archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rasmus Villemoes <>
To: Andrew Morton <>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <>,
	Luis Chamberlain <>
	Alexander Egorenkov <>,
	Bruno Goncalves <>,
	Heiner Kallweit <>,
Subject: [PATCH] init: move usermodehelper_enable() to populate_rootfs()
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:46:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

Currently, usermodehelper is enabled right before PID1 starts going
through the initcalls. However, any call of a usermodehelper from a
pure_, core_, postcore_, arch_, subsys_ or fs_ initcall is futile, as
there is no filesystem contents yet.

Up until commit e7cb072eb988 ("init/initramfs.c: do unpacking
asynchronously"), such calls, whether via some request_module(), a
legacy uevent "/sbin/hotplug" notification or something else, would
just fail silently with (presumably) -ENOENT from
kernel_execve(). However, that commit introduced the
wait_for_initramfs() synchronization hook which must be called from
the usermodehelper exec path right before the kernel_execve, in order
that request_module() et al done from *after* rootfs_initcall()
time (i.e. device_ and late_ initcalls) would continue to find a
populated initramfs as they used to.

Any call of wait_for_initramfs() done before the unpacking has been
scheduled (i.e. before rootfs_initcall time) must just return
immediately [and let the caller find an empty file system] in order
not to deadlock the machine. I mistakenly thought, and my limited
testing confirmed, that there were no such calls, so I added a
pr_warn_once() in wait_for_initramfs(). It turns out that one can
indeed hit request_module() as well as kobject_uevent_env() during
those early init calls, leading to a user-visible warning in the
kernel log emitted consistently for certain configurations.

We could just remove the pr_warn_once(), but I think it's better to
postpone enabling the usermodehelper framework until there is at least
some chance of finding the executable. That is also a little more
efficient in that a lot of work done in umh.c will be elided. However,
it does change the error seen by those early callers from -ENOENT to
-EBUSY, so there is a risk of a regression if any caller care about
the exact error value.

Reported-by: Alexander Egorenkov <>
Reported-by: Bruno Goncalves <>
Reported-by: Heiner Kallweit <>
Fixes: e7cb072eb988 ("init/initramfs.c: do unpacking asynchronously")
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <>
 init/initramfs.c   | 2 ++
 init/main.c        | 1 -
 init/noinitramfs.c | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/init/initramfs.c b/init/initramfs.c
index af27abc59643..a842c0544745 100644
--- a/init/initramfs.c
+++ b/init/initramfs.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/namei.h>
 #include <linux/init_syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/umh.h>
 static ssize_t __init xwrite(struct file *file, const char *p, size_t count,
 		loff_t *pos)
@@ -727,6 +728,7 @@ static int __init populate_rootfs(void)
 	initramfs_cookie = async_schedule_domain(do_populate_rootfs, NULL,
+	usermodehelper_enable();
 	if (!initramfs_async)
 	return 0;
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index f5b8246e8aa1..d5c5542fe142 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -1387,7 +1387,6 @@ static void __init do_basic_setup(void)
-	usermodehelper_enable();
diff --git a/init/noinitramfs.c b/init/noinitramfs.c
index 3d62b07f3bb9..d1d26b93d25c 100644
--- a/init/noinitramfs.c
+++ b/init/noinitramfs.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/kdev_t.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/init_syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/umh.h>
  * Create a simple rootfs that is similar to the default initramfs
@@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ static int __init default_rootfs(void)
 	int err;
+	usermodehelper_enable();
 	err = init_mkdir("/dev", 0755);
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto out;

                 reply	other threads:[~2021-07-28 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] init: move usermodehelper_enable() to populate_rootfs()' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).