From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 12/19] sched: Introduce task_cpus_dl_admissible() to check proposed affinity
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:47:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210602164719.31777-13-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210602164719.31777-1-will@kernel.org>
In preparation for restricting the affinity of a task during execve()
on arm64, introduce a new task_cpus_dl_admissible() helper function to
give an indication as to whether the restricted mask is admissible for
a deadline task.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 91a6cfeae242..9b17d8cfa6ef 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1691,6 +1691,7 @@ extern void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new
extern int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask);
extern int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src, int node);
extern void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p);
+extern bool task_cpus_dl_admissible(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask);
extern void force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p);
extern void relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p);
#else
@@ -1713,6 +1714,11 @@ static inline void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p)
{
WARN_ON(p->user_cpus_ptr);
}
+
+static inline bool task_cpus_dl_admissible(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask)
+{
+ return true;
+}
#endif
extern int yield_to(struct task_struct *p, bool preempt);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 58e2cf7520c0..b4f8dc18ae11 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6933,6 +6933,31 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
return retval;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+bool task_cpus_dl_admissible(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask)
+{
+ bool ret;
+
+ /*
+ * If the task isn't a deadline task or admission control is
+ * disabled then we don't care about affinity changes.
+ */
+ if (!task_has_dl_policy(p) || !dl_bandwidth_enabled())
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis,
+ * if admission test is enabled, we only admit -deadline
+ * tasks allowed to run on all the CPUs in the task's
+ * root_domain.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ ret = cpumask_subset(task_rq(p)->rd->span, mask);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return ret;
+}
+#endif
+
static int
__sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
@@ -6950,23 +6975,10 @@ __sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask)
cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed);
cpumask_and(new_mask, mask, cpus_allowed);
- /*
- * Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis,
- * if admission test is enabled, we only admit -deadline
- * tasks allowed to run on all the CPUs in the task's
- * root_domain.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && dl_bandwidth_enabled()) {
- rcu_read_lock();
- if (!cpumask_subset(task_rq(p)->rd->span, new_mask)) {
- retval = -EBUSY;
- rcu_read_unlock();
- goto out_free_new_mask;
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!task_cpus_dl_admissible(p, new_mask)) {
+ retval = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_free_new_mask;
}
-#endif
again:
retval = __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(p, new_mask, SCA_CHECK | SCA_USER);
if (retval)
--
2.32.0.rc0.204.g9fa02ecfa5-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-02 16:47 [PATCH v8 00/19] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 01/19] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon
2021-06-03 12:38 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-03 17:24 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 02/19] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon
2021-06-03 12:37 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-03 17:44 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 9:38 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 11:05 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 12:04 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 13:50 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 03/19] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 04/19] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 05/19] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:10 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-07 17:04 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 06/19] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:11 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-07 17:20 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-10 10:20 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 07/19] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:11 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 08/19] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:11 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-07 22:43 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 09/19] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 10/19] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 11/19] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-07 22:52 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-10 10:20 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-06-03 9:43 ` [PATCH v8 12/19] sched: Introduce task_cpus_dl_admissible() to check proposed affinity Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-06-03 9:52 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 13/19] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 14/19] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-06-03 9:45 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 15/19] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon
2021-06-03 12:58 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-03 17:40 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 9:49 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 12:14 ` Qais Yousef
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 16/19] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 17/19] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 18/19] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon
2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 19/19] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210602164719.31777-13-will@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).