From: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Add ddw_property_create() and refactor enable_ddw()
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:07:18 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422070721.463912-7-leobras.c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210422070721.463912-1-leobras.c@gmail.com>
Code used to create a ddw property that was previously scattered in
enable_ddw() is now gathered in ddw_property_create(), which deals with
allocation and filling the property, letting it ready for
of_property_add(), which now occurs in sequence.
This created an opportunity to reorganize the second part of enable_ddw():
Without this patch enable_ddw() does, in order:
kzalloc() property & members, create_ddw(), fill ddwprop inside property,
ddw_list_new_entry(), do tce_setrange_multi_pSeriesLP_walk in all memory,
of_add_property(), and list_add().
With this patch enable_ddw() does, in order:
create_ddw(), ddw_property_create(), of_add_property(),
ddw_list_new_entry(), do tce_setrange_multi_pSeriesLP_walk in all memory,
and list_add().
This change requires of_remove_property() in case anything fails after
of_add_property(), but we get to do tce_setrange_multi_pSeriesLP_walk
in all memory, which looks the most expensive operation, only if
everything else succeeds.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
index 955cf095416c..48c029386d94 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
@@ -1122,6 +1122,35 @@ static void reset_dma_window(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *par_dn)
ret);
}
+static struct property *ddw_property_create(const char *propname, u32 liobn, u64 dma_addr,
+ u32 page_shift, u32 window_shift)
+{
+ struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *ddwprop;
+ struct property *win64;
+
+ win64 = kzalloc(sizeof(*win64), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!win64)
+ return NULL;
+
+ win64->name = kstrdup(propname, GFP_KERNEL);
+ ddwprop = kzalloc(sizeof(*ddwprop), GFP_KERNEL);
+ win64->value = ddwprop;
+ win64->length = sizeof(*ddwprop);
+ if (!win64->name || !win64->value) {
+ kfree(win64);
+ kfree(win64->name);
+ kfree(win64->value);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ ddwprop->liobn = cpu_to_be32(liobn);
+ ddwprop->dma_base = cpu_to_be64(dma_addr);
+ ddwprop->tce_shift = cpu_to_be32(page_shift);
+ ddwprop->window_shift = cpu_to_be32(window_shift);
+
+ return win64;
+}
+
/* Return largest page shift based on "IO Page Sizes" output of ibm,query-pe-dma-window. */
static int iommu_get_page_shift(u32 query_page_size)
{
@@ -1167,11 +1196,11 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
struct ddw_query_response query;
struct ddw_create_response create;
int page_shift;
+ u64 win_addr;
struct device_node *dn;
u32 ddw_avail[DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE];
struct direct_window *window;
struct property *win64 = NULL;
- struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *ddwprop;
struct failed_ddw_pdn *fpdn;
bool default_win_removed = false;
bool pmem_present;
@@ -1286,65 +1315,54 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
1ULL << page_shift);
goto out_failed;
}
- win64 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct property), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!win64) {
- dev_info(&dev->dev,
- "couldn't allocate property for 64bit dma window\n");
- goto out_failed;
- }
- win64->name = kstrdup(DIRECT64_PROPNAME, GFP_KERNEL);
- win64->value = ddwprop = kmalloc(sizeof(*ddwprop), GFP_KERNEL);
- win64->length = sizeof(*ddwprop);
- if (!win64->name || !win64->value) {
- dev_info(&dev->dev,
- "couldn't allocate property name and value\n");
- goto out_free_prop;
- }
ret = create_ddw(dev, ddw_avail, &create, page_shift, len);
if (ret != 0)
- goto out_free_prop;
-
- ddwprop->liobn = cpu_to_be32(create.liobn);
- ddwprop->dma_base = cpu_to_be64(((u64)create.addr_hi << 32) |
- create.addr_lo);
- ddwprop->tce_shift = cpu_to_be32(page_shift);
- ddwprop->window_shift = cpu_to_be32(len);
+ goto out_failed;
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "created tce table LIOBN 0x%x for %pOF\n",
create.liobn, dn);
- window = ddw_list_new_entry(pdn, ddwprop);
+ win_addr = ((u64)create.addr_hi << 32) | create.addr_lo;
+ win64 = ddw_property_create(DIRECT64_PROPNAME, create.liobn, win_addr,
+ page_shift, len);
+ if (!win64) {
+ dev_info(&dev->dev,
+ "couldn't allocate property, property name, or value\n");
+ goto out_del_win;
+ }
+
+ ret = of_add_property(pdn, win64);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&dev->dev, "unable to add dma window property for %pOF: %d",
+ pdn, ret);
+ goto out_free_prop;
+ }
+
+ window = ddw_list_new_entry(pdn, win64->value);
if (!window)
- goto out_clear_window;
+ goto out_del_prop;
ret = walk_system_ram_range(0, memblock_end_of_DRAM() >> PAGE_SHIFT,
win64->value, tce_setrange_multi_pSeriesLP_walk);
if (ret) {
dev_info(&dev->dev, "failed to map direct window for %pOF: %d\n",
dn, ret);
- goto out_free_window;
- }
-
- ret = of_add_property(pdn, win64);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(&dev->dev, "unable to add dma window property for %pOF: %d",
- pdn, ret);
- goto out_free_window;
+ goto out_del_list;
}
spin_lock(&direct_window_list_lock);
list_add(&window->list, &direct_window_list);
spin_unlock(&direct_window_list_lock);
- dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset = be64_to_cpu(ddwprop->dma_base);
+ dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset = win_addr;
goto out_unlock;
-out_free_window:
+out_del_list:
kfree(window);
-out_clear_window:
- remove_ddw(pdn, true);
+out_del_prop:
+ of_remove_property(pdn, win64);
out_free_prop:
kfree(win64->name);
@@ -1352,6 +1370,9 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
kfree(win64);
win64 = NULL;
+out_del_win:
+ remove_ddw(pdn, true);
+
out_failed:
if (default_win_removed)
reset_dma_window(dev, pdn);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 7:07 [PATCH v3 00/11] DDW + Indirect Mapping Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Replace hard-coded page shift Leonardo Bras
2021-04-23 7:27 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-04-30 15:58 ` Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] powerpc/kernel/iommu: Add new iommu_table_in_use() helper Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Add iommu_pseries_alloc_table() helper Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Add ddw_list_new_entry() helper Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Allow DDW windows starting at 0x00 Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2021-04-23 9:04 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Add ddw_property_create() and refactor enable_ddw() Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-04-30 16:05 ` Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Reorganize iommu_table_setparms*() with new helper Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Update remove_dma_window() to accept property name Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Find existing DDW with given " Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Make use of DDW for indirect mapping Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Rename "direct window" to "dma window" Leonardo Bras
2021-04-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] DDW + Indirect Mapping Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210422070721.463912-7-leobras.c@gmail.com \
--to=leobras.c@gmail.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).