From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, Tom Murphy <murphyt7@tcd.ie>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] dma-iommu: Check CONFIG_SWIOTLB more broadly
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 12:35:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210709033502.3545820-5-stevensd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210709033502.3545820-1-stevensd@google.com>
From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
Introduce a new dev_use_swiotlb function to guard swiotlb code, instead
of overloading dev_is_untrusted. This allows CONFIG_SWIOTLB to be
checked more broadly, so the swiotlb related code can be removed more
aggressively.
Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
---
drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index 0a9a9a343e64..d8a0764c69aa 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -315,6 +315,11 @@ static bool dev_is_untrusted(struct device *dev)
return dev_is_pci(dev) && to_pci_dev(dev)->untrusted;
}
+static bool dev_use_swiotlb(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SWIOTLB) && dev_is_untrusted(dev);
+}
+
/**
* iommu_dma_init_domain - Initialise a DMA mapping domain
* @domain: IOMMU domain previously prepared by iommu_get_dma_cookie()
@@ -552,8 +557,7 @@ static dma_addr_t __iommu_dma_map_swiotlb(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys,
* If both the physical buffer start address and size are
* page aligned, we don't need to use a bounce page.
*/
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SWIOTLB) && dev_is_untrusted(dev) &&
- iova_offset(iovad, phys | org_size)) {
+ if (dev_use_swiotlb(dev) && iova_offset(iovad, phys | org_size)) {
aligned_size = iova_align(iovad, org_size);
phys = swiotlb_tbl_map_single(dev, phys, org_size,
aligned_size, dir, attrs);
@@ -778,7 +782,7 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
{
phys_addr_t phys;
- if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_is_untrusted(dev))
+ if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_use_swiotlb(dev))
return;
phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(iommu_get_dma_domain(dev), dma_handle);
@@ -794,7 +798,7 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev,
{
phys_addr_t phys;
- if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_is_untrusted(dev))
+ if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_use_swiotlb(dev))
return;
phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(iommu_get_dma_domain(dev), dma_handle);
@@ -812,10 +816,10 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
struct scatterlist *sg;
int i;
- if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_is_untrusted(dev))
+ if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_use_swiotlb(dev))
return;
- if (dev_is_untrusted(dev))
+ if (dev_use_swiotlb(dev))
for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, sg_dma_address(sg),
sg->length, dir);
@@ -832,10 +836,10 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
struct scatterlist *sg;
int i;
- if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_is_untrusted(dev))
+ if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_use_swiotlb(dev))
return;
- if (dev_is_untrusted(dev))
+ if (dev_use_swiotlb(dev))
for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
iommu_dma_sync_single_for_device(dev,
sg_dma_address(sg),
@@ -996,7 +1000,7 @@ static int iommu_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
iommu_deferred_attach(dev, domain))
return 0;
- if (dev_is_untrusted(dev))
+ if (dev_use_swiotlb(dev))
return iommu_dma_map_sg_swiotlb(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC))
@@ -1071,7 +1075,7 @@ static void iommu_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC))
iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(dev, sg, nents, dir);
- if (dev_is_untrusted(dev)) {
+ if (dev_use_swiotlb(dev)) {
iommu_dma_unmap_sg_swiotlb(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
return;
}
--
2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-09 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 3:34 [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for dma-iommu swiotlb bounce buffers David Stevens
2021-07-09 3:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dma-iommu: fix sync_sg with swiotlb David Stevens
2021-08-02 13:30 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-05 3:40 ` David Stevens
2021-07-09 3:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dma-iommu: fix arch_sync_dma for map " David Stevens
2021-08-02 13:40 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-02 13:50 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-09 3:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dma-iommu: pass SKIP_CPU_SYNC to swiotlb unmap David Stevens
2021-08-02 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-05 5:26 ` David Stevens
2021-08-06 11:38 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-09 3:35 ` David Stevens [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210709033502.3545820-5-stevensd@google.com \
--to=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=murphyt7@tcd.ie \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dma-iommu: Check CONFIG_SWIOTLB more broadly' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).