linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.stultz@linaro.org,
	sboyd@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, Mark.Rutland@arm.com,
	maz@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, neeraju@codeaurora.org,
	ak@linux.intel.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 clocksource 2/6] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:52:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210419045300.596332-2-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210419045155.GA596058@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

When the clocksource watchdog marks a clock as unstable, this might
be due to that clock being unstable or it might be due to delays that
happen to occur between the reads of the two clocks.  Yes, interrupts are
disabled across those two reads, but there are no shortage of things that
can delay interrupts-disabled regions of code ranging from SMI handlers
to vCPU preemption.  It would be good to have some indication as to why
the clock was marked unstable.

Therefore, re-read the watchdog clock on either side of the read
from the clock under test.  If the watchdog clock shows an excessive
time delta between its pair of reads, the reads are retried.  The
maximum number of retries is specified by a new kernel boot parameter
clocksource.max_read_retries, which defaults to three, that is, up to four
reads, one initial and up to three retries.  If more than one retry was
required, a message is printed on the console (the occasional single retry
is expected behavior, especially in guest OSes).  If the maximum number
of retries is exceeded, the clock under test will be marked unstable.
However, the probability of this happening due to various sorts of
delays is quite small.  In addition, the reason (clock-read delays)
for the unstable marking will be apparent.

Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
[ paulmck: Per-clocksource retries per Neeraj Upadhyay feedback. ]
[ paulmck: Don't reset injectfail per Neeraj Upadhyay feedback. ]
[ paulmck: Apply Thomas Gleixner feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  6 +++
 kernel/time/clocksource.c                     | 53 ++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 4a372037b49f..7fff95bd5504 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -599,6 +599,12 @@
 			will be five delay-free reads followed by three
 			delayed reads.
 
+	clocksource.max_read_retries= [KNL]
+			Number of clocksource_watchdog() retries due to
+			external delays before the clock will be marked
+			unstable.  Defaults to three retries, that is,
+			four attempts to read the clock under test.
+
 	clearcpuid=BITNUM[,BITNUM...] [X86]
 			Disable CPUID feature X for the kernel. See
 			arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h for the valid bit
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
index d77700c45f4e..facce83fcb4a 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
@@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ static void __clocksource_change_rating(struct clocksource *cs, int rating);
 #define WATCHDOG_INTERVAL (HZ >> 1)
 #define WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD (NSEC_PER_SEC >> 4)
 
+/*
+ * Maximum permissible delay between two readouts of the watchdog
+ * clocksource surrounding a read of the clocksource being validated.
+ * This delay could be due to SMIs, NMIs, or to VCPU preemptions.
+ */
+#define WATCHDOG_MAX_SKEW (100 * NSEC_PER_USEC)
+
 static void clocksource_watchdog_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	/*
@@ -189,6 +196,8 @@ static ulong inject_delay_period;
 module_param(inject_delay_period, ulong, 0644);
 static ulong inject_delay_repeat = 1;
 module_param(inject_delay_repeat, ulong, 0644);
+static ulong max_read_retries = 3;
+module_param(max_read_retries, ulong, 0644);
 
 static void clocksource_watchdog_inject_delay(void)
 {
@@ -206,12 +215,42 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog_inject_delay(void)
 	invocations++;
 }
 
+static bool cs_watchdog_read(struct clocksource *cs, u64 *csnow, u64 *wdnow)
+{
+	unsigned int nretries;
+	u64 wd_end, wd_delta;
+	int64_t wd_delay;
+
+	for (nretries = 0; nretries <= max_read_retries; nretries++) {
+		local_irq_disable();
+		*wdnow = watchdog->read(watchdog);
+		clocksource_watchdog_inject_delay();
+		*csnow = cs->read(cs);
+		wd_end = watchdog->read(watchdog);
+		local_irq_enable();
+
+		wd_delta = clocksource_delta(wd_end, *wdnow, watchdog->mask);
+		wd_delay = clocksource_cyc2ns(wd_delta, watchdog->mult, watchdog->shift);
+		if (wd_delay <= WATCHDOG_MAX_SKEW) {
+			if (nretries > 1 || nretries >= max_read_retries) {
+				pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: %s retried %d times before success\n",
+					smp_processor_id(), watchdog->name, nretries);
+			}
+			return true;
+		}
+	}
+
+	pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: %s read-back delay of %lldns, attempt %d, marking unstable\n",
+		smp_processor_id(), watchdog->name, wd_delay, nretries);
+	return false;
+}
+
 static void clocksource_watchdog(struct timer_list *unused)
 {
-	struct clocksource *cs;
 	u64 csnow, wdnow, cslast, wdlast, delta;
-	int64_t wd_nsec, cs_nsec;
 	int next_cpu, reset_pending;
+	int64_t wd_nsec, cs_nsec;
+	struct clocksource *cs;
 
 	spin_lock(&watchdog_lock);
 	if (!watchdog_running)
@@ -228,11 +267,11 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(struct timer_list *unused)
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		local_irq_disable();
-		csnow = cs->read(cs);
-		clocksource_watchdog_inject_delay();
-		wdnow = watchdog->read(watchdog);
-		local_irq_enable();
+		if (!cs_watchdog_read(cs, &csnow, &wdnow)) {
+			/* Clock readout unreliable, so give it up. */
+			__clocksource_unstable(cs);
+			continue;
+		}
 
 		/* Clocksource initialized ? */
 		if (!(cs->flags & CLOCK_SOURCE_WATCHDOG) ||
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-19  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-19  4:51 [PATCH v9 clocksource 0/6] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-19  4:52 ` [PATCH v9 clocksource 1/6] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-19  4:52 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-04-19  4:52 ` [PATCH v9 clocksource 3/6] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-19  4:52 ` [PATCH v9 clocksource 4/6] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-19  4:52 ` [PATCH v9 clocksource 5/6] clocksource: Limit number of CPUs checked for clock synchronization Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-19  4:53 ` [PATCH v9 clocksource 6/6] clocksource: Reduce WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210419045300.596332-2-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v9 clocksource 2/6] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).