Hi!

> >>> vim +18 include/media/v4l2-flash-led-class.h
> >>>
> >>>     14
> >>>     15  struct led_classdev_flash;
> >>>     16  struct led_classdev;
> >>>     17  struct v4l2_flash;
> >>>   > 18  led_brightness;
> >>>     19
> >>>
> >>> ---
> 
> > 
> > Another patch was sent into the list to correct this error.
> 
> Hopefully Pavel (LED subsystem maintainer) will comment soon-ish.
> 
> My comments:
> 
> a. This patch would be the right thing to do if your large patch had already been
> applied (merged) somewhere, but AFAIK it hasn't been. So:
> 
> b. IMO you should resend your entire patch set with this fix included.
> Send it as "v2" (version 2) and explain the changes in it since your
> original patch (which was v1). This v2 explanation should be below the
> "---" line in the patch. (See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> for more info -- or ask for more info/help.)

I still remember the old patch, so b. is not strictly neccessary here.

> c. For your follow-up patch to include/media/v4l2-flash-led-class.h, which was:
> 
> -led_brightness;
> +typedef u8 led_brightness;
> 
> I would just add this to include/media/v4l2-flash-led-class.h:
> 
> #include <linux/leds.h>
> 
> That way, in a few years, when the type of led_brightness changes again,
> someone won't have to remember to search for other typedefs of it and
> update them also. Or maybe they will do that after a bug happens and
> someone notices it.
> 
> (Note that I am just trying to help. Pavel has more of a final
> say-so about this.)

And your comments are reasonable.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek