linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, vdumpa@nvidia.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Fix race condition during default domain allocation
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 11:45:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210611104524.GD15274@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1623298614-31755-2-git-send-email-amhetre@nvidia.com>

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:46:53AM +0530, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> Domain is getting created more than once during asynchronous multiple
> display heads(devices) probe. All the display heads share same SID and
> are expected to be in same domain. As iommu_alloc_default_domain() call
> is not protected, the group->default_domain and group->domain are ending
> up with different domains and leading to subsequent IOMMU faults.
> Fix this by protecting iommu_alloc_default_domain() call with group->mutex.

Can you provide some more information about exactly what the h/w
configuration is, and the callstack which exhibits the race, please?

> Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 808ab70..2700500 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -273,7 +273,9 @@ int iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>  	 * support default domains, so the return value is not yet
>  	 * checked.
>  	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
>  	iommu_alloc_default_domain(group, dev);
> +	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);

It feels wrong to serialise this for everybody just to cater for systems
with aliasing SIDs between devices.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-11 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-10  4:16 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix races in iommu domain/group creation Ashish Mhetre
2021-06-10  4:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Fix race condition during default domain allocation Ashish Mhetre
2021-06-11 10:45   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-06-11 12:49     ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-17  5:51       ` Ashish Mhetre
2021-06-17 17:49         ` Will Deacon
2021-06-11 18:30     ` Krishna Reddy
2021-06-10  4:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix race condition during iommu_group creation Ashish Mhetre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210611104524.GD15274@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=amhetre@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).