From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727C5C433B4 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371CB6143D for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231861AbhD1P2p (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:28:45 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:2893 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229890AbhD1P2n (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:28:43 -0400 IronPort-SDR: lBaNVByv1EdhK4rWg/WoN5iS2JUjTREr9FrY+g1EUP6A7yQ48/8q0xg9Jt1XpHib+xhIi/3vPs 7W1A8YHISBeA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9968"; a="176246352" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,258,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="176246352" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Apr 2021 08:27:51 -0700 IronPort-SDR: S9Sico2+xdjLqJbZr8Rrxja1peIv+AHCGNigg/J9F/+P7epHYuQ2uWp+UVdqVxCv2pHJBUw1Tf VO7oj+gq6UzQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,258,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="430353047" Received: from pl-dbox.sh.intel.com (HELO pl-dbox) ([10.239.159.39]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2021 08:27:48 -0700 Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 23:23:39 +0800 From: Philip Li To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Feng Tang , "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" , Ingo Molnar , LKML , "lkp@lists.01.org" , "lkp@intel.com" , "zhengjun.xing@intel.com" , "x86@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [genirq] cbe16f35be: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -5.2% regression Message-ID: <20210428152339.GA2282261@pl-dbox> References: <20210427090013.GG32408@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <87fszcnecr.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20210428050758.GB52098@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20210428080819.GB53821@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <87o8dyn5xr.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o8dyn5xr.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:56:16AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28 2021 at 16:08, Feng Tang wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 07:01:35AM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > > >> But it is still an irrelevant problem. > > Yes, the commit itself has no problem. And my personal thought > > is no further action is needed. > > The commit does not need any further action, but this testing stuff Sorry Thomas for confusion and trouble caused by this. We will take it seriously to refine the report process for this category (alignment or cache behavior) of performance change, to avoid meaningless ones. Thanks > really needs further action because we can't differentiate between real > regressions and these bogus reports anymore. > > Thanks, > > tglx > _______________________________________________ > LKP mailing list -- lkp@lists.01.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@lists.01.org