From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Haibo Xu <Haibo.Xu@arm.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/8] KVM: arm64: Introduce MTE VM feature
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 17:00:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210603160031.GE20338@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210524104513.13258-5-steven.price@arm.com>
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:45:09AM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index c5d1f3c87dbd..226035cf7d6c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -822,6 +822,42 @@ transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> return PAGE_SIZE;
> }
>
> +static int sanitise_mte_tags(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> + unsigned long size)
> +{
> + if (kvm_has_mte(kvm)) {
Nitpick (less indentation):
if (!kvm_has_mte(kvm))
return 0;
> + /*
> + * The page will be mapped in stage 2 as Normal Cacheable, so
> + * the VM will be able to see the page's tags and therefore
> + * they must be initialised first. If PG_mte_tagged is set,
> + * tags have already been initialised.
> + * pfn_to_online_page() is used to reject ZONE_DEVICE pages
> + * that may not support tags.
> + */
> + unsigned long i, nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct page *page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
> +
> + if (!page)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++, page++) {
> + /*
> + * There is a potential (but very unlikely) race
> + * between two VMs which are sharing a physical page
> + * entering this at the same time. However by splitting
> + * the test/set the only risk is tags being overwritten
> + * by the mte_clear_page_tags() call.
> + */
And I think the real risk here is when the page is writable by at least
one of the VMs sharing the page. This excludes KSM, so it only leaves
the MAP_SHARED mappings.
> + if (!test_bit(PG_mte_tagged, &page->flags)) {
> + mte_clear_page_tags(page_address(page));
> + set_bit(PG_mte_tagged, &page->flags);
> + }
> + }
If we want to cover this race (I'd say in a separate patch), we can call
mte_sync_page_tags(page, __pte(0), false, true) directly (hopefully I
got the arguments right). We can avoid the big lock in most cases if
kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region() sets a VM_MTE_RESET (tag clear etc.)
and __alloc_zeroed_user_highpage() clears the tags on allocation (as we
do for VM_MTE but the new flag would not affect the stage 1 VMM page
attributes).
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
> unsigned long fault_status)
> @@ -971,8 +1007,13 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> if (writable)
> prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W;
>
> - if (fault_status != FSC_PERM && !device)
> + if (fault_status != FSC_PERM && !device) {
> + ret = sanitise_mte_tags(kvm, pfn, vma_pagesize);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unlock;
Maybe it was discussed in a previous version, why do we need this in
addition to kvm_set_spte_gfn()?
> +
> clean_dcache_guest_page(pfn, vma_pagesize);
> + }
>
> if (exec_fault) {
> prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X;
> @@ -1168,12 +1209,17 @@ bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> bool kvm_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> {
> kvm_pfn_t pfn = pte_pfn(range->pte);
> + int ret;
>
> if (!kvm->arch.mmu.pgt)
> return 0;
>
> WARN_ON(range->end - range->start != 1);
>
> + ret = sanitise_mte_tags(kvm, pfn, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (ret)
> + return false;
> +
> /*
> * We've moved a page around, probably through CoW, so let's treat it
> * just like a translation fault and clean the cache to the PoC.
Otherwise the patch looks fine.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-03 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 10:45 [PATCH v13 0/8] MTE support for KVM guest Steven Price
2021-05-24 10:45 ` [PATCH v13 1/8] arm64: mte: Handle race when synchronising tags Steven Price
2021-05-24 10:45 ` [PATCH v13 2/8] arm64: Handle MTE tags zeroing in __alloc_zeroed_user_highpage() Steven Price
2021-05-24 10:45 ` [PATCH v13 3/8] arm64: mte: Sync tags for pages where PTE is untagged Steven Price
2021-06-03 14:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-05-24 10:45 ` [PATCH v13 4/8] KVM: arm64: Introduce MTE VM feature Steven Price
2021-06-03 16:00 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-06-04 9:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-04 10:42 ` Steven Price
2021-06-04 11:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-04 12:51 ` Steven Price
2021-06-04 14:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-05-24 10:45 ` [PATCH v13 5/8] KVM: arm64: Save/restore MTE registers Steven Price
2021-06-03 16:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-05-24 10:45 ` [PATCH v13 6/8] KVM: arm64: Expose KVM_ARM_CAP_MTE Steven Price
2021-06-03 16:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-05-24 10:45 ` [PATCH v13 7/8] KVM: arm64: ioctl to fetch/store tags in a guest Steven Price
2021-06-03 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-04 11:15 ` Steven Price
2021-06-04 11:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-04 13:09 ` Steven Price
2021-06-04 15:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-05-24 10:45 ` [PATCH v13 8/8] KVM: arm64: Document MTE capability and ioctl Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210603160031.GE20338@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=Haibo.Xu@arm.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).