From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46246C43460 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232A56139B for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245365AbhDFLLq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 07:11:46 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49644 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233834AbhDFLLe (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 07:11:34 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863EAB156; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:11:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Oscar Salvador To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Hildenbrand , Michal Hocko , Anshuman Khandual , Pavel Tatashin , Vlastimil Babka , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador Subject: [PATCH v6 1/8] drivers/base/memory: Introduce memory_block_{online,offline} Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:11:08 +0200 Message-Id: <20210406111115.8953-2-osalvador@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20210406111115.8953-1-osalvador@suse.de> References: <20210406111115.8953-1-osalvador@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is a preparatory patch that introduces two new functions: memory_block_online() and memory_block_offline(). For now, these functions will only call online_pages() and offline_pages() respectively, but they will be later in charge of preparing the vmemmap pages, carrying out the initialization and proper accounting of such pages. Since memory_block struct contains all the information, pass this struct down the chain till the end functions. Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand --- drivers/base/memory.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c index f35298425575..f209925a5d4e 100644 --- a/drivers/base/memory.c +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c @@ -169,30 +169,41 @@ int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v) return blocking_notifier_call_chain(&memory_chain, val, v); } +static int memory_block_online(struct memory_block *mem) +{ + unsigned long start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr); + unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block; + + return online_pages(start_pfn, nr_pages, mem->online_type, mem->nid); +} + +static int memory_block_offline(struct memory_block *mem) +{ + unsigned long start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr); + unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block; + + return offline_pages(start_pfn, nr_pages); +} + /* * MEMORY_HOTPLUG depends on SPARSEMEM in mm/Kconfig, so it is * OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here. */ static int -memory_block_action(unsigned long start_section_nr, unsigned long action, - int online_type, int nid) +memory_block_action(struct memory_block *mem, unsigned long action) { - unsigned long start_pfn; - unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block; int ret; - start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(start_section_nr); - switch (action) { case MEM_ONLINE: - ret = online_pages(start_pfn, nr_pages, online_type, nid); + ret = memory_block_online(mem); break; case MEM_OFFLINE: - ret = offline_pages(start_pfn, nr_pages); + ret = memory_block_offline(mem); break; default: WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%ld, %ld) unknown action: " - "%ld\n", __func__, start_section_nr, action, action); + "%ld\n", __func__, mem->start_section_nr, action, action); ret = -EINVAL; } @@ -210,9 +221,7 @@ static int memory_block_change_state(struct memory_block *mem, if (to_state == MEM_OFFLINE) mem->state = MEM_GOING_OFFLINE; - ret = memory_block_action(mem->start_section_nr, to_state, - mem->online_type, mem->nid); - + ret = memory_block_action(mem, to_state); mem->state = ret ? from_state_req : to_state; return ret; -- 2.16.3