From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, peterz@infradead.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
jbaron@akamai.com, ardb@kernel.org,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@wdc.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
zong.li@sifive.com, guoren@linux.alibaba.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, 0x7f454c46@gmail.com,
chenhuang5@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: insn: Use a raw spinlock to protect TEXT_POKE*
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 05:54:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210429215451.yuey5gzmfh2dkzp5@mail.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210429123007.5144fc0d@gandalf.local.home>
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:30:07PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 23:17:13 -0700
> Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
> >
> > We currently use text_mutex to protect the fixmap sections from
> > concurrent callers. This is convienent for kprobes as the generic code
> > already holds text_mutex, but ftrace doesn't which triggers a lockdep
> > assertion. We could take text_mutex for ftrace, but the jump label
> > implementation (which is currently taking text_mutex) isn't explicitly
> > listed as being sleepable and it's called from enough places it seems
> > safer to just avoid sleeping.
> >
> > arm64 and parisc, the other two TEXT_POKE-style patching
> > implemnetations, already use raw spinlocks. abffa6f3b157 ("arm64:
> > convert patch_lock to raw lock") lays out the case for a raw spinlock as
> > opposed to a regular spinlock, and while I don't know of anyone using rt
> > on RISC-V I'm sure it'll eventually show up and I don't see any reason
> > to wait.
>
> On x86 we use text_mutex for jump label and ftrace. I don't understand the
> issue here. The arm64 update was already using spin locks in the
> insn_write() function itself. riscv just makes sure that text_mutex is held.
>
> It also looks like ftrace on riscv should also have text_mutex held
> whenever it modifies the code. Because I see this in
> arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c:
>
>
> int ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare(void) __acquires(&text_mutex)
> {
> mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> return 0;
> }
>
> int ftrace_arch_code_modify_post_process(void) __releases(&text_mutex)
> {
> mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> return 0;
> }
>
> Which should be getting called before and after respectively from when
> ftrace does its updates.
>
> Can you show me the back trace of that lockdep splat?
>
The problem is that lockdep cannot handle locks across tasks since we use
stopmachine to patch code for risc-v. So there's a false positive report.
See privious disscussion here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/4/29/63
> -- Steve
--
Cheers,
Changbin Du
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-29 6:17 [PATCH] RISC-V: insn: Use a raw spinlock to protect TEXT_POKE* Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-29 7:55 ` Anup Patel
2021-04-29 16:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-29 21:54 ` Changbin Du [this message]
2021-04-30 2:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-30 4:06 ` Anup Patel
2021-04-30 11:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-30 19:44 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-05-06 7:11 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210429215451.yuey5gzmfh2dkzp5@mail.google.com \
--to=changbin.du@gmail.com \
--cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
--cc=Anup.Patel@wdc.com \
--cc=Atish.Patra@wdc.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=chenhuang5@huawei.com \
--cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=palmerdabbelt@google.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).