linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ionela.voinescu@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] PM / EM: Skip inefficient OPPs
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 10:46:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210525094601.GB369979@e124901.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YKzETaPD/Flnz+dz@google.com>

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 09:33:01AM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Friday 21 May 2021 at 17:54:24 (+0100), Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> > @@ -161,6 +162,8 @@ static int em_create_perf_table(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
> >  		table[i].cost = div64_u64(fmax * table[i].power,
> >  					  table[i].frequency);
> >  		if (table[i].cost >= prev_cost) {
> > +			table[i].flags = EM_PERF_STATE_INEFFICIENT;
> > +			pd->flags |= EM_PERF_DOMAIN_INEFFICIENCIES;
> 
> If we're looking for micro-optimizations, then perhaps you could store
> the index of the next efficient OPP (which would be 'i' if the current
> OPP is already efficient), so you can jump to it directly when doing the
> search.

Wouldn't add any new field compared to this version so yeah might be an
interesting improvement.

> 
> >  			dev_dbg(dev, "EM: OPP:%lu is inefficient\n",
> >  				table[i].frequency);
> >  		} else {

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-21 16:54 [PATCH v2 0/3] EM / PM: Inefficient OPPs Vincent Donnefort
2021-05-21 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] PM / EM: Fix inefficient state detection Vincent Donnefort
2021-05-24 12:41   ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-25  9:50   ` Quentin Perret
2021-05-21 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] PM / EM: Extend em_perf_domain with a flag field Vincent Donnefort
2021-05-24 12:44   ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-25  9:54   ` Quentin Perret
2021-05-21 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] PM / EM: Skip inefficient OPPs Vincent Donnefort
2021-05-24 12:55   ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-25  8:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-25  9:21     ` Vincent Donnefort
2021-05-25 10:00       ` Vincent Donnefort
2021-05-28  5:09     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-01  8:47       ` Vincent Donnefort
2021-06-01  8:56         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-01  9:07           ` Quentin Perret
2021-06-01  9:13             ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-25  9:33   ` Quentin Perret
2021-05-25  9:46     ` Vincent Donnefort [this message]
2021-05-25 11:03       ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-25 13:06         ` Quentin Perret
2021-05-25 13:34           ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-25  9:47     ` Vincent Donnefort
2021-05-28  5:04   ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-28  9:00     ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-26  3:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] EM / PM: Inefficient OPPs Viresh Kumar
2021-05-26  8:56   ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-26  9:33     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-27  7:13       ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-26  9:01   ` Vincent Donnefort
2021-05-26  9:38     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-26  9:39       ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-26 10:24       ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-26 10:39         ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-26 11:50           ` Lukasz Luba
2021-05-26 13:49       ` Vincent Donnefort

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210525094601.GB369979@e124901.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=vincent.donnefort@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).