From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AEFC49361 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4C861A0F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231872AbhF1Qiu (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:38:50 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50822 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231734AbhF1Qir (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:38:47 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28BCE6144F; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:36:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1624898181; bh=fM2UYPrxJnpjJzQAfwhDN/Dv4U8bjUg8ETAvFWC4mxw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UuaXR6cXmyMxOTx7grxZ24uIGOf6jgvD8ysUu96av3wk89rlbRPaKiJDI0cmE0QAb pM4YS+ZLr/+CDUl5W0J5EF8o6tRDijdh+prAwYToHd5bu5EH0ixh9Tbo0wmXl/OgF3 oHg4IJ/gq+2ikxlLPqb3xh+q643IGLcP+CmgFMiz5lrnOgSKRIwYmN/3l2e4jBcRT8 llt+fsOjc3rDiM10+ds3IWilKARbJlkBrYW804L9Q46nzfcSYxdl4hYDoMln95i4DD ZUsSkZUsKS1Ex1jFK6nNPGGWbOFBcT3rNxb1qQNzaLTo4uGamDys6hG2cweh4FifRu d57SPXviKUlDA== Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:35:53 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Randy Dunlap Cc: LKML , Codrin Ciubotariu , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Bo Shen , =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= , Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: atmel: ATMEL drivers depend on HAS_DMA Message-ID: <20210628163553.GD4492@sirena.org.uk> References: <20210530204851.3372-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> <9ba0da3b-dbdb-c91d-2def-f3dcd30cbde3@infradead.org> <20210628130214.GB4492@sirena.org.uk> <6734cd67-ae14-74f4-a78e-b6a810c1cdec@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kvUQC+jR9YzypDnK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6734cd67-ae14-74f4-a78e-b6a810c1cdec@infradead.org> X-Cookie: Someone is speaking well of you. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --kvUQC+jR9YzypDnK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 09:03:25AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 6/28/21 6:02 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so= =20 > a. The entire email/patch was there. Should I put the ping _after_ the pa= tch? > Would that help? Never send content free pings of any kind. There's an "and" there. Quoted patches can't be applied. > b. What do you consider a reasonable time? The patch was sent 28 days > prior to this gentle ping. As the mail you are replying to suggests this depends on the patch, some things are more urgent than others, and in any case like I say content free pings no matter how content free are just nose. --kvUQC+jR9YzypDnK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmDZ+mkACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DblggAhwS5IQqddFnWasPd9h6yF5OEbnQV1e2IYp81mj/NjDG7RNdMlWkXl7B7 2Cap8Kax2DtjMNHdykf0pbs4jJzgYxMcuuobtGXFWpTs6+gPm9LcP8R7DYg7c+ok b54DvQ085VHJc2yYMGn6HFq5vBKTJMav4SxMRUjfBzvb9wIqXnn9JQQVRAa8XluV qFJ7+R4VbHILOaRWZqkeVtMGrxlbjQhegTDBmKZhESVSWffUL+I0J1TCrEgQXllq qVrtMGoDVMb7606DbkkKJ8IK8RtWmlwJjXDVnDkZIqphiZ4KVa32CsMK2dXMDz5e AF7qY99WHxYObQaNO9pfnoBaKNVItg== =X13a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kvUQC+jR9YzypDnK--