linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	ast@kernel.org, andriin@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	atenart@kernel.org, alobakin@pm.me, weiwan@google.com,
	ap420073@gmail.com, jeyu@kernel.org, ngupta@vflare.org,
	sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, minchan@kernel.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk, mbenes@suse.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, keescook@chromium.org, jikos@kernel.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] test_sysfs: demonstrate deadlock fix
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:36:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210722223612.bdkdolndhnr4yogt@garbanzo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPgGIncQxcD2frBY@kroah.com>

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:33:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 10:28:28AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 06:49:46AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 05:46:32PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > +#define MODULE_DEVICE_ATTR_FUNC_STORE(_name) \
> > > > +static ssize_t module_ ## _name ## _store(struct device *dev, \
> > > > +				   struct device_attribute *attr, \
> > > > +				   const char *buf, size_t len) \
> > > > +{ \
> > > > +	ssize_t __ret; \
> > > > +	if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) \
> > > > +		return -ENODEV; \
> > > > +	__ret = _name ## _store(dev, attr, buf, len); \
> > > > +	module_put(THIS_MODULE); \
> > > > +	return __ret; \
> > > > +}
> > > 
> > > As I have pointed out before, doing try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) is racy
> > > and should not be added back to the kernel tree.  We got rid of many
> > > instances of this "bad pattern" over the years, please do not encourage
> > > it to be added back as others will somehow think that it correct code.
> > 
> > It is noted this is used in lieu of any agreed upon solution to
> > *demonstrate* how this at least does fix it. In this case (and in the
> > generic solution I also had suggested for kernfs a while ago), if the
> > try fails, we give up. If it succeeds, we now know we can rely on the
> > device pointer. If the refcount succeeds, can the module still not
> > be present? Is try_module_get() racy in that way? In what way is it
> > racy and where is this documented? Do we have a selftest to prove the
> > race?
> 
> As I say in the other email where you tried to add this, think about
> what happens if the module is removed _right before_ you make this call.
> 
> Or a few instructions before that.  The race is still there, this fixes
> nothing except make the window smaller.

The kernfs active reference ensures that if the file is open the module
must still exist. As such, the use within sysfs files should be safe
as the module is the one in charge of removing the files.

  Luis

      reply	other threads:[~2021-07-22 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-03  0:46 [PATCH v2 0/4] selftests: add a new test driver for sysfs Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-03  0:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] selftests: add tests_sysfs module Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-21 11:32   ` Greg KH
2021-07-22 22:34     ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-23 10:38       ` Greg KH
2021-07-23 17:32         ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-03  0:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] kernfs: add initial failure injection support Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-03  0:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] test_sysfs: add support to use kernfs failure injection Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-03  0:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] test_sysfs: demonstrate deadlock fix Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-03  4:49   ` Greg KH
2021-07-03 17:28     ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-21 11:33       ` Greg KH
2021-07-22 22:36         ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210722223612.bdkdolndhnr4yogt@garbanzo \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alobakin@pm.me \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=weiwan@google.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] test_sysfs: demonstrate deadlock fix' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).