linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang3@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFT PATCH] riscv: mremap speedup - enable HAVE_MOVE_PUD and HAVE_MOVE_PMD
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 00:37:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210417003539.5bceabc2@xhacker> (raw)

From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>

HAVE_MOVE_PUD enables remapping pages at the PUD level if both the source
and destination addresses are PUD-aligned.
HAVE_MOVE_PMD does similar speedup on the PMD level.

With HAVE_MOVE_PUD enabled, there is about a 143x improvement on qemu
With HAVE_MOVE_PMD enabled, there is about a 5x improvement on qemu

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
---
Hi all,

After reading the risc-v privileged spec, I think it's safe to support
the HAVE_MOVE_PUD and HAVE_MOVE_PMD optimization on riscv. The patch passed
the mremap_test on QEMU. However this can't be tested on real HW due to lack
of HW boards, this is the reason why I mark this patch as RFT. I hope I can
buy a sipeed Allwiner D1 SoC powered SBC soon, at least I can test
HAVE_MOVE_PMD. Helping me to test on real HW is appreciated!

Thanks

 arch/riscv/Kconfig               |  2 ++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index e8074d248457..37660de68b00 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ config RISCV
 	select HAVE_KPROBES
 	select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
 	select HAVE_KRETPROBES
+	select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
+	select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
 	select HAVE_PCI
 	select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
 	select HAVE_PERF_REGS
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index ebf817c1bdf4..287733b95d10 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -360,6 +360,18 @@ static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	set_pte(ptep, pteval);
 }
 
+static inline void set_pmd_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
+			      pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd)
+{
+	set_pmd(pmdp, pmd);
+}
+
+static inline void set_pud_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
+			      pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud)
+{
+	set_pud(pudp, pud);
+}
+
 static inline void pte_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
 {
-- 
2.31.0



             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16 16:37 Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2021-05-22 15:58 ` [RFT PATCH] riscv: mremap speedup - enable HAVE_MOVE_PUD and HAVE_MOVE_PMD Palmer Dabbelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210417003539.5bceabc2@xhacker \
    --to=jszhang3@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).