From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@linux.ibm.com>, Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@redhat.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] init: move usermodehelper_enable() to populate_rootfs() Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:46:37 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210728134638.329060-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw) Currently, usermodehelper is enabled right before PID1 starts going through the initcalls. However, any call of a usermodehelper from a pure_, core_, postcore_, arch_, subsys_ or fs_ initcall is futile, as there is no filesystem contents yet. Up until commit e7cb072eb988 ("init/initramfs.c: do unpacking asynchronously"), such calls, whether via some request_module(), a legacy uevent "/sbin/hotplug" notification or something else, would just fail silently with (presumably) -ENOENT from kernel_execve(). However, that commit introduced the wait_for_initramfs() synchronization hook which must be called from the usermodehelper exec path right before the kernel_execve, in order that request_module() et al done from *after* rootfs_initcall() time (i.e. device_ and late_ initcalls) would continue to find a populated initramfs as they used to. Any call of wait_for_initramfs() done before the unpacking has been scheduled (i.e. before rootfs_initcall time) must just return immediately [and let the caller find an empty file system] in order not to deadlock the machine. I mistakenly thought, and my limited testing confirmed, that there were no such calls, so I added a pr_warn_once() in wait_for_initramfs(). It turns out that one can indeed hit request_module() as well as kobject_uevent_env() during those early init calls, leading to a user-visible warning in the kernel log emitted consistently for certain configurations. We could just remove the pr_warn_once(), but I think it's better to postpone enabling the usermodehelper framework until there is at least some chance of finding the executable. That is also a little more efficient in that a lot of work done in umh.c will be elided. However, it does change the error seen by those early callers from -ENOENT to -EBUSY, so there is a risk of a regression if any caller care about the exact error value. Reported-by: Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@linux.ibm.com> Reported-by: Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@redhat.com> Reported-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Fixes: e7cb072eb988 ("init/initramfs.c: do unpacking asynchronously") Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> --- init/initramfs.c | 2 ++ init/main.c | 1 - init/noinitramfs.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/init/initramfs.c b/init/initramfs.c index af27abc59643..a842c0544745 100644 --- a/init/initramfs.c +++ b/init/initramfs.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/namei.h> #include <linux/init_syscalls.h> +#include <linux/umh.h> static ssize_t __init xwrite(struct file *file, const char *p, size_t count, loff_t *pos) @@ -727,6 +728,7 @@ static int __init populate_rootfs(void) { initramfs_cookie = async_schedule_domain(do_populate_rootfs, NULL, &initramfs_domain); + usermodehelper_enable(); if (!initramfs_async) wait_for_initramfs(); return 0; diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c index f5b8246e8aa1..d5c5542fe142 100644 --- a/init/main.c +++ b/init/main.c @@ -1387,7 +1387,6 @@ static void __init do_basic_setup(void) driver_init(); init_irq_proc(); do_ctors(); - usermodehelper_enable(); do_initcalls(); } diff --git a/init/noinitramfs.c b/init/noinitramfs.c index 3d62b07f3bb9..d1d26b93d25c 100644 --- a/init/noinitramfs.c +++ b/init/noinitramfs.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/kdev_t.h> #include <linux/syscalls.h> #include <linux/init_syscalls.h> +#include <linux/umh.h> /* * Create a simple rootfs that is similar to the default initramfs @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ static int __init default_rootfs(void) { int err; + usermodehelper_enable(); err = init_mkdir("/dev", 0755); if (err < 0) goto out; -- 2.31.1
reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 13:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210728134638.329060-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \ --to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=bgoncalv@redhat.com \ --cc=egorenar@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] init: move usermodehelper_enable() to populate_rootfs()' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).