From: Kevin Paul Herbert <kph@platinasystems.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Tom Grennan <tgrennan@platinasystems.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] nvmem: Change to unified property interface
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:18:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210330161814.3144336-1-kph@platinasystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210329223827.2851916-1-kph@platinasystems.com>
nvmem: Change to unified property interface
Change from using device tree (Open Firmware) APIs to the unified
'fwnode' interface.
Change of_nvmem_cell_get() to fwnode_nvmem_cell_get(), and add a
wrapper for of_nvmem_cell_get().
Change of_nvmem_device_get() to fwnode_nvmem_device_get(). There
are no known accessors to the OF interface, so no need for a wrapper.
The first version of this patch incorrectly had a wrapper for
of_nvmem_device_get(), even though the comments about the patch
not needing this were correct.
The second version of this patch had an incorrect return type for
of_nvmem_device_get().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-30 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-29 22:38 [PATCH] nvmem: Change to unified property interface Kevin Paul Herbert
2021-03-30 3:21 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-30 4:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Kevin Paul Herbert
2021-03-30 4:28 ` Kevin Paul Herbert
2021-03-30 4:34 ` Kevin Paul Herbert
2021-03-30 4:57 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
2021-03-30 10:43 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-30 16:18 ` Kevin Paul Herbert [this message]
2021-03-30 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Kevin Paul Herbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210330161814.3144336-1-kph@platinasystems.com \
--to=kph@platinasystems.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tgrennan@platinasystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).