From: glittao@gmail.com
To: brendanhiggins@google.com, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org,
rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, elver@google.com,
dlatypov@google.com, Oliver Glitta <glittao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] kunit: make test->lock irq safe
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 17:07:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511150734.3492-1-glittao@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
The upcoming SLUB kunit test will be calling kunit_find_named_resource() from
a context with disabled interrupts. That means kunit's test->lock needs to be
IRQ safe to avoid potential deadlocks and lockdep splats.
This patch therefore changes the test->lock usage to spin_lock_irqsave()
and spin_unlock_irqrestore().
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Glitta <glittao@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v4
Rebased whole series on 5.13-rc1
include/kunit/test.h | 5 +++--
lib/kunit/test.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 49601c4b98b8..524d4789af22 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -515,8 +515,9 @@ kunit_find_resource(struct kunit *test,
void *match_data)
{
struct kunit_resource *res, *found = NULL;
+ unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock(&test->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(res, &test->resources, node) {
if (match(test, res, (void *)match_data)) {
@@ -526,7 +527,7 @@ kunit_find_resource(struct kunit *test,
}
}
- spin_unlock(&test->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
return found;
}
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 2f6cc0123232..45f068864d76 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ int kunit_add_resource(struct kunit *test,
void *data)
{
int ret = 0;
+ unsigned long flags;
res->free = free;
kref_init(&res->refcount);
@@ -487,10 +488,10 @@ int kunit_add_resource(struct kunit *test,
res->data = data;
}
- spin_lock(&test->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags);
list_add_tail(&res->node, &test->resources);
/* refcount for list is established by kref_init() */
- spin_unlock(&test->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -548,9 +549,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_alloc_and_get_resource);
void kunit_remove_resource(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res)
{
- spin_lock(&test->lock);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags);
list_del(&res->node);
- spin_unlock(&test->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
kunit_put_resource(res);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_remove_resource);
@@ -630,6 +633,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kfree);
void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_resource *res;
+ unsigned long flags;
/*
* test->resources is a stack - each allocation must be freed in the
@@ -641,9 +645,9 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
* protect against the current node being deleted, not the next.
*/
while (true) {
- spin_lock(&test->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags);
if (list_empty(&test->resources)) {
- spin_unlock(&test->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
break;
}
res = list_last_entry(&test->resources,
@@ -654,7 +658,7 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
* resource, and this can't happen if the test->lock
* is held.
*/
- spin_unlock(&test->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
kunit_remove_resource(test, res);
}
current->kunit_test = NULL;
--
2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a5
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-11 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 15:07 glittao [this message]
2021-05-11 15:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality glittao
2021-05-11 15:16 ` Marco Elver
2021-05-12 10:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-12 14:06 ` [PATCH] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality-fix glittao
2021-05-13 4:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality Andrew Morton
2021-05-13 8:54 ` Marco Elver
2021-05-13 9:32 ` Oliver Glitta
2021-05-11 15:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] slub: remove resiliency_test() function glittao
2021-05-12 10:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] kunit: make test->lock irq safe Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210511150734.3492-1-glittao@gmail.com \
--to=glittao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).