From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
sassmann@redhat.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Treat __napi_schedule_irqoff() as __napi_schedule() on PREEMPT_RT
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 13:38:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210514133815.6a698aeb@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v97l2hrp.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Fri, 14 May 2021 22:16:10 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, May 14 2021 at 11:56, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 May 2021 00:28:02 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> Blame me for that decision.
> >>
> >> No matter which variant we end up with, this needs to go into all stable
> >> RT kernels ASAP.
> >
> > Mumble mumble. I thought we concluded that drivers used on RT can be
> > fixed, we've already done it for a couple drivers (by which I mean two).
> > If all the IRQ handler is doing is scheduling NAPI (which it is for
> > modern NICs) - IRQF_NO_THREAD seems like the right option.
>
> Yes. That works, but there are a bunch which do more than that IIRC.
>
> > Is there any driver you care about that we can convert to using
> > IRQF_NO_THREAD so we can have new drivers to "do the right thing"
> > while the old ones depend on this workaround for now?
>
> The start of this thread was about i40e_msix_clean_rings() which
> probably falls under the IRQF_NO_THREAD category, but I'm sure that
> there are others. So I chose the safe way for RT for now.
Sounds reasonable. I'll send a patch with a new helper and convert
an example driver I'm sure falls into the "napi_schedule(); return;"
category. I just want to make sure "the right thing to do" is
accessible for people writing new drivers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-14 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 6:09 [RT] Question about i40e threaded irq Juri Lelli
2021-05-11 6:24 ` Stefan Assmann
2021-05-11 7:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-12 21:43 ` [PATCH net-next] net: Treat __napi_schedule_irqoff() as __napi_schedule() on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-05-12 22:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-13 0:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-13 16:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-14 12:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-14 18:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-05-14 19:44 ` Alison Chaiken
2021-05-14 21:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-14 20:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-14 20:38 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2021-05-13 5:12 ` Juri Lelli
2021-05-13 20:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210514133815.6a698aeb@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).