linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Geetika Moolchandani <Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/topology: Allow archs to populate distance map
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 17:02:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210525113235.GM2633526@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7irglm9.mognet@arm.com>

* Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> [2021-05-25 11:21:02]:

> On 24/05/21 21:48, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > * Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> [2021-05-24 15:16:09]:
> >> Ok so from your arch you can figure out the *size* of the set of unique
> >> distances, but not the individual node_distance(a, b)... That's quite
> >> unfortunate.
> >
> > Yes, thats true.
> >
> >>
> >> I suppose one way to avoid the hook would be to write some "fake" distance
> >> values into your distance_lookup_table[] for offline nodes using your
> >> distance_ref_point_depth thing, i.e. ensure an iteration of
> >> node_distance(a, b) covers all distance values [1]. You can then keep patch
> >> 3 around, and that should roughly be it.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, this would suffice but to me its not very clean.
> > static int found[distance_ref_point_depth];
> >
> > for_each_node(node){
> >       int i, nd, distance = LOCAL_DISTANCE;
> >               goto out;
> >
> >       nd = node_distance(node, first_online_node)
> >       for (i=0; i < distance_ref_point_depth; i++, distance *= 2) {
> >               if (node_online) {
> >                       if (distance != nd)
> >                               continue;
> >                       found[i] ++;
> >                       break;
> >               }
> >               if (found[i])
> >                       continue;
> >               distance_lookup_table[node][i] = distance_lookup_table[first_online_node][i];
> >               found[i] ++;
> >               break;
> >       }
> > }
> >
> > But do note: We are setting a precedent for node distance between two nodes
> > to change.
> >
> 
> Indeed. AFAICT it's that or the unique-distance-values hook :/

Peter,

Please let me know which approach would you prefer.
I am open to try any other approach too.

In my humble opinion, unique-distance-values hook is more cleaner.
Do you still have any concerns with the unique-distance-values hook?

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20 15:44 [PATCH 0/3] Skip numa distance for offline nodes Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-20 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/topology: Allow archs to populate distance map Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-20 18:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-21  2:38     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-21  8:14       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-21  9:28         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-24 14:16           ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-24 16:18             ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-25 10:21               ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-25 11:32                 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2021-05-28  5:21                 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-28  8:43               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-28 10:24                 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-20 15:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/numa: Populate distance map correctly Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-24 14:16   ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-24 14:50     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-20 15:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched/topology: Skip updating masks for non-online nodes Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210525113235.GM2633526@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com \
    --cc=cheloha@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).