
> -	if (err) {
> -		dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
> -			"Error in unregistering sensor update notifier for sensor %s err %d",
> -			sensor->sensor_info->name, err);
> -		return err;
> -	}
> -
> -	err = sensor->handle->sensor_ops->config_set(sensor->handle, sensor_id,
> -						     sensor_config);
> +	err = sensor_ops->config_set(sensor->ph, sensor->sensor_info->id,
> +				     sensor_config);
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
>  			"Error in disabling sensor %s with err %d",
> @@ -161,8 +134,8 @@ static int scmi_iio_set_odr_val(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int val, int val2)
>  	u32 sensor_config;
>  	char buf[32];
>  
> -	int err = sensor->handle->sensor_ops->config_get(sensor->handle,
> -			sensor->sensor_info->id, &sensor_config);
> +	int err = sensor_ops->config_get(sensor->ph, sensor->sensor_info->id,
> +					 &sensor_config);
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
>  			"Error in getting sensor config for sensor %s err %d",
> @@ -208,8 +181,8 @@ static int scmi_iio_set_odr_val(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int val, int val2)
>  	sensor_config |=
>  		FIELD_PREP(SCMI_SENS_CFG_ROUND_MASK, SCMI_SENS_CFG_ROUND_AUTO);
>  
> -	err = sensor->handle->sensor_ops->config_set(sensor->handle,
> -			sensor->sensor_info->id, sensor_config);
> +	err = sensor_ops->config_set(sensor->ph, sensor->sensor_info->id,
> +				     sensor_config);
>  	if (err)
>  		dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
>  			"Error in setting sensor update interval for sensor %s value %u err %d",
> @@ -274,8 +247,8 @@ static int scmi_iio_get_odr_val(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int *val, int *val2)
>  	u32 sensor_config;
>  	int mult;
>  
> -	int err = sensor->handle->sensor_ops->config_get(sensor->handle,
> -			sensor->sensor_info->id, &sensor_config);
> +	int err = sensor_ops->config_get(sensor->ph, sensor->sensor_info->id,
> +					 &sensor_config);
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
>  			"Error in getting sensor config for sensor %s err %d",
> @@ -542,15 +515,17 @@ static int scmi_iio_buffers_setup(struct iio_dev *scmi_iiodev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static struct iio_dev *scmi_alloc_iiodev(struct device *dev,
> -					 struct scmi_handle *handle,
> -					 const struct scmi_sensor_info *sensor_info)
> +static struct iio_dev *
> +scmi_alloc_iiodev(struct scmi_device *sdev, struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> +		  const struct scmi_sensor_info *sensor_info)
>  {
>  	struct iio_chan_spec *iio_channels;
>  	struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor;
>  	enum iio_modifier modifier;
>  	enum iio_chan_type type;
>  	struct iio_dev *iiodev;
> +	struct device *dev = &sdev->dev;
> +	const struct scmi_handle *handle = sdev->handle;
>  	int i, ret;
>  
>  	iiodev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*sensor));
> @@ -560,7 +535,7 @@ static struct iio_dev *scmi_alloc_iiodev(struct device *dev,
>  	iiodev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>  	iiodev->dev.parent = dev;
>  	sensor = iio_priv(iiodev);
> -	sensor->handle = handle;
> +	sensor->ph = ph;
>  	sensor->sensor_info = sensor_info;
>  	sensor->sensor_update_nb.notifier_call = scmi_iio_sensor_update_cb;
>  	sensor->indio_dev = iiodev;
> @@ -595,6 +570,17 @@ static struct iio_dev *scmi_alloc_iiodev(struct device *dev,
>  					  sensor_info->axis[i].id);
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = handle->notify_ops->devm_event_notifier_register(sdev,
> +				SCMI_PROTOCOL_SENSOR, SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE,
> +				&sensor->sensor_info->id,
> +				&sensor->sensor_update_nb);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&iiodev->dev,
> +			"Error in registering sensor update notifier for sensor %s err %d",
> +			sensor->sensor_info->name, ret);
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +	}
> +
>  	scmi_iio_set_timestamp_channel(&iio_channels[i], i);
>  	iiodev->channels = iio_channels;
>  	return iiodev;
> @@ -604,24 +590,29 @@ static int scmi_iio_dev_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
>  {
>  	const struct scmi_sensor_info *sensor_info;
>  	struct scmi_handle *handle = sdev->handle;
> +	struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph;
>  	struct device *dev = &sdev->dev;
>  	struct iio_dev *scmi_iio_dev;
>  	u16 nr_sensors;
>  	int err = -ENODEV, i;
>  
> -	if (!handle || !handle->sensor_ops) {
> +	if (!handle)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	sensor_ops = handle->devm_protocol_get(sdev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_SENSOR, &ph);
> +	if (IS_ERR(sensor_ops)) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "SCMI device has no sensor interface\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		return PTR_ERR(sensor_ops);
>  	}
>  
> -	nr_sensors = handle->sensor_ops->count_get(handle);
> +	nr_sensors = sensor_ops->count_get(ph);
>  	if (!nr_sensors) {
>  		dev_dbg(dev, "0 sensors found via SCMI bus\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_sensors; i++) {
> -		sensor_info = handle->sensor_ops->info_get(handle, i);
> +		sensor_info = sensor_ops->info_get(ph, i);
>  		if (!sensor_info) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "SCMI sensor %d has missing info\n", i);
>  			return -EINVAL;
> @@ -636,7 +627,7 @@ static int scmi_iio_dev_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
>  		    sensor_info->axis[0].type != RADIANS_SEC)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		scmi_iio_dev = scmi_alloc_iiodev(dev, handle, sensor_info);
> +		scmi_iio_dev = scmi_alloc_iiodev(sdev, ph, sensor_info);
>  		if (IS_ERR(scmi_iio_dev)) {
>  			dev_err(dev,
>  				"failed to allocate IIO device for sensor %s: %ld\n",


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-30 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-16 12:48 [PATCH v7 00/38] SCMI vendor protocols and modularization Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 01/38] firmware: arm_scmi: review protocol registration interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 02/38] firmware: arm_scmi: introduce protocol handle definitions Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 03/38] firmware: arm_scmi: introduce devres get/put protocols operations Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 04/38] firmware: arm_scmi: make notifications aware of protocols users Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 05/38] firmware: arm_scmi: introduce new devres notification ops Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 06/38] firmware: arm_scmi: refactor events registration Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 07/38] firmware: arm_scmi: convert events registration to protocol handles Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 08/38] firmware: arm_scmi: add new protocol handle core xfer ops Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 09/38] firmware: arm_scmi: add helper to access revision area memory Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 10/38] firmware: arm_scmi: port Base protocol to new interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 11/38] firmware: arm_scmi: port Perf protocol to new protocols interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 12/38] cpufreq: scmi: port driver to the new scmi_perf_proto_ops interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 13/38] firmware: arm_scmi: remove legacy scmi_perf_ops protocol interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 14/38] firmware: arm_scmi: port Power protocol to new protocols interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 15/38] firmware: arm_scmi: port GenPD driver to the new scmi_power_proto_ops interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 16/38] firmware: arm_scmi: remove legacy scmi_power_ops protocol interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 17/38] firmware: arm_scmi: port Clock protocol to new protocols interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 18/38] clk: scmi: port driver to the new scmi_clk_proto_ops interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-23  9:46   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-03-26  0:08   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-26 11:02     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-03-26 13:28     ` [PATCH v8 " Cristian Marussi
2021-03-26 18:15       ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 19/38] firmware: arm_scmi: remove legacy scmi_clk_ops protocol interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 20/38] firmware: arm_scmi: port Reset protocol to new protocols interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 21/38] reset: reset-scmi: port driver to the new scmi_reset_proto_ops interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 22/38] firmware: arm_scmi: remove legacy scmi_reset_ops protocol interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 23/38] firmware: arm_scmi: port Sensor protocol to new protocols interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 24/38] hwmon: (scmi) port driver to the new scmi_sensor_proto_ops interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 25/38] iio/scmi: " Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 17:51   ` Jyoti Bhayana
2021-03-16 22:22     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-03-17  5:38       ` Jyoti Bhayana
2021-03-18 12:12         ` Sudeep Holla
2021-03-19 17:00           ` Jyoti Bhayana
2021-03-23  9:48           ` Sudeep Holla
2021-03-30 11:22             ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-03-30 11:33   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-03-30 12:51     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-03-30 17:34       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-03-31  8:32         ` Cristian Marussi
2021-03-31 12:28           ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-03-30 13:47     ` [PATCH v8 25/38] iio/scmi: Port " Cristian Marussi
2021-03-30 17:40       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 26/38] firmware: arm_scmi: remove legacy scmi_sensor_ops protocol interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 27/38] firmware: arm_scmi: port SystemPower protocol to new protocols interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 28/38] firmware: arm_scmi: port Voltage " Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 29/38] regulator: scmi: port driver to the new scmi_voltage_proto_ops interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 30/38] firmware: arm_scmi: remove legacy scmi_voltage_ops protocol interface Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 31/38] firmware: arm_scmi: make references to handle const Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 32/38] firmware: arm_scmi: cleanup legacy protocol init code Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 33/38] firmware: arm_scmi: cleanup unused core xfer wrappers Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:48 ` [PATCH v7 34/38] firmware: arm_scmi: cleanup events registration transient code Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:49 ` [PATCH v7 35/38] firmware: arm_scmi: make notify_priv really private Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:49 ` [PATCH v7 36/38] firmware: arm_scmi: rename non devres notify_ops Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:49 ` [PATCH v7 37/38] firmware: arm_scmi: add protocol modularization support Cristian Marussi
2021-03-16 12:49 ` [PATCH v7 38/38] firmware: arm_scmi: add dynamic scmi devices creation Cristian Marussi
2021-03-26  4:09 ` [PATCH v7 00/38] SCMI vendor protocols and modularization Florian Fainelli
2021-03-26 11:04   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-03-31  8:22 ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210330123325.00000456@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jbhayana@google.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=thara.gopinath@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).