linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@foss.st.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <pierre-yves.mordret@foss.st.com>,
	<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: stm32f7: add st,smbus-alert binding for SMBus Alert
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 11:49:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210505094916.GA27818@gnbcxd0016.gnb.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210504195348.GB1783@kunai>

Hi Wolfram,

On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:53:48PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > +        st,smbus-alert:
> 
> After reading the specs again, I think we can make this a generic
> binding. SMBusAlert is optional. So, we can say it is not covered by the
> "smbus" binding and needs a seperate one. Makes sense?

Indeed, SMBus Spec [1] mentions about SMBALERT#:
An optional signal that a slave device can use to notify the system
master that it has information for the master

Hence it does make sense to separate it from the smbus binding. I will
post a v4 of this serie with the addition of a generic binding 'smbus-alert'.

Alain

[1] http://www.smbus.org/specs/SMBus_3_1_20180319.pdf


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-05  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-29  6:09 [PATCH v3 0/2] i2c: stm32f7: add SMBus-Alert support Alain Volmat
2021-03-29  6:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: stm32f7: add st,smbus-alert binding for SMBus Alert Alain Volmat
2021-05-04 19:53   ` Wolfram Sang
2021-05-05  9:49     ` Alain Volmat [this message]
2021-03-29  6:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: stm32f7: add SMBus-Alert support Alain Volmat
2021-04-30 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Alain Volmat
2021-05-04 19:51   ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210505094916.GA27818@gnbcxd0016.gnb.st.com \
    --to=alain.volmat@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=pierre-yves.mordret@foss.st.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).