Hi!

> > The original, while again messy, looks ok, so I'll drop this revert.
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Argh, no, this one has already been reverted in Linus's tree.  I've been
> reviewing to many of these today, I think it's time to get some rest...

This one is important, it is the one that triggered it AFAICT. And
this one is _bad_, so should be reverted.

But I see no proof of malice.
								Pavel

-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek