[PATCH v4 1/4] kunit: Support skipped tests

* [PATCH v4 1/4] kunit: Support skipped tests
@ 2021-06-11  7:07 David Gow
  2021-06-11  7:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] kunit: tool: Support skipped tests in kunit_tool David Gow
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2021-06-11  7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brendan Higgins, Alan Maguire
  Cc: David Gow, Daniel Latypov, Shuah Khan, Marco Elver, kunit-dev,
	linux-kselftest, linux-kernel

The kunit_mark_skipped() macro marks the current test as "skipped", with
the provided reason. The kunit_skip() macro will mark the test as
skipped, and abort the test.

The TAP specification supports this "SKIP directive" as a comment after
the "ok" / "not ok" for a test. See the "Directives" section of the TAP
spec for details:
https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html#directives

The 'success' field for KUnit tests is replaced with a kunit_status
enum, which can be SUCCESS, FAILURE, or SKIPPED, combined with a
'status_comment' containing information on why a test was skipped.

A new 'kunit_status' test suite is added to test this.

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
---

Note: this series depends upon:
- The first two patches in the "kunit: Do not typecheck binary
  assertions" series:
  - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210513193204.816681-1-davidgow@google.com/
- The "kunit: Fix result propagation for parametrised tests" patch:
  - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210611035725.1248874-1-davidgow@google.com/



Changes since v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210608064852.609327-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Rebase on top of (and adapt) the fix for parameterised test result
  propagation:
  - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210611035725.1248874-1-davidgow@google.com/

Changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210528075932.347154-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Make the length of the status comment a #define
- Fixed a build issue where debugfs was still using the old
  kunit_status_to_string() function name.

Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210526081112.3652290-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Renamed kunit_status_to_string() to kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok
- Fixed incorrect printing of status comments on non-skipped tests.

 include/kunit/test.h   | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 lib/kunit/debugfs.c    |  2 +-
 lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 lib/kunit/test.c       | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 4 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index b68c61348121..fb481696c587 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ struct kunit;
 /* Maximum size of parameter description string. */
 #define KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE 128
 
+/* Maximum size of a status comment. */
+#define KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE 256
+
 /*
  * TAP specifies subtest stream indentation of 4 spaces, 8 spaces for a
  * sub-subtest.  See the "Subtests" section in
@@ -105,6 +108,18 @@ struct kunit;
 #define KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT		"    "
 #define KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT		"        "
 
+/**
+ * enum kunit_status - Type of result for a test or test suite
+ * @KUNIT_SUCCESS: Denotes the test suite has not failed nor been skipped
+ * @KUNIT_FAILURE: Denotes the test has failed.
+ * @KUNIT_SKIPPED: Denotes the test has been skipped.
+ */
+enum kunit_status {
+	KUNIT_SUCCESS,
+	KUNIT_FAILURE,
+	KUNIT_SKIPPED,
+};
+
 /**
  * struct kunit_case - represents an individual test case.
  *
@@ -148,13 +163,20 @@ struct kunit_case {
 	const void* (*generate_params)(const void *prev, char *desc);
 
 	/* private: internal use only. */
-	bool success;
+	enum kunit_status status;
 	char *log;
 };
 
-static inline char *kunit_status_to_string(bool status)
+static inline char *kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(enum kunit_status status)
 {
-	return status ? "ok" : "not ok";
+	switch (status) {
+	case KUNIT_SKIPPED:
+	case KUNIT_SUCCESS:
+		return "ok";
+	case KUNIT_FAILURE:
+		return "not ok";
+	}
+	return "invalid";
 }
 
 /**
@@ -212,6 +234,7 @@ struct kunit_suite {
 	struct kunit_case *test_cases;
 
 	/* private: internal use only */
+	char status_comment[KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE];
 	struct dentry *debugfs;
 	char *log;
 };
@@ -245,19 +268,21 @@ struct kunit {
 	 * be read after the test case finishes once all threads associated
 	 * with the test case have terminated.
 	 */
-	bool success; /* Read only after test_case finishes! */
 	spinlock_t lock; /* Guards all mutable test state. */
+	enum kunit_status status; /* Read only after test_case finishes! */
 	/*
 	 * Because resources is a list that may be updated multiple times (with
 	 * new resources) from any thread associated with a test case, we must
 	 * protect it with some type of lock.
 	 */
 	struct list_head resources; /* Protected by lock. */
+
+	char status_comment[KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE];
 };
 
 static inline void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	WRITE_ONCE(test->success, false);
+	WRITE_ONCE(test->status, KUNIT_FAILURE);
 }
 
 void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log);
@@ -348,7 +373,7 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
 #define kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)		\
 	for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++)
 
-bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite);
+enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite);
 
 /*
  * Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource
@@ -612,6 +637,42 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test);
 
 void kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...);
 
+/**
+ * kunit_mark_skipped() - Marks @test_or_suite as skipped
+ *
+ * @test_or_suite: The test context object.
+ * @fmt:  A printk() style format string.
+ *
+ * Marks the test as skipped. @fmt is given output as the test status
+ * comment, typically the reason the test was skipped.
+ *
+ * Test execution continues after kunit_mark_skipped() is called.
+ */
+#define kunit_mark_skipped(test_or_suite, fmt, ...)			\
+	do {								\
+		WRITE_ONCE((test_or_suite)->status, KUNIT_SKIPPED);	\
+		scnprintf((test_or_suite)->status_comment,		\
+			  KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE,			\
+			  fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);				\
+	} while (0)
+
+/**
+ * kunit_skip() - Marks @test_or_suite as skipped
+ *
+ * @test_or_suite: The test context object.
+ * @fmt:  A printk() style format string.
+ *
+ * Skips the test. @fmt is given output as the test status
+ * comment, typically the reason the test was skipped.
+ *
+ * Test execution is halted after kunit_skip() is called.
+ */
+#define kunit_skip(test_or_suite, fmt, ...)				\
+	do {								\
+		kunit_mark_skipped((test_or_suite), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);\
+		kunit_try_catch_throw(&((test_or_suite)->try_catch));	\
+	} while (0)
+
 /*
  * printk and log to per-test or per-suite log buffer.  Logging only done
  * if CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is 'y'; if it is 'n', no log is allocated/used.
diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
index 9214c493d8b7..b71db0abc12b 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 		debugfs_print_result(seq, suite, test_case);
 
 	seq_printf(seq, "%s %d - %s\n",
-		   kunit_status_to_string(success), 1, suite->name);
+		   kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(success), 1, suite->name);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
index 69f902440a0e..d69efcbed624 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
@@ -437,7 +437,47 @@ static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
 #endif
 }
 
+static void kunit_status_set_failure_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit fake;
+
+	kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SUCCESS);
+	kunit_set_failure(&fake);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_FAILURE);
+}
+
+static void kunit_status_mark_skipped_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit fake;
+
+	kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL);
+
+	/* Before: Should be SUCCESS with no comment. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, "");
+
+	/* Mark the test as skipped. */
+	kunit_mark_skipped(&fake, "Accepts format string: %s", "YES");
+
+	/* After: Should be SKIPPED with our comment. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SKIPPED);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, "Accepts format string: YES");
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case kunit_status_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_status_set_failure_test),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_status_mark_skipped_test),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite kunit_status_test_suite = {
+	.name = "kunit_status",
+	.test_cases = kunit_status_test_cases,
+};
+
 kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite,
-		  &kunit_log_test_suite);
+		  &kunit_log_test_suite, &kunit_status_test_suite);
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 17973a4a44c2..2d4490ca3ed1 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -98,12 +98,14 @@ static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 
 static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite,
 				  bool is_test,
-				  bool is_ok,
+				  enum kunit_status status,
 				  size_t test_number,
-				  const char *description)
+				  const char *description,
+				  const char *directive)
 {
 	struct kunit_suite *suite = is_test ? NULL : test_or_suite;
 	struct kunit *test = is_test ? test_or_suite : NULL;
+	const char *directive_header = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? " # SKIP " : "";
 
 	/*
 	 * We do not log the test suite results as doing so would
@@ -114,25 +116,31 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite,
 	 * representation.
 	 */
 	if (suite)
-		pr_info("%s %zd - %s\n",
-			kunit_status_to_string(is_ok),
-			test_number, description);
+		pr_info("%s %zd - %s%s%s\n",
+			kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status),
+			test_number, description, directive_header,
+			(status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : "");
 	else
-		kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s",
-			  kunit_status_to_string(is_ok),
-			  test_number, description);
+		kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
+			  KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s%s%s",
+			  kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status),
+			  test_number, description, directive_header,
+			  (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : "");
 }
 
-bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite)
+enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
 	const struct kunit_case *test_case;
+	enum kunit_status status = KUNIT_SKIPPED;
 
 	kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
-		if (!test_case->success)
-			return false;
+		if (test_case->status == KUNIT_FAILURE)
+			return KUNIT_FAILURE;
+		else if (test_case->status == KUNIT_SUCCESS)
+			status = KUNIT_SUCCESS;
 	}
 
-	return true;
+	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_has_succeeded);
 
@@ -143,7 +151,8 @@ static void kunit_print_subtest_end(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 	kunit_print_ok_not_ok((void *)suite, false,
 			      kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite),
 			      kunit_suite_counter++,
-			      suite->name);
+			      suite->name,
+			      suite->status_comment);
 }
 
 unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite,
@@ -252,7 +261,8 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log)
 	test->log = log;
 	if (test->log)
 		test->log[0] = '\0';
-	test->success = true;
+	test->status = KUNIT_SUCCESS;
+	test->status_comment[0] = '\0';
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_init_test);
 
@@ -376,7 +386,11 @@ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite,
 	context.test_case = test_case;
 	kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context);
 
-	test_case->success &= test->success;
+	/* Propagate the parameter result to the test case. */
+	if (test->status == KUNIT_FAILURE)
+		test_case->status = KUNIT_FAILURE;
+	else if (test_case->status != KUNIT_FAILURE && test->status == KUNIT_SUCCESS)
+		test_case->status = KUNIT_SUCCESS;
 }
 
 int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
@@ -388,7 +402,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 
 	kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
 		struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
-		test_case->success = true;
+		test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED;
 
 		if (test_case->generate_params) {
 			/* Get initial param. */
@@ -409,7 +423,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 					  KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
 					  "# %s: %s %d - %s",
 					  test_case->name,
-					  kunit_status_to_string(test.success),
+					  kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(test.status),
 					  test.param_index + 1, param_desc);
 
 				/* Get next param. */
@@ -419,9 +433,10 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 			}
 		} while (test.param_value);
 
-		kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_case->success,
+		kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_case->status,
 				      kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case),
-				      test_case->name);
+				      test_case->name,
+				      test.status_comment);
 	}
 
 	kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
@@ -433,6 +448,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_run_tests);
 static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
 	kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite);
+	suite->status_comment[0] = '\0';
 }
 
 int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites)
-- 
2.32.0.272.g935e593368-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread