From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
ying.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 0/3] mm/mempolicy: some fix and semantics cleanup
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 14:41:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210531144128.e69aaf2904e83ae170f00f06@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1622469956-82897-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>
On Mon, 31 May 2021 22:05:53 +0800 Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> wrote:
> We've posted v4 patchset introducing a new "perfer-many" memory policy
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1615952410-36895-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com/ ,
> for which Michal Hocko gave many comments while pointing out some
> problems, and we also found some semantics confusion about 'prefer'
> and 'local' policy, as well as some duplicated code. This patchset
> tries to address them. Please help to review, thanks!
>
> The patchset has been run with some sanity test like 'stress-ng'
> and 'ltp', and no problem found.
None of the above is suitable for the [0/n] overall description. I
copied-n-pasted the v1 cover letter from the above link. Please check
that it is all still correct and up to date. If not, please send along
replacement text, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-31 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-31 14:05 [v3 PATCH 0/3] mm/mempolicy: some fix and semantics cleanup Feng Tang
2021-05-31 14:05 ` [v3 PATCH 1/3] mm/mempolicy: cleanup nodemask intersection check for oom Feng Tang
2021-06-01 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2021-06-01 11:08 ` Feng Tang
2021-06-01 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2021-05-31 14:05 ` [v3 PATCH 2/3] mm/mempolicy: don't handle MPOL_LOCAL like a fake MPOL_PREFERRED policy Feng Tang
2021-06-01 8:44 ` Michal Hocko
2021-06-01 11:29 ` Feng Tang
2021-05-31 14:05 ` [v3 PATCH 3/3] mm/mempolicy: unify the parameter sanity check for mbind and set_mempolicy Feng Tang
2021-06-01 8:46 ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-31 21:41 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2021-06-01 0:55 ` [v3 PATCH 0/3] mm/mempolicy: some fix and semantics cleanup Feng Tang
2021-06-01 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210531144128.e69aaf2904e83ae170f00f06@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).