From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@anirudhrb.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] firmware_loader: use -ETIMEDOUT instead of -EAGAIN in fw_load_sysfs_fallback
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:07:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210726180744.crfvxbuyz2bjw2o2@garbanzo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210724121134.6364-2-mail@anirudhrb.com>
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 05:41:33PM +0530, Anirudh Rayabharam wrote:
> The only motivation for using -EAGAIN in commit 0542ad88fbdd81bb
> ("firmware loader: Fix _request_firmware_load() return val for fw load
> abort") was to distinguish the error from -ENOMEM, and so there is no
> real reason in keeping it. -EAGAIN is typically used to tell the
> userspace to try something again and in this case re-using the sysfs
> loading interface cannot be retried when a timeout happens, so the
> return value is also bogus.
>
> -ETIMEDOUT is received when the wait times out and returning that
> is much more telling of what the reason for the failure was. So, just
> propagate that instead of returning -EAGAIN.
>
> Suggested-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@anirudhrb.com>
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Beautiful.
As you see, without any of this documented in a commit log, the change
would have been very obscure. Now we cleary document a userspace
changing return value clearly.
Thanks!
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-26 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-24 12:11 [PATCH v7 0/2] firmware_loader: fix uaf in firmware_fallback_sysfs Anirudh Rayabharam
2021-07-24 12:11 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] firmware_loader: use -ETIMEDOUT instead of -EAGAIN in fw_load_sysfs_fallback Anirudh Rayabharam
2021-07-26 16:56 ` Shuah Khan
2021-07-26 18:07 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2021-07-24 12:11 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] firmware_loader: fix use-after-free in firmware_fallback_sysfs Anirudh Rayabharam
2021-07-26 17:22 ` Shuah Khan
2021-07-26 18:27 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-27 12:57 ` Anirudh Rayabharam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210726180744.crfvxbuyz2bjw2o2@garbanzo \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@anirudhrb.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).