From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm/page_alloc: Introduce vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 13:53:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210528125334.GP30378@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <018c4b99-81a5-bc12-03cd-662a938ef05a@suse.cz>
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 01:59:37PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 5/25/21 10:01 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > This introduces a new sysctl vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction. It is
> > similar to the old vm.percpu_pagelist_fraction. The old sysctl increased
> > both pcp->batch and pcp->high with the higher pcp->high potentially
> > reducing zone->lock contention. However, the higher pcp->batch value also
> > potentially increased allocation latency while the PCP was refilled.
> > This sysctl only adjusts pcp->high so that zone->lock contention is
> > potentially reduced but allocation latency during a PCP refill remains
> > the same.
> >
> > # grep -E "high:|batch" /proc/zoneinfo | tail -2
> > high: 649
> > batch: 63
> >
> > # sysctl vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction=8
> > # grep -E "high:|batch" /proc/zoneinfo | tail -2
> > high: 35071
> > batch: 63
> >
> > # sysctl vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction=64
> > high: 4383
> > batch: 63
> >
> > # sysctl vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction=0
> > high: 649
> > batch: 63
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> > Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>
Thanks.
> Documentation nit below:
>
> > @@ -789,6 +790,25 @@ panic_on_oom=2+kdump gives you very strong tool to investigate
> > why oom happens. You can get snapshot.
> >
> >
> > +percpu_pagelist_high_fraction
> > +=============================
> > +
> > +This is the fraction of pages in each zone that are allocated for each
> > +per cpu page list. The min value for this is 8. It means that we do
> > +not allow more than 1/8th of pages in each zone to be allocated in any
> > +single per_cpu_pagelist.
>
> This, while technically correct (as an upper limit) is somewhat misleading as
> the limit for a single per_cpu_pagelist also considers the number of local cpus.
>
> > This entry only changes the value of hot per
> > +cpu pagelists. User can specify a number like 100 to allocate 1/100th
> > +of each zone to each per cpu page list.
>
> This is worse. Anyone trying to reproduce this example on a system with multiple
> cpus per node and checking the result will be puzzled.
> So I think the part about number of local cpus should be mentioned to avoid
> confusion.
>
Is this any better?
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst
index e85c2f21d209..2da25735a629 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst
@@ -793,15 +793,16 @@ why oom happens. You can get snapshot.
percpu_pagelist_high_fraction
=============================
-This is the fraction of pages in each zone that are allocated for each
-per cpu page list. The min value for this is 8. It means that we do
-not allow more than 1/8th of pages in each zone to be allocated in any
-single per_cpu_pagelist. This entry only changes the value of hot per
-cpu pagelists. User can specify a number like 100 to allocate 1/100th
-of each zone to each per cpu page list.
-
-The batch value of each per cpu pagelist remains the same regardless of the
-value of the high fraction so allocation latencies are unaffected.
+This is the fraction of pages in each zone that are can be stored to
+per-cpu page lists. It is an upper boundary that is divided depending
+on the number of online CPUs. The min value for this is 8 which means
+that we do not allow more than 1/8th of pages in each zone to be stored
+on per-cpu page lists. This entry only changes the value of hot per-cpu
+page lists. A user can specify a number like 100 to allocate 1/100th of
+each zone between per-cpu lists.
+
+The batch value of each per-cpu page list remains the same regardless of
+the value of the high fraction so allocation latencies are unaffected.
The initial value is zero. Kernel uses this value to set the high pcp->high
mark based on the low watermark for the zone and the number of local
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-28 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-25 8:01 [PATCH 0/6 v2] Calculate pcp->high based on zone sizes and active CPUs Mel Gorman
2021-05-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/page_alloc: Delete vm.percpu_pagelist_fraction Mel Gorman
2021-05-26 17:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/page_alloc: Disassociate the pcp->high from pcp->batch Mel Gorman
2021-05-26 18:14 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-27 10:52 ` Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 10:27 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/page_alloc: Adjust pcp->high after CPU hotplug events Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 11:08 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: Scale the number of pages that are batch freed Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 11:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/page_alloc: Limit the number of pages on PCP lists when reclaim is active Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 11:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/page_alloc: Introduce vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 11:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-28 12:53 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-05-28 14:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-27 19:36 ` [PATCH 0/6 v2] Calculate pcp->high based on zone sizes and active CPUs Dave Hansen
2021-05-28 8:55 ` Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 9:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-28 9:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-28 9:49 ` Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 9:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-28 10:09 ` Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 10:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-28 12:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-28 12:37 ` Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 14:39 ` Dave Hansen
2021-05-28 15:18 ` Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 16:17 ` Dave Hansen
2021-05-31 12:00 ` Feng Tang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-05-21 10:28 [RFC PATCH 0/6] " Mel Gorman
2021-05-21 10:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/page_alloc: Introduce vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction Mel Gorman
2021-05-21 22:57 ` Dave Hansen
2021-05-24 9:25 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210528125334.GP30378@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).