From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, <lars@metafoo.de>,
<Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
<charles-antoine.couret@essensium.com>, <Nuno.Sa@analog.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7949: add adi,reference-source
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:16:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210713101642.00001262@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CCRBPUEYGCAC.CJ1Y3GDWQYYJ@shaak>
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 13:05:23 -0400
"Liam Beguin" <liambeguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Sat Jul 10, 2021 at 1:00 PM EDT, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:58:56 -0400
> > Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>
> > >
> > > Add bindings documentation for the adi,reference-source property.
> > > This property is required to properly configure the ADC sample request
> > > based on which reference source should be used for the calculation.
> >
> > Should this be per channel? That will effect some of what I say below...
> >
>
> We could make it per channel. Ideally, I'd also like to add support for
> differential channels, so might as well add per channel configurations
> now.
>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7949.yaml | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7949.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7949.yaml
> > > index 9b56bd4d5510..eae3121cad01 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7949.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7949.yaml
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,27 @@ properties:
> > > "#io-channel-cells":
> > > const: 1
> > >
> > > + adi,reference-select:
> >
> > This is one field in the register, but it's not one thing, so lets break
> > it up
> > in DT. We should do this both to make for more readable dts files and to
> > enforce the requirements on regulators...
> >
> > > + description: |
> > > + Select the reference voltage source to use when converting samples.
> > > + Acceptable values are:
> > > + - 0: Internal reference and temperature sensor enabled.
> > > + Vref=2.5V, buffered output
> > > + - 1: Internal reference and temperature sensor enabled.
> > > + Vref=4.096V, buffered output
> > > + - 2: Use external reference, temperature sensor enabled.
> > > + Internal buffer disabled
> > > + - 3: Use external reference, internal buffer and temperature sensor
> > > + enabled.
> > > + - 6: Use external reference, internal buffer and temperature sensor
> > > + disabled.
> > > + - 7: Use external reference, internal buffer enabled.
> > > + Internal reference and temperature sensor disabled.
> >
> > So question 1 is whether to use an external or internal reference.
> > Normally we'd make the coarse decision of whether to use an external
> > reference
> > by whether there is a regulator provided. That won't work so well if we
> > make
> > this per channel.
> >
> > Question 2, assuming internal reference, what voltage? Those should take
> > an actual voltage (probably in mV and match against an enum of the two
> > possible values).
> > Binding should check to make sure this isn't specified as well as saying
> > we
> > are using an external refernce.
> >
> > Question 3, assuming external reference, is temperature sensor enabled?
> > - actually dumb question, but why would anyone not want this enabled?
> > Maybe turn it
> > off in runtime pm, but in general if you've fitted a chip with a
> > temperature sensor
> > you at least sometimes want to measure temperature! So my gut feeling is
> > don't
> > allow this to be controlled (effectively drop cases 6 and 7 above as
> > being
> > unlikely to be of interest to anyone)
> >
>
> I like your suggestion of breaking this down so far, it would look
> something like this:
>
> ad7949: adc@0 {
> compatible = "adi,ad7949";
> reg = <0>;
>
> vref-supply = <&vdd_supply>;
>
> channel@0 {
> adi,internal-ref-mv = <2500>;
> reg = <0>;
> };
>
> channel@1 {
> reg = <1>;
> /*
> * defaults to vref-supply if defined or error
> * out
> */
> };
> };
>
> > Question 4, Is the internal buffer enabled when using and external
> > reference.
> > This one is interesting. We could just expose it in general, but I
> > wonder
> > if we can do something that reflects how it is used. From the various
> > figures in
> > the datasheet this seems to be coupled to whether the external reference
> > is on
> > pin REF_IN or pin REF. If that's the case can we have two optional regs
> > only
> > one of which should be supplied? However, this gets more fiddly because
> > the default right now is vref-supply actually being connected to the
> > vrefin connection.
> > That's annoying as it stops us using the obvious naming...
> > Hence I think we can have
> > vref-supply (actually connected to vrefin) and vref-unbuffered-supply
> >
>
> I really like the idea of using the same names as the datasheet
> (vref-supply and vrefin-supply), to infer the buffered state,
> but it's annoying (and confusing) that it's setup the other way
> right now.
>
> I wonder what happens if the reference is connected to refin and we're
> configured as unbuffered (and the other way around).
> I looked around and I might be able to test it on one setup I have where
> the external reference is connected to REF.
>
> If it's not a breaking change, would it be okay with you to follow the
> datasheet naming?
Absolutely. If we can get away with fixing that it would be great.
Jonathan
>
> Liam
>
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > + enum: [0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7]
> > > + default: 7
> > > +
> > > required:
> > > - compatible
> > > - reg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 15:58 [PATCH v1 0/4] AD7949 Fixes Liam Beguin
2021-07-09 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] iio: adc: ad7949: define and use bitfield names Liam Beguin
2021-07-10 16:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-10 18:17 ` Liam Beguin
2021-07-09 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] iio: adc: ad7949: fix spi messages on non 14-bit controllers Liam Beguin
2021-07-10 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-11 19:58 ` Liam Beguin
2021-07-12 10:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-09 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iio: adc: ad7949: add support for internal vref Liam Beguin
2021-07-10 17:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-09 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7949: add adi,reference-source Liam Beguin
2021-07-10 17:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-12 17:05 ` Liam Beguin
2021-07-13 9:16 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210713101642.00001262@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=Nuno.Sa@analog.com \
--cc=charles-antoine.couret@essensium.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=liambeguin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).