From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>, Luis Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcg: Disable task obj_stock for PREEMPT_RT Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:55:19 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210803175519.22298-1-longman@redhat.com> (raw) For PREEMPT_RT kernel, preempt_disable() and local_irq_save() are typically converted to local_lock() and local_lock_irqsave() respectively. These two variants of local_lock() are essentially the same. Thus, there is no performance advantage in choosing one over the other. As there is no point in maintaining two different sets of obj_stock, it is simpler and more efficient to just disable task_obj and use only irq_obj for PREEMPT_RT. However, task_obj will still be there in the memcg_stock_pcp structure even though it is not used in this configuration. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 87c883227f90..4f80770cb97b 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -2120,12 +2120,22 @@ static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock, * which is cheap in non-preempt kernel. The interrupt context object stock * can only be accessed after disabling interrupt. User context code can * access interrupt object stock, but not vice versa. + * + * For PREEMPT_RT kernel, preempt_disable() and local_irq_save() may have + * to be changed to variants of local_lock(). This eliminates the + * performance advantage of using preempt_disable(). Fall back to always + * use local_irq_save() and use only irq_obj for simplicity. */ +static inline bool use_task_obj_stock(void) +{ + return !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && likely(in_task()); +} + static inline struct obj_stock *get_obj_stock(unsigned long *pflags) { struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock; - if (likely(in_task())) { + if (use_task_obj_stock()) { *pflags = 0UL; preempt_disable(); stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock); @@ -2139,7 +2149,7 @@ static inline struct obj_stock *get_obj_stock(unsigned long *pflags) static inline void put_obj_stock(unsigned long flags) { - if (likely(in_task())) + if (use_task_obj_stock()) preempt_enable(); else local_irq_restore(flags); @@ -2212,7 +2222,7 @@ static void drain_local_stock(struct work_struct *dummy) stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock); drain_obj_stock(&stock->irq_obj); - if (in_task()) + if (use_task_obj_stock()) drain_obj_stock(&stock->task_obj); drain_stock(stock); clear_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags); @@ -3217,7 +3227,7 @@ static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock, { struct mem_cgroup *memcg; - if (in_task() && stock->task_obj.cached_objcg) { + if (use_task_obj_stock() && stock->task_obj.cached_objcg) { memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(stock->task_obj.cached_objcg); if (memcg && mem_cgroup_is_descendant(memcg, root_memcg)) return true; -- 2.18.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-08-03 17:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-03 17:55 Waiman Long [this message] 2021-08-03 23:21 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-08-04 1:40 ` Waiman Long 2021-08-04 8:52 ` Michal Hocko 2021-08-04 16:00 ` Waiman Long 2021-08-04 7:39 ` Vlastimil Babka 2021-08-04 8:33 ` Michal Hocko 2021-08-09 9:07 ` Michal Hocko 2021-08-09 9:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210803175519.22298-1-longman@redhat.com \ --to=longman@redhat.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=guro@fb.com \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \ --cc=shakeelb@google.com \ --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \ --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \ --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: Disable task obj_stock for PREEMPT_RT' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).