From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46842C4320A for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C41F6069E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229739AbhG2R4B (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:56:01 -0400 Received: from mail-co1nam11on2053.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.220.53]:24085 "EHLO NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229485AbhG2Rz7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:55:59 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=BdOI83OAg/g7tvVmLttOdveacwLrP8TwlxM6/aBulqga6pbKG6HxKH4I6Gxt28v5vdXAwefgnjk6GkKHKo2zmKdROjSgl49DV5V83yXipeSQPgp8D2coCtITqq/ZZBhlpdshffZW1e7/NIDB5FjDqo1J8hbOFKt+CPZih61XN7tDUwWYielJN0qgdcxBl5UFwPdu1ufFkcvLSDZ7ym45dgqmUyQ94m6w2wEHiJQJE+iYZXYgcyW+/nwr0qGOLJt3kQe2CBSr133H6F3NGrjVZZJgNxXCj4nMGAP8NjHgodBSVHQVKIq7K7m91NZhCAtvRR70yOk/U0WXy7otJljDkw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4SFnW1+GgmVoB2HAfX5izGAzI4mmsRhpyCH8dWkdZOo=; b=MxwCaSSiRgBMntnYSzwpRcmP6K7MWR6XuNZzJK5+SBtluOB0qawCrc8HV1CRJc0NpUVAZfsij5VXjPbHXGs345mV7F141Lpqg/x92E0bQz8F/r5WAoQWxduVzdwMrv774gdw49NoGKiu/PKnGeHVvmVIqqOcUXuNHedrmMI3DFiFOZw7d6bwY+Sogy5hFR4J0uxA91FfdfvvIfBA2pevs82djGAAEoLqnEiJACj8TvdYwrP1BKp14N5/PHH7X3VmbhT5ToyjncYOhOCcx2jSH7HlvYsiM33zWV3KC+co8JJgfoLsibwFE9frAXgBmbti3lrZsazZjKMLmBX76kJ38A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=pass header.d=amd.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4SFnW1+GgmVoB2HAfX5izGAzI4mmsRhpyCH8dWkdZOo=; b=CP1ZWTvAdFw+xkiDcKeTxvZ1DEt1bNj+gDiSecrXr2J/eO+9wJvl2I+hGJO1Waa1Lzvv8HAaDkpc0ulLIqZnMWKGuyFwuvCBp8duTUaRdyTvDRQxWK5h0JMHsBg9wZJpmv98owxTnHeEBCfmZcIIuHZS8ZF0lcjCTJ/n85+aa2A= Authentication-Results: amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;amd.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=amd.com; Received: from BN8PR12MB3108.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:40::20) by BN8PR12MB2883.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:98::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4373.18; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:55:52 +0000 Received: from BN8PR12MB3108.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c099:e7a1:249a:a8a2]) by BN8PR12MB3108.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c099:e7a1:249a:a8a2%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4352.033; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:55:52 +0000 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:55:49 -0400 From: Yazen Ghannam To: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, mingo@redhat.com, mchehab@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] EDAC/amd64: Enumerate memory on noncpu nodes Message-ID: <20210729175549.GB4318@aus-x-yghannam.amd.com> References: <20210630152828.162659-1-nchatrad@amd.com> <20210630152828.162659-6-nchatrad@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210630152828.162659-6-nchatrad@amd.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: BN6PR21CA0006.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:8e::16) To BN8PR12MB3108.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:40::20) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from aus-x-yghannam.amd.com (165.204.25.250) by BN6PR21CA0006.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:8e::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4394.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:55:51 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 66a148fd-e0b9-48a0-1757-08d952ba1b18 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN8PR12MB2883: X-MS-Exchange-Transport-Forked: True X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:741; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:BN8PR12MB3108.namprd12.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(55016002)(8676002)(7696005)(6636002)(83380400001)(52116002)(956004)(30864003)(86362001)(8936002)(4326008)(44832011)(33656002)(38350700002)(5660300002)(38100700002)(2906002)(316002)(186003)(6862004)(478600001)(66556008)(26005)(66476007)(66946007)(1076003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?us-ascii?Q?u0v9W+6ir/YO6OKsgI2oakQrH0Im3mAl9Z+S1/1EbmT+RKywMdnxCJHKLAKO?= =?us-ascii?Q?UEpLubL1pnec62KgjHpHR28KWAtj1VR0UjJaHkuCrM7Wok3S1TWaUcFH268K?= =?us-ascii?Q?cUDb/t8jqeULDC9Vl7oRgGWs4AK/03nbe93lker1fJTVg/pUSFOJaKokUuT8?= =?us-ascii?Q?m/lz/hU5olOr1Kh/60uOOIf4tQY6Eaq8dVC4493u5i4A5OdKUuCx/p1l1uUb?= =?us-ascii?Q?VXGAo2CN843hzLTXrt61fqKqH+RwI+2kSRcL2yiUXa/WWt/DGqPueIYM9epF?= =?us-ascii?Q?Cak09xVL8GVpDvVMTumBeEFdhXeW14FKpp01Z7KW9fs1J18/CbQj+TD2efIc?= =?us-ascii?Q?Lp9ybpVKcLJJY7x3RdCYrJO7/8KASdZhRK41au1sMGkYeLhAKe0/R8O8IIWE?= =?us-ascii?Q?bUIzJs88QOCk9r6Ot5lZhmiQb98u/e7dzlIqJ9WxCwT9AoMqzAx8GIKcvZ0a?= =?us-ascii?Q?svU16ngpWqo5Jtll9GbnwR5UB9LvPmQcTlQQ3dL8aC+ly99eCVskltIZIzyM?= =?us-ascii?Q?4oa+5O/9xzopMtYgDcS+cfNeK8ft4NIwxlHgg3ivIyCt+8TJjboTje7VW/Cr?= =?us-ascii?Q?6evVRY4EOMIoH4PVJe9oadSNMjEKd8nLS4ZhZy2IstHSKfMADR6+T+DIPt9/?= =?us-ascii?Q?uOXyVM62BjmO4ZYFadOpS/XDvSZiGbtzD5CqKH5kbjhTz8BKYW24D6Sc7aaa?= =?us-ascii?Q?qP7AD+hs22uvKvgOMTJAJ/uw5P0DAS376rM+f80mnOng9ojOMfSa0g9m5sM0?= =?us-ascii?Q?wW7+iAJ/yKCPGtnLEzVoFfNd8HlJV7rh3fgtLrkxf8nSzrZPz6qULzO4yLeK?= =?us-ascii?Q?5NdzeukKiIFzbOHvGrwhMy4NztoBADyaXum23FzJB1e8keYcNna+4Wsn6E+8?= =?us-ascii?Q?c4ncTnNgvz5iXRebU1HC9oKX9y+9LdC1ginxNDD6xlilXsFd/g+sUoO5pa8G?= =?us-ascii?Q?z97FpqlZSZsVnhNoFCMvZh1ZqkYWapgnq6L4bvsrHIWHVhX4Vp7RCe15BwGg?= =?us-ascii?Q?eeDqJkFBEqxmQeEq1FikeBdLEVEn5DskjyeCK6dGxIeU8QN70ucP4rdoaI4M?= =?us-ascii?Q?gevPldk4BfTkgaX/RV9mQ8+2bctOw4wQALVugPyqp9jhsyUQ3U0B8aFw8mLs?= =?us-ascii?Q?0URhHg3ONiTSsZjg80lHe9hOboMx3F2tXx+MPI/Ot11DYXR8qKBUD8DBIeCS?= =?us-ascii?Q?XwKlqWBR8KQRBPvL7UfjU9W1J6Ib60PMHLfGuGXIxjZkvyLkemlbgcZHGrXz?= =?us-ascii?Q?+VbsnYtxWKJk4NRfvigfsL+6iaq/SuZr0ioF5ahsTWnVITfX05Kj1r9LYj64?= =?us-ascii?Q?9Y34AwoISOLc13WJN3/cA6g0?= X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 66a148fd-e0b9-48a0-1757-08d952ba1b18 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8PR12MB3108.namprd12.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2021 17:55:52.5671 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: QRsK7/nLuTYbCV1ufO2c3WSHgvZP90W7ekuCJzBybWljsRpiS1JYEDf2gzHkqEywLjmUlIUkiIRw28xkD+zYUQ== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR12MB2883 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 08:58:26PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > On newer heterogeneous systems from AMD with GPU nodes connected via > xGMI links to the CPUs, the GPU dies are interfaced with HBM2 memory. > > This patch modifies the amd64_edac module to handle the HBM memory > enumeration leveraging the existing edac and the amd64 specific data > structures. > > The UMC Phys on GPU nodes are enumerated as csrows > The UMC channels connected to HBMs are enumerated as ranks > Please make sure there is some imperative statement in the commit message. And watch out for grammar, punctuation, etc. > Signed-off-by: Muralidhara M K > Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi > --- > drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 300 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h | 27 ++++ > 2 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c > index 25c6362e414b..8fe0a5e3c8f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c > +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c > @@ -1741,6 +1741,9 @@ static unsigned long determine_edac_cap(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > > if (umc_en_mask == dimm_ecc_en_mask) > edac_cap = EDAC_FLAG_SECDED; > + > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) > + edac_cap = EDAC_FLAG_EC; This flag means "Error Checking - no correction". Is that appropriate for these devices? > } else { > bit = (pvt->fam > 0xf || pvt->ext_model >= K8_REV_F) > ? 19 > @@ -1799,6 +1802,9 @@ static int f17_get_cs_mode(int dimm, u8 ctrl, struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > { > int cs_mode = 0; > > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) > + return CS_EVEN_PRIMARY | CS_ODD_PRIMARY; > + Why do this function call if the values are hard-coded? I think you can just set them below. > if (csrow_enabled(2 * dimm, ctrl, pvt)) > cs_mode |= CS_EVEN_PRIMARY; > > @@ -1818,6 +1824,15 @@ static void debug_display_dimm_sizes_df(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl) > > edac_printk(KERN_DEBUG, EDAC_MC, "UMC%d chip selects:\n", ctrl); > > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) { > + cs_mode = f17_get_cs_mode(cs0, ctrl, pvt); > + for_each_chip_select(cs0, ctrl, pvt) { > + size0 = pvt->ops->dbam_to_cs(pvt, ctrl, cs_mode, cs0); > + amd64_info(EDAC_MC ": %d: %5dMB\n", cs0, size0); So this puts each chip select size on a new line rather than grouping by twos. Is there a logical or physical reason for the difference? > + } > + return; > + } > + > for (dimm = 0; dimm < 2; dimm++) { > cs0 = dimm * 2; > cs1 = dimm * 2 + 1; > @@ -1833,43 +1848,53 @@ static void debug_display_dimm_sizes_df(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl) > } > } > > -static void __dump_misc_regs_df(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > +static void dump_umcch_regs(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, int i) > { > - struct amd64_umc *umc; > - u32 i, tmp, umc_base; > - > - for_each_umc(i) { > - umc_base = get_umc_base(i); > - umc = &pvt->umc[i]; > + struct amd64_umc *umc = &pvt->umc[i]; > + u32 tmp, umc_base; > > - edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d DIMM cfg: 0x%x\n", i, umc->dimm_cfg); > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) { > edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d UMC cfg: 0x%x\n", i, umc->umc_cfg); > edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d SDP ctrl: 0x%x\n", i, umc->sdp_ctrl); > edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d ECC ctrl: 0x%x\n", i, umc->ecc_ctrl); > + edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d All HBMs support ECC: yes\n", i); > + return; > + } > > - amd_smn_read(pvt->mc_node_id, umc_base + UMCCH_ECC_BAD_SYMBOL, &tmp); > - edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d ECC bad symbol: 0x%x\n", i, tmp); > - > - amd_smn_read(pvt->mc_node_id, umc_base + UMCCH_UMC_CAP, &tmp); > - edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d UMC cap: 0x%x\n", i, tmp); > - edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d UMC cap high: 0x%x\n", i, umc->umc_cap_hi); > - > - edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d ECC capable: %s, ChipKill ECC capable: %s\n", > - i, (umc->umc_cap_hi & BIT(30)) ? "yes" : "no", > - (umc->umc_cap_hi & BIT(31)) ? "yes" : "no"); > - edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d All DIMMs support ECC: %s\n", > - i, (umc->umc_cfg & BIT(12)) ? "yes" : "no"); > - edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d x4 DIMMs present: %s\n", > - i, (umc->dimm_cfg & BIT(6)) ? "yes" : "no"); > - edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d x16 DIMMs present: %s\n", > - i, (umc->dimm_cfg & BIT(7)) ? "yes" : "no"); > - > - if (pvt->dram_type == MEM_LRDDR4) { > - amd_smn_read(pvt->mc_node_id, umc_base + UMCCH_ADDR_CFG, &tmp); > - edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d LRDIMM %dx rank multiply\n", > - i, 1 << ((tmp >> 4) & 0x3)); > - } > + umc_base = get_umc_base(i); > + > + edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d DIMM cfg: 0x%x\n", i, umc->dimm_cfg); > + > + amd_smn_read(pvt->mc_node_id, umc_base + UMCCH_ECC_BAD_SYMBOL, &tmp); > + edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d ECC bad symbol: 0x%x\n", i, tmp); > + > + amd_smn_read(pvt->mc_node_id, umc_base + UMCCH_UMC_CAP, &tmp); > + edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d UMC cap: 0x%x\n", i, tmp); > + edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d UMC cap high: 0x%x\n", i, umc->umc_cap_hi); > > + edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d ECC capable: %s, ChipKill ECC capable: %s\n", > + i, (umc->umc_cap_hi & BIT(30)) ? "yes" : "no", > + (umc->umc_cap_hi & BIT(31)) ? "yes" : "no"); > + edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d All DIMMs support ECC: %s\n", > + i, (umc->umc_cfg & BIT(12)) ? "yes" : "no"); > + edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d x4 DIMMs present: %s\n", > + i, (umc->dimm_cfg & BIT(6)) ? "yes" : "no"); > + edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d x16 DIMMs present: %s\n", > + i, (umc->dimm_cfg & BIT(7)) ? "yes" : "no"); > + > + if (pvt->dram_type == MEM_LRDDR4) { > + amd_smn_read(pvt->mc_node_id, umc_base + UMCCH_ADDR_CFG, &tmp); > + edac_dbg(1, "UMC%d LRDIMM %dx rank multiply\n", > + i, 1 << ((tmp >> 4) & 0x3)); > + } > +} > + > +static void __dump_misc_regs_df(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for_each_umc(i) { > + dump_umcch_regs(pvt, i); > debug_display_dimm_sizes_df(pvt, i); > } > > @@ -1937,10 +1962,14 @@ static void prep_chip_selects(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > pvt->csels[0].m_cnt = pvt->csels[1].m_cnt = 2; > } else if (pvt->fam >= 0x17) { > int umc; > - > for_each_umc(umc) { > - pvt->csels[umc].b_cnt = 4; > - pvt->csels[umc].m_cnt = 2; > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) { > + pvt->csels[umc].b_cnt = 8; > + pvt->csels[umc].m_cnt = 8; > + } else { > + pvt->csels[umc].b_cnt = 4; > + pvt->csels[umc].m_cnt = 2; > + } > } > > } else { > @@ -1949,6 +1978,31 @@ static void prep_chip_selects(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > } > } > > +static void read_noncpu_umc_base_mask(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > +{ > + u32 base_reg, mask_reg; > + u32 *base, *mask; > + int umc, cs; > + > + for_each_umc(umc) { > + for_each_chip_select(cs, umc, pvt) { > + base_reg = get_noncpu_umc_base(umc, cs) + UMCCH_BASE_ADDR; > + base = &pvt->csels[umc].csbases[cs]; > + > + if (!amd_smn_read(pvt->mc_node_id, base_reg, base)) > + edac_dbg(0, " DCSB%d[%d]=0x%08x reg: 0x%x\n", > + umc, cs, *base, base_reg); > + > + mask_reg = get_noncpu_umc_base(umc, cs) + UMCCH_ADDR_MASK; > + mask = &pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[cs]; > + > + if (!amd_smn_read(pvt->mc_node_id, mask_reg, mask)) > + edac_dbg(0, " DCSM%d[%d]=0x%08x reg: 0x%x\n", > + umc, cs, *mask, mask_reg); > + } > + } > +} > + > static void read_umc_base_mask(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > { > u32 umc_base_reg, umc_base_reg_sec; > @@ -2009,8 +2063,12 @@ static void read_dct_base_mask(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > > prep_chip_selects(pvt); > > - if (pvt->umc) > - return read_umc_base_mask(pvt); > + if (pvt->umc) { > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) > + return read_noncpu_umc_base_mask(pvt); > + else > + return read_umc_base_mask(pvt); > + } > > for_each_chip_select(cs, 0, pvt) { > int reg0 = DCSB0 + (cs * 4); > @@ -2056,6 +2114,10 @@ static void determine_memory_type(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > u32 dram_ctrl, dcsm; > > if (pvt->umc) { > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) { > + pvt->dram_type = MEM_HBM2; > + return; > + } > if ((pvt->umc[0].dimm_cfg | pvt->umc[1].dimm_cfg) & BIT(5)) > pvt->dram_type = MEM_LRDDR4; > else if ((pvt->umc[0].dimm_cfg | pvt->umc[1].dimm_cfg) & BIT(4)) > @@ -2445,7 +2507,10 @@ static int f17_early_channel_count(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > > /* SDP Control bit 31 (SdpInit) is clear for unused UMC channels */ > for_each_umc(i) > - channels += !!(pvt->umc[i].sdp_ctrl & UMC_SDP_INIT); > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) > + channels += pvt->csels[i].b_cnt; > + else > + channels += !!(pvt->umc[i].sdp_ctrl & UMC_SDP_INIT); > > amd64_info("MCT channel count: %d\n", channels); > > @@ -2586,6 +2651,12 @@ static int f17_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, > u32 msb, weight, num_zero_bits; > int dimm, size = 0; > > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) { > + addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[csrow_nr]; > + /* The memory channels in case of GPUs are fully populated */ > + goto skip_noncpu; > + } > + > /* No Chip Selects are enabled. */ > if (!cs_mode) > return size; > @@ -2611,6 +2682,7 @@ static int f17_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc, > else > addr_mask_orig = pvt->csels[umc].csmasks[dimm]; > > + skip_noncpu: > /* > * The number of zero bits in the mask is equal to the number of bits > * in a full mask minus the number of bits in the current mask. > @@ -3356,6 +3428,16 @@ static struct amd64_family_type family_types[] = { > .dbam_to_cs = f17_addr_mask_to_cs_size, > } > }, > + [ALDEBARAN_GPUS] = { > + .ctl_name = "ALDEBARAN", > + .f0_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_ALDEBARAN_DF_F0, > + .f6_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_ALDEBARAN_DF_F6, > + .max_mcs = 4, > + .ops = { > + .early_channel_count = f17_early_channel_count, > + .dbam_to_cs = f17_addr_mask_to_cs_size, > + } > + }, > }; > > /* > @@ -3611,6 +3693,19 @@ static int find_umc_channel(struct mce *m) > return (m->ipid & GENMASK(31, 0)) >> 20; > } > > +/* > + * The HBM memory managed by the UMCCH of the noncpu node > + * can be calculated based on the [15:12]bits of IPID as follows > + */ > +static int find_umc_channel_noncpu(struct mce *m) > +{ > + u8 umc, ch; > + > + umc = find_umc_channel(m); > + ch = ((m->ipid >> 12) & 0xf); > + return umc % 2 ? (ch + 4) : ch; > +} > + > static void decode_umc_error(int node_id, struct mce *m) > { > u8 ecc_type = (m->status >> 45) & 0x3; > @@ -3618,6 +3713,7 @@ static void decode_umc_error(int node_id, struct mce *m) > struct amd64_pvt *pvt; > struct err_info err; > u64 sys_addr = m->addr; > + u8 umc_num; > > mci = edac_mc_find(node_id); > if (!mci) > @@ -3630,7 +3726,16 @@ static void decode_umc_error(int node_id, struct mce *m) > if (m->status & MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED) > ecc_type = 3; > > - err.channel = find_umc_channel(m); > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) { > + err.csrow = find_umc_channel(m) / 2; > + /* The UMC channel is reported as the csrow in case of the noncpu nodes */ > + err.channel = find_umc_channel_noncpu(m); > + umc_num = err.csrow * 8 + err.channel; > + } else { > + err.channel = find_umc_channel(m); > + err.csrow = m->synd & 0x7; > + umc_num = err.channel; > + } > > if (!(m->status & MCI_STATUS_SYNDV)) { > err.err_code = ERR_SYND; > @@ -3646,9 +3751,7 @@ static void decode_umc_error(int node_id, struct mce *m) > err.err_code = ERR_CHANNEL; > } > > - err.csrow = m->synd & 0x7; > - > - if (umc_normaddr_to_sysaddr(&sys_addr, pvt->mc_node_id, err.channel)) { > + if (umc_normaddr_to_sysaddr(&sys_addr, pvt->mc_node_id, umc_num)) { > err.err_code = ERR_NORM_ADDR; > goto log_error; > } > @@ -3775,15 +3878,20 @@ static void __read_mc_regs_df(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > > /* Read registers from each UMC */ > for_each_umc(i) { > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) > + umc_base = get_noncpu_umc_base(i, 0); > + else > + umc_base = get_umc_base(i); > > - umc_base = get_umc_base(i); > umc = &pvt->umc[i]; > - > - amd_smn_read(nid, umc_base + UMCCH_DIMM_CFG, &umc->dimm_cfg); > amd_smn_read(nid, umc_base + UMCCH_UMC_CFG, &umc->umc_cfg); > amd_smn_read(nid, umc_base + UMCCH_SDP_CTRL, &umc->sdp_ctrl); > amd_smn_read(nid, umc_base + UMCCH_ECC_CTRL, &umc->ecc_ctrl); > - amd_smn_read(nid, umc_base + UMCCH_UMC_CAP_HI, &umc->umc_cap_hi); > + > + if (!pvt->is_noncpu) { > + amd_smn_read(nid, umc_base + UMCCH_DIMM_CFG, &umc->dimm_cfg); > + amd_smn_read(nid, umc_base + UMCCH_UMC_CAP_HI, &umc->umc_cap_hi); > + } > } > } > > @@ -3865,7 +3973,9 @@ static void read_mc_regs(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > determine_memory_type(pvt); > edac_dbg(1, " DIMM type: %s\n", edac_mem_types[pvt->dram_type]); > > - determine_ecc_sym_sz(pvt); > + /* ECC symbol size is not available on NONCPU nodes */ > + if (!pvt->is_noncpu) > + determine_ecc_sym_sz(pvt); > } > > /* > @@ -3953,15 +4063,21 @@ static int init_csrows_df(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) > continue; > > empty = 0; > - dimm = mci->csrows[cs]->channels[umc]->dimm; > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) { > + dimm = mci->csrows[umc]->channels[cs]->dimm; > + dimm->edac_mode = EDAC_SECDED; > + dimm->dtype = DEV_X16; > + } else { > + dimm->edac_mode = edac_mode; > + dimm->dtype = dev_type; > + dimm = mci->csrows[cs]->channels[umc]->dimm; This last line should go before the other two. > + } > > edac_dbg(1, "MC node: %d, csrow: %d\n", > pvt->mc_node_id, cs); > > dimm->nr_pages = get_csrow_nr_pages(pvt, umc, cs); > dimm->mtype = pvt->dram_type; > - dimm->edac_mode = edac_mode; > - dimm->dtype = dev_type; > dimm->grain = 64; > } > } > @@ -4226,7 +4342,9 @@ static bool ecc_enabled(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > > umc_en_mask |= BIT(i); > > - if (umc->umc_cap_hi & UMC_ECC_ENABLED) > + /* ECC is enabled by default on NONCPU nodes */ > + if (pvt->is_noncpu || > + (umc->umc_cap_hi & UMC_ECC_ENABLED)) > ecc_en_mask |= BIT(i); > } > > @@ -4262,6 +4380,11 @@ f17h_determine_edac_ctl_cap(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > { > u8 i, ecc_en = 1, cpk_en = 1, dev_x4 = 1, dev_x16 = 1; > > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) { > + mci->edac_ctl_cap |= EDAC_SECDED; > + return; > + } > + > for_each_umc(i) { > if (pvt->umc[i].sdp_ctrl & UMC_SDP_INIT) { > ecc_en &= !!(pvt->umc[i].umc_cap_hi & UMC_ECC_ENABLED); > @@ -4292,7 +4415,11 @@ static void setup_mci_misc_attrs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) > { > struct amd64_pvt *pvt = mci->pvt_info; > > - mci->mtype_cap = MEM_FLAG_DDR2 | MEM_FLAG_RDDR2; > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) > + mci->mtype_cap = MEM_FLAG_HBM2; > + else > + mci->mtype_cap = MEM_FLAG_DDR2 | MEM_FLAG_RDDR2; > + > mci->edac_ctl_cap = EDAC_FLAG_NONE; > > if (pvt->umc) { > @@ -4397,11 +4524,25 @@ static struct amd64_family_type *per_family_init(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > fam_type = &family_types[F17_M70H_CPUS]; > pvt->ops = &family_types[F17_M70H_CPUS].ops; > fam_type->ctl_name = "F19h_M20h"; > - break; > + } else if (pvt->model >= 0x30 && pvt->model <= 0x3f) { > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) { > + int tmp = 0; > + > + fam_type = &family_types[ALDEBARAN_GPUS]; > + pvt->ops = &family_types[ALDEBARAN_GPUS].ops; > + tmp = pvt->mc_node_id - NONCPU_NODE_INDEX; This can be set when you declare it. > + sprintf(pvt->buf, "Aldebaran#%ddie#%d", tmp / 2, tmp % 2); > + fam_type->ctl_name = pvt->buf; > + } else { > + fam_type = &family_types[F19_CPUS]; > + pvt->ops = &family_types[F19_CPUS].ops; > + fam_type->ctl_name = "F19h_M30h"; > + } > + } else { > + fam_type = &family_types[F19_CPUS]; > + pvt->ops = &family_types[F19_CPUS].ops; > + family_types[F19_CPUS].ctl_name = "F19h"; > } > - fam_type = &family_types[F19_CPUS]; > - pvt->ops = &family_types[F19_CPUS].ops; > - family_types[F19_CPUS].ctl_name = "F19h"; > break; > > default: > @@ -4454,6 +4595,30 @@ static void hw_info_put(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > kfree(pvt->umc); > } > > +static void populate_layers(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, struct edac_mc_layer *layers) > +{ > + if (pvt->is_noncpu) { > + layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT; > + layers[0].size = fam_type->max_mcs; > + layers[0].is_virt_csrow = true; > + layers[1].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL; > + layers[1].size = pvt->csels[0].b_cnt; > + layers[1].is_virt_csrow = false; This looks mostly the same as below but the sizes are different. Can't you keep all this together and just adjust the sizes? > + } else { > + layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT; > + layers[0].size = pvt->csels[0].b_cnt; > + layers[0].is_virt_csrow = true; > + layers[1].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL; > + /* > + * Always allocate two channels since we can have setups with > + * DIMMs on only one channel. Also, this simplifies handling > + * later for the price of a couple of KBs tops. > + */ > + layers[1].size = fam_type->max_mcs; > + layers[1].is_virt_csrow = false; > + } > +} > + > static int init_one_instance(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > { > struct mem_ctl_info *mci = NULL; > @@ -4469,19 +4634,8 @@ static int init_one_instance(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) > if (pvt->channel_count < 0) > return ret; > > - ret = -ENOMEM; > - layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT; > - layers[0].size = pvt->csels[0].b_cnt; > - layers[0].is_virt_csrow = true; > - layers[1].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL; > - > - /* > - * Always allocate two channels since we can have setups with DIMMs on > - * only one channel. Also, this simplifies handling later for the price > - * of a couple of KBs tops. > - */ > - layers[1].size = fam_type->max_mcs; > - layers[1].is_virt_csrow = false; > + /* Define layers for CPU and NONCPU nodes */ > + populate_layers(pvt, layers); > > mci = edac_mc_alloc(pvt->mc_node_id, ARRAY_SIZE(layers), layers, 0); > if (!mci) > @@ -4525,6 +4679,9 @@ static int probe_one_instance(unsigned int nid) > struct ecc_settings *s; > int ret; > > + if (!F3) > + return -EINVAL; > + Why is this needed? > ret = -ENOMEM; > s = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ecc_settings), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!s) > @@ -4536,6 +4693,9 @@ static int probe_one_instance(unsigned int nid) > if (!pvt) > goto err_settings; > > + if (nid >= NONCPU_NODE_INDEX) > + pvt->is_noncpu = true; > + > pvt->mc_node_id = nid; > pvt->F3 = F3; > > @@ -4609,6 +4769,10 @@ static void remove_one_instance(unsigned int nid) > struct mem_ctl_info *mci; > struct amd64_pvt *pvt; > > + /* Nothing to remove for the space holder entries */ > + if (!F3) > + return; > + > /* Remove from EDAC CORE tracking list */ > mci = edac_mc_del_mc(&F3->dev); > if (!mci) > @@ -4682,7 +4846,7 @@ static int __init amd64_edac_init(void) > > for (i = 0; i < amd_nb_num(); i++) { > err = probe_one_instance(i); > - if (err) { > + if (err && (err != -EINVAL)) { If the !F3 condition above is "okay", why not just return 0 (success)? > /* unwind properly */ > while (--i >= 0) > remove_one_instance(i); > diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h > index 85aa820bc165..6d5f7b3afc83 100644 > --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h > +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h > @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M70H_DF_F6 0x1446 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_DF_F0 0x1650 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_DF_F6 0x1656 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_ALDEBARAN_DF_F0 0x14D0 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_ALDEBARAN_DF_F6 0x14D6 > These are correct. > /* > * Function 1 - Address Map > @@ -298,6 +300,7 @@ enum amd_families { > F17_M60H_CPUS, > F17_M70H_CPUS, > F19_CPUS, > + ALDEBARAN_GPUS, > NUM_FAMILIES, > }; > > @@ -389,6 +392,9 @@ struct amd64_pvt { > enum mem_type dram_type; > > struct amd64_umc *umc; /* UMC registers */ > + char buf[20]; > + > + u8 is_noncpu; Can this be a "bool"? > }; > > enum err_codes { > @@ -410,6 +416,27 @@ struct err_info { > u32 offset; > }; > > +static inline u32 get_noncpu_umc_base(u8 umc, u8 channel) > +{ > + /* > + * On the NONCPU nodes, base address is calculated based on > + * UMC channel and the HBM channel. > + * > + * UMC channels are selected in 6th nibble > + * UMC chY[3:0]= [(chY*2 + 1) : (chY*2)]50000; > + * > + * HBM channels are selected in 3rd nibble > + * HBM chX[3:0]= [Y ]5X[3:0]000; > + * HBM chX[7:4]= [Y+1]5X[3:0]000 > + */ > + umc *= 2; > + > + if (channel / 4) Can this be "if (channel >= 4)"? > + umc++; > + > + return 0x50000 + (umc << 20) + ((channel % 4) << 12); > +} > + > static inline u32 get_umc_base(u8 channel) > { > /* chY: 0xY50000 */ > -- There are a lot of changes in this patch. I think you should give the highlights in the commit message. For example, you may want to say if you introduced new functions, changed code flow, etc., and why this is needed compared to existing systems. I think the code comments have some details, but a summary in the commit message may help. Thanks, Yazen