From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBB0C4338F for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 05:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DFE60F41 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 05:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235442AbhHDFsc (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 01:48:32 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:30792 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235012AbhHDFsa (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 01:48:30 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10065"; a="201040671" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,293,1620716400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="201040671" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Aug 2021 22:48:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,293,1620716400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="479969434" Received: from zhen-hp.sh.intel.com (HELO zhen-hp) ([10.239.160.143]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Aug 2021 22:48:14 -0700 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:26:06 +0800 From: Zhenyu Wang To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , Greg KH , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Joonas Lahtinen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jani Nikula , Gerd Hoffmann , "Vivi, Rodrigo" , "intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Wang, Zhi A" Subject: Re: refactor the i915 GVT support Message-ID: <20210804052606.GG13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> Reply-To: Zhenyu Wang References: <20210721155355.173183-1-hch@lst.de> <20210722112636.wj277vqhg4dez5ug@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20210727121224.GA2145868@nvidia.com> <20210728175925.GU1721383@nvidia.com> <20210729072022.GB31896@lst.de> <20210803094315.GF13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> <20210803143058.GA1721383@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1SVgZ+3xbDF9VW5n" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210803143058.GA1721383@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --1SVgZ+3xbDF9VW5n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2021.08.03 11:30:58 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:43:15PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang > >=20 > > Thanks a lot for this effort! >=20 > Great, do we have a submission plan for this? how much does it clash > with my open_device/etc patch? ie does the whole thing have to go > through the vfio tree? >=20 I think Alex would determine when to merge open_device series, gvt part can be through vfio tree without problem. For this refactor, I would first merge for gvt staging to do more regression testing before sending through i915 tree. Thanks --1SVgZ+3xbDF9VW5n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTXuabgHDW6LPt9CICxBBozTXgYJwUCYQok3wAKCRCxBBozTXgY J5caAJ40TmBXSY9oMyHAvup4EhMUzcv+fACgkIVPVmaSfgOPAjUn4UZv/iNQst0= =tcld -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1SVgZ+3xbDF9VW5n--