From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcu/nocb: Check for migratability rather than pure preemptability
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:08:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210727230814.GC283787@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721115118.729943-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com>
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:51:17PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index ad0156b86937..6c3c4100da83 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -70,8 +70,7 @@ static bool rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> !(lockdep_is_held(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex) ||
> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && lockdep_is_cpus_held()) ||
> rcu_lockdep_is_held_nocb(rdp) ||
> - (rdp == this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data) &&
> - !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && preemptible())) ||
> + (rdp == this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data) && is_pcpu_safe()) ||
I fear that won't work. We really need any caller of rcu_rdp_is_offloaded()
on the local rdp to have preemption disabled and not just migration disabled,
because we must protect against concurrent offloaded state changes.
The offloaded state is changed by a workqueue that executes on the target rdp.
Here is a practical example where it matters:
CPU 0
-----
// =======> task rcuc running
rcu_core {
rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags) {
if (!rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(rdp->cblist)) {
// is not offloaded right now, so it's going
// to just disable IRQs. Oh no wait:
// preemption
// ========> workqueue running
rcu_nocb_rdp_offload();
// ========> task rcuc resume
local_irq_disable();
}
}
....
rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags) {
if (rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(rdp->cblist)) {
// is offloaded right now so:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
And that will explode because that's an impaired unlock on nocb_lock.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-21 11:51 [PATCH 0/3] sched: migrate_disable() vs per-CPU access safety checks Valentin Schneider
2021-07-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: Introduce is_pcpu_safe() Valentin Schneider
2021-07-27 16:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-07-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] rcu/nocb: Check for migratability rather than pure preemptability Valentin Schneider
2021-07-27 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-07-27 23:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-07-28 19:34 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-07-28 22:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-07-29 1:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-07-29 10:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-07-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: mm: Make arch_faults_on_old_pte() check for migratability Valentin Schneider
2021-07-27 19:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] sched: migrate_disable() vs per-CPU access safety checks Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210727230814.GC283787@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).