From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BE1C636C9 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E406120E for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1377394AbhGSXfY (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 19:35:24 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f44.google.com ([209.85.166.44]:40622 "EHLO mail-io1-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1392359AbhGSWGn (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:06:43 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f44.google.com with SMTP id l5so21934172iok.7; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:47:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KvZduHEK4/JPd13AvRj7Dwo91+WDf4ZZkoTysoY/Z8c=; b=C8ntqv2VbdZQLR0ghf46So1qeVVs/zRVH8+HvX8ekwXnt61iPsHBB5PdQz+bcMbrcI t5CfL+MTiVz8ZEaEU/PCcG5dAOw8oh26hW7i4Ev0QpbdD8nc8We7weivWHB+rQfQqid6 t8Owmk+m4EwJoGKmugnSgn2HMnOvkT7kDORJedPE05ADZJaXzPLNTGSbYbQvChYrwp5u Uck6PPyD/ZjfUEPNLEhO4cT6YjWfRwaEH+CXKvLj7PxzwK2c/2ymEH8vh9WzSk25Lxel lid6a+Xrjva1u4IIkwp1x9HB1lz7ZuwxX2lq7zL1rNRFgXhwj/5EXcxQ8JTfDqVS0PJ2 3asA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321Z+feDVh/LHNpMVlc4jxBaLJ6ii/pEjd4E7BGuTQYqLmIAzJ9 caeKZBCNdHK1CW1TjYbc/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2z9Xre7CdCLPouoO6dfskCrk/L/I3dMKprr4kx+Phkn3qCMvEw/eDabtuZvzFiQhg1hdthg== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:fe03:: with SMTP id x3mr1146470ioh.120.1626734842302; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:47:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org ([64.188.179.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10sm10283737ilo.17.2021.07.19.15.47.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 2767559 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 22:47:18 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:47:18 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Chuanjia Liu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, jianjun.wang@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bhelgaas@google.com, ryder.lee@mediatek.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Frank Wunderlich , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, yong.wu@mediatek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek: Update the Device tree bindings Message-ID: <20210719224718.GA2766057@robh.at.kernel.org> References: <20210719073456.28666-1-chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com> <20210719073456.28666-2-chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210719073456.28666-2-chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:34:53 +0800, Chuanjia Liu wrote: > There are two independent PCIe controllers in MT2712 and MT7622 > platform. Each of them should contain an independent MSI domain. > > In old dts architecture, MSI domain will be inherited from the root > bridge, and all of the devices will share the same MSI domain. > Hence that, the PCIe devices will not work properly if the irq number > which required is more than 32. > > Split the PCIe node for MT2712 and MT7622 platform to comply with > the hardware design and fix MSI issue. > > Signed-off-by: Chuanjia Liu > Acked-by: Ryder Lee > --- > .../bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-cfg.yaml | 39 ++++ > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.txt | 206 ++++++++++-------- > 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-cfg.yaml > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.