[PATCH v2] block: Removed a warning while compiling with a cross compiler for parisc

* [PATCH v2] block: Removed a warning while compiling with a cross compiler for parisc
@ 2021-07-04 12:48 Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
  2021-07-06  7:54 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi @ 2021-07-04 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: axboe; +Cc: linux-block, linux-kernel, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi

I have compiled the kernel with a cross compiler "hppa-linux-gnu-" v9.3.0
on x86-64 host machine. I got the following warning:

block/genhd.c: In function ‘diskstats_show’:
block/genhd.c:1227:1: warning: the frame size of 1688 bytes is larger
than 1280 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
 1227  |  }

by Reduced the stack footprint, using new printf specifier to print the
bdevname and wrapping div_u64 function with non-inline wrapper function,
the warning was not omitted anymore.

Signed-off-by: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>
---
 block/genhd.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index 9f8cb7beaad1..6d22b84b182b 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -1151,6 +1151,11 @@ const struct device_type disk_type = {
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+static noinline u64 call_div_u64(u64 dividend, u32 divisor)
+{
+	return div_u64(dividend, divisor);
+}
+
 /*
  * aggregate disk stat collector.  Uses the same stats that the sysfs
  * entries do, above, but makes them available through one seq_file.
@@ -1162,7 +1167,6 @@ static int diskstats_show(struct seq_file *seqf, void *v)
 {
 	struct gendisk *gp = v;
 	struct block_device *hd;
-	char buf[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
 	unsigned int inflight;
 	struct disk_stats stat;
 	unsigned long idx;
@@ -1185,40 +1189,39 @@ static int diskstats_show(struct seq_file *seqf, void *v)
 		else
 			inflight = part_in_flight(hd);
 
-		seq_printf(seqf, "%4d %7d %s "
+		seq_printf(seqf, "%4d %7d %pg "
 			   "%lu %lu %lu %u "
 			   "%lu %lu %lu %u "
 			   "%u %u %u "
 			   "%lu %lu %lu %u "
 			   "%lu %u"
 			   "\n",
-			   MAJOR(hd->bd_dev), MINOR(hd->bd_dev),
-			   disk_name(gp, hd->bd_partno, buf),
+			   MAJOR(hd->bd_dev), MINOR(hd->bd_dev), gp,
 			   stat.ios[STAT_READ],
 			   stat.merges[STAT_READ],
 			   stat.sectors[STAT_READ],
-			   (unsigned int)div_u64(stat.nsecs[STAT_READ],
-							NSEC_PER_MSEC),
+			   (unsigned int)call_div_u64(stat.nsecs[STAT_READ],
+						      NSEC_PER_MSEC),
 			   stat.ios[STAT_WRITE],
 			   stat.merges[STAT_WRITE],
 			   stat.sectors[STAT_WRITE],
-			   (unsigned int)div_u64(stat.nsecs[STAT_WRITE],
-							NSEC_PER_MSEC),
+			   (unsigned int)call_div_u64(stat.nsecs[STAT_WRITE],
+						      NSEC_PER_MSEC),
 			   inflight,
 			   jiffies_to_msecs(stat.io_ticks),
-			   (unsigned int)div_u64(stat.nsecs[STAT_READ] +
-						 stat.nsecs[STAT_WRITE] +
-						 stat.nsecs[STAT_DISCARD] +
-						 stat.nsecs[STAT_FLUSH],
-							NSEC_PER_MSEC),
+			   (unsigned int)call_div_u64(stat.nsecs[STAT_READ] +
+						      stat.nsecs[STAT_WRITE] +
+						      stat.nsecs[STAT_DISCARD] +
+						      stat.nsecs[STAT_FLUSH],
+						      NSEC_PER_MSEC),
 			   stat.ios[STAT_DISCARD],
 			   stat.merges[STAT_DISCARD],
 			   stat.sectors[STAT_DISCARD],
-			   (unsigned int)div_u64(stat.nsecs[STAT_DISCARD],
-						 NSEC_PER_MSEC),
+			   (unsigned int)call_div_u64(stat.nsecs[STAT_DISCARD],
+						      NSEC_PER_MSEC),
 			   stat.ios[STAT_FLUSH],
-			   (unsigned int)div_u64(stat.nsecs[STAT_FLUSH],
-						 NSEC_PER_MSEC)
+			   (unsigned int)call_div_u64(stat.nsecs[STAT_FLUSH],
+						      NSEC_PER_MSEC)
 			);
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-- 
2.29.0.rc1.dirty


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread