From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@linux.ibm.com>,
Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@redhat.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] init: move usermodehelper_enable() to populate_rootfs()
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:46:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210728134638.329060-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
Currently, usermodehelper is enabled right before PID1 starts going
through the initcalls. However, any call of a usermodehelper from a
pure_, core_, postcore_, arch_, subsys_ or fs_ initcall is futile, as
there is no filesystem contents yet.
Up until commit e7cb072eb988 ("init/initramfs.c: do unpacking
asynchronously"), such calls, whether via some request_module(), a
legacy uevent "/sbin/hotplug" notification or something else, would
just fail silently with (presumably) -ENOENT from
kernel_execve(). However, that commit introduced the
wait_for_initramfs() synchronization hook which must be called from
the usermodehelper exec path right before the kernel_execve, in order
that request_module() et al done from *after* rootfs_initcall()
time (i.e. device_ and late_ initcalls) would continue to find a
populated initramfs as they used to.
Any call of wait_for_initramfs() done before the unpacking has been
scheduled (i.e. before rootfs_initcall time) must just return
immediately [and let the caller find an empty file system] in order
not to deadlock the machine. I mistakenly thought, and my limited
testing confirmed, that there were no such calls, so I added a
pr_warn_once() in wait_for_initramfs(). It turns out that one can
indeed hit request_module() as well as kobject_uevent_env() during
those early init calls, leading to a user-visible warning in the
kernel log emitted consistently for certain configurations.
We could just remove the pr_warn_once(), but I think it's better to
postpone enabling the usermodehelper framework until there is at least
some chance of finding the executable. That is also a little more
efficient in that a lot of work done in umh.c will be elided. However,
it does change the error seen by those early callers from -ENOENT to
-EBUSY, so there is a risk of a regression if any caller care about
the exact error value.
Reported-by: Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Fixes: e7cb072eb988 ("init/initramfs.c: do unpacking asynchronously")
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---
init/initramfs.c | 2 ++
init/main.c | 1 -
init/noinitramfs.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/init/initramfs.c b/init/initramfs.c
index af27abc59643..a842c0544745 100644
--- a/init/initramfs.c
+++ b/init/initramfs.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/init_syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/umh.h>
static ssize_t __init xwrite(struct file *file, const char *p, size_t count,
loff_t *pos)
@@ -727,6 +728,7 @@ static int __init populate_rootfs(void)
{
initramfs_cookie = async_schedule_domain(do_populate_rootfs, NULL,
&initramfs_domain);
+ usermodehelper_enable();
if (!initramfs_async)
wait_for_initramfs();
return 0;
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index f5b8246e8aa1..d5c5542fe142 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -1387,7 +1387,6 @@ static void __init do_basic_setup(void)
driver_init();
init_irq_proc();
do_ctors();
- usermodehelper_enable();
do_initcalls();
}
diff --git a/init/noinitramfs.c b/init/noinitramfs.c
index 3d62b07f3bb9..d1d26b93d25c 100644
--- a/init/noinitramfs.c
+++ b/init/noinitramfs.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/kdev_t.h>
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/init_syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/umh.h>
/*
* Create a simple rootfs that is similar to the default initramfs
@@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ static int __init default_rootfs(void)
{
int err;
+ usermodehelper_enable();
err = init_mkdir("/dev", 0755);
if (err < 0)
goto out;
--
2.31.1
reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210728134638.329060-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=egorenar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).