From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B58AC2B9F4 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819EA613DB for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232343AbhFQLfX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:35:23 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:58410 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231386AbhFQLfU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:35:20 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 99F0168C4E; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:33:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:33:09 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Jianxiong Gao , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Christoph Hellwig , Dominique MARTINET , Linus Torvalds , Horia =?utf-8?Q?Geant=C4=83?= , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Lukas Hartmann , Aymen Sghaier , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Marc Orr , Erdem Aktas , Peter Gonda Subject: Re: swiotlb/caamjr regression (Was: [GIT PULL] (swiotlb) stable/for-linus-5.12) Message-ID: <20210617113309.GA17666@lst.de> References: <2e899de2-4b69-c4b6-33a6-09fb8949d2fd@nxp.com> <20210611062153.GA30906@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:27:39PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > How unique is this NVMe? Should I be able to reproduce this with any > type or is it specific to Google Cloud? With swiotlb=force this should be reproducable everywhere.