linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Charles Gorand <charles.gorand@effinnov.com>,
	Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@samsung.com>,
	Mark Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com>,
	Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] nfc: constify nfc_digital_ops
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 23:49:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210724214928.122096-7-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210724214743.121884-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>

Neither the core nor the drivers modify the passed pointer to struct
nfc_digital_ops, so make it a pointer to const for correctness and safety.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/nfc/port100.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
 drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c    | 2 +-
 include/net/nfc/digital.h | 4 ++--
 net/nfc/digital_core.c    | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
index a9864fcdfba6..143dc49b815b 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int nfcsim_tg_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout,
 	return nfcsim_send(ddev, NULL, timeout, cb, arg);
 }
 
-static struct nfc_digital_ops nfcsim_digital_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops nfcsim_digital_ops = {
 	.in_configure_hw = nfcsim_in_configure_hw,
 	.in_send_cmd = nfcsim_in_send_cmd,
 
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
index 1d614f9d864a..ccb5c5fab905 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ static int port100_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout,
 	return port100_tg_send_cmd(ddev, skb, timeout, cb, arg);
 }
 
-static struct nfc_digital_ops port100_digital_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops port100_digital_ops = {
 	.in_configure_hw = port100_in_configure_hw,
 	.in_send_cmd = port100_in_send_cmd,
 
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 2dc788c363fd..993818742570 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -1037,7 +1037,7 @@ static void st95hf_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev)
 {
 }
 
-static struct nfc_digital_ops st95hf_nfc_digital_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops st95hf_nfc_digital_ops = {
 	.in_configure_hw = st95hf_in_configure_hw,
 	.in_send_cmd = st95hf_in_send_cmd,
 
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
index 33978022ae47..1aed44629aaa 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@ static void trf7970a_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev)
 	mutex_unlock(&trf->lock);
 }
 
-static struct nfc_digital_ops trf7970a_nfc_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops trf7970a_nfc_ops = {
 	.in_configure_hw	= trf7970a_in_configure_hw,
 	.in_send_cmd		= trf7970a_send_cmd,
 	.tg_configure_hw	= trf7970a_tg_configure_hw,
diff --git a/include/net/nfc/digital.h b/include/net/nfc/digital.h
index 963db96bcbbb..bb3e8fdc0692 100644
--- a/include/net/nfc/digital.h
+++ b/include/net/nfc/digital.h
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ struct digital_poll_tech {
 
 struct nfc_digital_dev {
 	struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev;
-	struct nfc_digital_ops *ops;
+	const struct nfc_digital_ops *ops;
 
 	u32 protocols;
 
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ struct nfc_digital_dev {
 	void (*skb_add_crc)(struct sk_buff *skb);
 };
 
-struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
+struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(const struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
 						    __u32 supported_protocols,
 						    __u32 driver_capabilities,
 						    int tx_headroom,
diff --git a/net/nfc/digital_core.c b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
index 8f2572decccd..fefc03674f4f 100644
--- a/net/nfc/digital_core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static const struct nfc_ops digital_nfc_ops = {
 	.im_transceive = digital_in_send,
 };
 
-struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
+struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(const struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
 					    __u32 supported_protocols,
 					    __u32 driver_capabilities,
 					    int tx_headroom, int tx_tailroom)
-- 
2.27.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-24 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-24 21:47 [PATCH 00/12] nfc: constify data structures Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:47 ` [PATCH 01/12] nfc: constify payload argument in nci_send_cmd() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:47 ` [PATCH 02/12] nfc: constify nci_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:47 ` [PATCH 03/12] nfc: s3fwrn5: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:47 ` [PATCH 04/12] nfc: constify nci_driver_ops (prop_ops and core_ops) Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:47 ` [PATCH 05/12] nfc: constify nfc_phy_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 06/12] nfc: st21nfca: constify file-scope arrays Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 07/12] nfc: constify pointer to nfc_vendor_cmd Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 08/12] nfc: constify nfc_hci_gate Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 09/12] nfc: constify nfc_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 10/12] nfc: constify nfc_hci_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 11/12] nfc: constify nfc_llc_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2021-07-25  8:30 ` [PATCH 00/12] nfc: constify data structures patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210724214928.122096-7-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=bongsu.jeon@samsung.com \
    --cc=charles.gorand@effinnov.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=k.opasiak@samsung.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgreer@animalcreek.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 12/12] nfc: constify nfc_digital_ops' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).