linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/fair: Call newidle_balance() from balance_callback on PREEMPT_RT
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:28:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210428232821.2506201-2-swood@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210428232821.2506201-1-swood@redhat.com>

This is required in order to be able to enable interrupts in the next
patch.  This is limited to PREEMPT_RT to avoid adding potentially
measurable overhead to the non-RT case (requiring a double switch when
pulling a task onto a newly idle cpu).

update_misfit_status() is factored out for the PREEMPT_RT case, to ensure
that the misfit status is kept consistent before dropping the lock.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
---
v2: Use a balance callback, and limit to PREEMPT_RT

 kernel/sched/fair.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 794c2cb945f8..ff369c38a5b5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5660,6 +5660,9 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 
+static const bool newidle_balance_in_callback = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, rebalance_head);
+
 /* Working cpumask for: load_balance, load_balance_newidle. */
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, load_balance_mask);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, select_idle_mask);
@@ -10549,7 +10552,7 @@ static inline void nohz_newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) { }
  *     0 - failed, no new tasks
  *   > 0 - success, new (fair) tasks present
  */
-static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static int do_newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 {
 	unsigned long next_balance = jiffies + HZ;
 	int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu;
@@ -10557,7 +10560,9 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	int pulled_task = 0;
 	u64 curr_cost = 0;
 
-	update_misfit_status(NULL, this_rq);
+	if (!newidle_balance_in_callback)
+		update_misfit_status(NULL, this_rq);
+
 	/*
 	 * We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such that we
 	 * measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
@@ -10576,7 +10581,8 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	 * further scheduler activity on it and we're being very careful to
 	 * re-start the picking loop.
 	 */
-	rq_unpin_lock(this_rq, rf);
+	if (!newidle_balance_in_callback)
+		rq_unpin_lock(this_rq, rf);
 
 	if (this_rq->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost ||
 	    !READ_ONCE(this_rq->rd->overload)) {
@@ -10655,11 +10661,31 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	if (pulled_task)
 		this_rq->idle_stamp = 0;
 
-	rq_repin_lock(this_rq, rf);
+	if (!newidle_balance_in_callback)
+		rq_repin_lock(this_rq, rf);
 
 	return pulled_task;
 }
 
+static void newidle_balance_cb(struct rq *this_rq)
+{
+	update_rq_clock(this_rq);
+	do_newidle_balance(this_rq, NULL);
+}
+
+static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+	if (newidle_balance_in_callback) {
+		update_misfit_status(NULL, this_rq);
+		queue_balance_callback(this_rq,
+				       &per_cpu(rebalance_head, this_rq->cpu),
+				       newidle_balance_cb);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return do_newidle_balance(this_rq, rf);
+}
+
 /*
  * run_rebalance_domains is triggered when needed from the scheduler tick.
  * Also triggered for nohz idle balancing (with nohz_balancing_kick set).
-- 
2.27.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-28 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-28 23:28 [PATCH v2 0/3] newidle_balance() PREEMPT_RT latency mitigations Scott Wood
2021-04-28 23:28 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2021-05-05 12:13   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/fair: Call newidle_balance() from balance_callback on PREEMPT_RT Vincent Guittot
2021-05-07 15:19     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-04-28 23:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sched/fair: Enable interrupts when dropping lock in newidle_balance() Scott Wood
2021-04-28 23:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: break out of newidle balancing if an RT task appears Scott Wood
2021-04-29  4:11   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-29  6:37   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07 11:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-15  7:29     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-05-15  8:36       ` Mike Galbraith
2021-04-29  7:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] newidle_balance() PREEMPT_RT latency mitigations Vincent Guittot
2021-05-01 22:03   ` Scott Wood
2021-05-02  3:25     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-05-03 16:33       ` Scott Wood
2021-05-03 18:52         ` Mike Galbraith
2021-05-03 21:57           ` Scott Wood
2021-05-04  4:07             ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210428232821.2506201-2-swood@redhat.com \
    --to=swood@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).