From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Prasad Malisetty <pmaliset@codeaurora.org>
Cc: agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, swboyd@chromium.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, svarbanov@mm-sol.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dianders@chromium.org, mka@chromium.org, vbadigan@codeaurora.org,
sallenki@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] PCIe: qcom: Add support to control pipe clk src
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:06:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210716150646.GA2098485@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1626443927-32028-5-git-send-email-pmaliset@codeaurora.org>
Run this:
$ git log --oneline drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
and make your subject match the style and structure (in particular,
s/PCIe/PCI/). In this case, maybe something like this?
PCI: qcom: Switch sc7280 gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src after PHY init
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 07:28:47PM +0530, Prasad Malisetty wrote:
> This is a new requirement for sc7280 SoC.
> To enable gdsc gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src should be TCXO.
> after PHY initialization gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src needs
> to switch from TCXO to gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk.
This says what *needs* to happen, but it doesn't actually say what
this patch *does*. I think it's something like:
On the sc7280 SoC, the clock source for pcie_1_pipe must be the TCXO
while gdsc is enabled. But after the PHY is initialized, the clock
source must be switched to gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk.
On sc7280, switch gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src from TCXO to
gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk after the PHY has been initialized.
Nits: Rewrap to fill 75 columns or so. Add blank lines between
paragraphs. Start sentences with capital letter.
> Signed-off-by: Prasad Malisetty <pmaliset@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 8a7a300..9e0e4ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 {
> struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> struct reset_control *pci_reset;
> struct clk *pipe_clk;
> + struct clk *gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src;
> + struct clk *phy_pipe_clk;
> + struct clk *ref_clk_src;
> };
>
> union qcom_pcie_resources {
> @@ -1167,6 +1170,20 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-sc7280")) {
> + res->gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src = devm_clk_get(dev, "pipe_mux");
> + if (IS_ERR(res->gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src))
> + return PTR_ERR(res->gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src);
> +
> + res->phy_pipe_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "phy_pipe");
> + if (IS_ERR(res->phy_pipe_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(res->phy_pipe_clk);
> +
> + res->ref_clk_src = devm_clk_get(dev, "ref");
> + if (IS_ERR(res->ref_clk_src))
> + return PTR_ERR(res->ref_clk_src);
Not clear why ref_clk_src is here, since it's not used anywhere. If
it's not necessary here, drop it and add it in a future patch that
uses it.
> + }
> +
> res->pipe_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pipe");
> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(res->pipe_clk);
> }
> @@ -1255,6 +1272,11 @@ static void qcom_pcie_deinit_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> {
> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_7_0;
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> +
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-sc7280"))
Using of_device_is_compatible() follows existing style in the driver,
which is good. But I'm not sure that's good style in general because
it's a little repetitious and wasteful.
qcom_pcie_probe() already calls of_device_get_match_data(), which does
basically the same thing as of_device_is_compatible(), so I think we
could take better advantage of that by augmenting struct qcom_pcie_ops
with these device-specific details.
Some drivers that use this strategy:
drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
drivers/pci/controller/pci-ftpci100.c
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> + clk_set_parent(res->gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src, res->phy_pipe_clk);
>
> return clk_prepare_enable(res->pipe_clk);
> }
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-16 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-16 13:58 [PATCH v4 0/4] Add DT bindings and DT nodes for PCIe and PHY in SC7280 Prasad Malisetty
2021-07-16 13:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: pci: qcom: Document PCIe bindings for SC720 Prasad Malisetty
2021-07-16 19:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-20 6:56 ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-07-16 13:58 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PCIe and PHY related nodes Prasad Malisetty
2021-07-16 19:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-20 6:54 ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-02 19:23 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-17 8:05 ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-07-16 13:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PCIe nodes for IDP board Prasad Malisetty
2021-07-16 19:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-20 6:57 ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-07-16 13:58 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] PCIe: qcom: Add support to control pipe clk src Prasad Malisetty
2021-07-16 15:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2021-07-16 20:38 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-07-20 11:28 ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-09 17:09 ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-07-16 19:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-16 20:31 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-07-16 21:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-16 22:11 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-07-16 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Add DT bindings and DT nodes for PCIe and PHY in SC7280 Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210716150646.GA2098485@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=pmaliset@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sallenki@codeaurora.org \
--cc=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=vbadigan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).