From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B601EC433ED for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B5061077 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237730AbhDSHXv (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:23:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36256 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237703AbhDSHXu (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:23:50 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EECEFC061760 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id a4so32834031wrr.2 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:23:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=MwIN+TU+KqrTV8oEDf/hF37W/wlPfyPFBOGXtanMm7A=; b=mvKP3FYTQyjhiyXdbsSScTdmxz1JdALtfbp3+iAG13OF6eHuyLflOnEhKZqi7NefnI Ka/vu+MRQlQLQ1Wf8/dEGDJ25gGU2a9Ch58/yIKB1ny09smf3tC56NSGVJxWDjaddEs4 Jtv6Lca8f3LeUYHLqp0B13sEJD2noyBhtVawAlQZHkk0XqI2Y3I6InNVrmlEQL9Jvt0h UiPhiEP4s2/GdqC8vmMETym4jlcdSAg2pfw+C/ijAxND3z+bkfIJsA4Y6/MYL8RuniMj cCEfJuyRjbQ8oJdvPaiAlSczpYRofo47AY6e21JwaRmJnDLkoT2ICuJLVknjcDEf5JyW s4sg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=MwIN+TU+KqrTV8oEDf/hF37W/wlPfyPFBOGXtanMm7A=; b=ZWYF0bRTcTpjyq1/OnhY0YssHmeMP5Ig5VFSZMS1GrNOHvucrpGPIG3wMDyGRUe4np yiA9Y2DVEViMQsAVQ23LJqWk4yqXFFnF01e4CAN8ZcEpDBwv/RpSsE4vYuAymYXWtfPQ qivIbKB2jVhip8CYwNLYtEufsUAtWxnuT5920S9uIy+yHfnkbNsWt4h7m9xJJyh60guc +IWLK/nVWgJFGHKcy/I97HfLPkU7hVXmwHlQgaWUGq0Y+8aLdBgT74MCoa5363qb6yRu clltDexmcqxi10eLKzUqYWjI29Lkvzc4BYE8rouasNqVxCzJG03/fmeMJbjGmSlk4W8R v1FA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HXTqHudDIvbTpDzEv8jKwKWGvvulzD53AAqOqBwtdlQz/66yE A3ff7uawIGf1uxfziCEZL3gIZQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxU4UayMloZjPVsgjxamNBwWhUQHvtZnZx6PsAQFTcukFY8alah33zSIRsDldU+wQ0gpgaz6A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:bbd2:: with SMTP id z18mr12686252wrg.274.1618816999770; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.215]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a22sm20364077wrc.59.2021.04.19.00.23.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:23:17 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: ChiYuan Huang Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, Mark Brown , Daniel Thompson , jingoohan1@gmail.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, lkml , ChiYuan Huang Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mfd: rt4831: Adds support for Richtek RT4831 Message-ID: <20210419072317.GB4869@dell> References: <1616945059-8718-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com> <20210419072229.GA4869@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210419072229.GA4869@dell> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, ChiYuan Huang wrote: > > > Hi, Linux mfd reviewers: > > It's been three weeks not to get any response from you. > > Is there something wrong about this mfd patch? > > If yes, please feel free to let me know. > > Couple of things: > > First, if you think a patch had fallen through the gaps, which does > happen sometimes, it is generally considered acceptable to submit a > [RESEND] ~2 weeks after the initial submission. FYI: This was such a > patch. It was not on, or had fallen off of my radar for some reason. > > Secondly, we are really late in the release cycle. -rc8 has just been > released. Quite a few maintainers slow down at ~-rc6. Particularly > for new drivers. > > No need to resubmit this driver this time. It is now on my to-review > list and I will tend to it shortly. > > Thanks for your patience. Also you are missing a DT review on patch 4. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog