linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] rtw88: coex: remove unnecessary variable and label
@ 2021-05-20  0:55 samirweng1979
  2021-06-22 15:23 ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: samirweng1979 @ 2021-05-20  0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tony0620emma, kvalo, davem, kuba
  Cc: linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel, wengjianfeng

From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>

In some funciton, the variable ret just used as return value,and
out label just return ret,so ret and out label are unnecessary,
we should delete these and use return true/false to replace.

Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c | 40 ++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c
index cedbf38..103e877 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c
@@ -630,20 +630,16 @@ static bool rtw_coex_get_bt_scan_type(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 *scan_type)
 	struct rtw_coex_info_req req = {0};
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	u8 *payload;
-	bool ret = false;
 
 	req.op_code = BT_MP_INFO_OP_SCAN_TYPE;
 	skb = rtw_coex_info_request(rtwdev, &req);
 	if (!skb)
-		goto out;
+		return false;
 
 	payload = get_payload_from_coex_resp(skb);
 	*scan_type = GET_COEX_RESP_BT_SCAN_TYPE(payload);
 	dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
-	ret = true;
-
-out:
-	return ret;
+	return true;
 }
 
 static bool rtw_coex_set_lna_constrain_level(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
@@ -651,19 +647,15 @@ static bool rtw_coex_set_lna_constrain_level(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
 {
 	struct rtw_coex_info_req req = {0};
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
-	bool ret = false;
 
 	req.op_code = BT_MP_INFO_OP_LNA_CONSTRAINT;
 	req.para1 = lna_constrain_level;
 	skb = rtw_coex_info_request(rtwdev, &req);
 	if (!skb)
-		goto out;
+		return false;
 
 	dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
-	ret = true;
-
-out:
-	return ret;
+	return true;
 }
 
 #define case_BTSTATUS(src) \
@@ -3533,19 +3525,15 @@ static bool rtw_coex_get_bt_patch_version(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
 	struct rtw_coex_info_req req = {0};
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	u8 *payload;
-	bool ret = false;
 
 	req.op_code = BT_MP_INFO_OP_PATCH_VER;
 	skb = rtw_coex_info_request(rtwdev, &req);
 	if (!skb)
-		goto out;
+		return false;
 
 	payload = get_payload_from_coex_resp(skb);
 	*patch_version = GET_COEX_RESP_BT_PATCH_VER(payload);
-	ret = true;
-
-out:
-	return ret;
+	return true;
 }
 
 static bool rtw_coex_get_bt_supported_version(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
@@ -3554,19 +3542,15 @@ static bool rtw_coex_get_bt_supported_version(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
 	struct rtw_coex_info_req req = {0};
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	u8 *payload;
-	bool ret = false;
 
 	req.op_code = BT_MP_INFO_OP_SUPP_VER;
 	skb = rtw_coex_info_request(rtwdev, &req);
 	if (!skb)
-		goto out;
+		return false;
 
 	payload = get_payload_from_coex_resp(skb);
 	*supported_version = GET_COEX_RESP_BT_SUPP_VER(payload);
-	ret = true;
-
-out:
-	return ret;
+	return true;
 }
 
 static bool rtw_coex_get_bt_supported_feature(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
@@ -3575,19 +3559,15 @@ static bool rtw_coex_get_bt_supported_feature(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
 	struct rtw_coex_info_req req = {0};
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	u8 *payload;
-	bool ret = false;
 
 	req.op_code = BT_MP_INFO_OP_SUPP_FEAT;
 	skb = rtw_coex_info_request(rtwdev, &req);
 	if (!skb)
-		goto out;
+		return false;
 
 	payload = get_payload_from_coex_resp(skb);
 	*supported_feature = GET_COEX_RESP_BT_SUPP_FEAT(payload);
-	ret = true;
-
-out:
-	return ret;
+	return true;
 }
 
 struct rtw_coex_sta_stat_iter_data {
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] rtw88: coex: remove unnecessary variable and label
  2021-05-20  0:55 [PATCH] rtw88: coex: remove unnecessary variable and label samirweng1979
@ 2021-06-22 15:23 ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2021-06-22 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: samirweng1979
  Cc: tony0620emma, davem, kuba, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel,
	wengjianfeng

samirweng1979 <samirweng1979@163.com> wrote:

> From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
> 
> In some funciton, the variable ret just used as return value,and
> out label just return ret,so ret and out label are unnecessary,
> we should delete these and use return true/false to replace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

b38678a73c4d rtw88: coex: remove unnecessary variable and label

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20210520005545.31272-1-samirweng1979@163.com/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-22 15:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-20  0:55 [PATCH] rtw88: coex: remove unnecessary variable and label samirweng1979
2021-06-22 15:23 ` Kalle Valo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).