linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
To: marcel@holtmann.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com,
	luiz.dentz@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com
Cc: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/6] Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in SCO
Date: Wed,  4 Aug 2021 23:47:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210804154712.929986-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804154712.929986-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>

Since sco_sock_timeout is now scheduled using delayed work, it is no
longer run in SOFTIRQ context. Hence bh_lock_sock is no longer
necessary in SCO to synchronise between user contexts and SOFTIRQ
processing.

As such, calls to bh_lock_sock should be replaced with lock_sock to
synchronize with other concurrent processes that use lock_sock.

Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/sco.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/sco.c b/net/bluetooth/sco.c
index 558f8874b65e..1246e6bc09fe 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/sco.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/sco.c
@@ -93,10 +93,10 @@ static void sco_sock_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	BT_DBG("sock %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state);
 
-	bh_lock_sock(sk);
+	lock_sock(sk);
 	sk->sk_err = ETIMEDOUT;
 	sk->sk_state_change(sk);
-	bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+	release_sock(sk);
 
 	sco_sock_kill(sk);
 	sock_put(sk);
@@ -199,10 +199,10 @@ static void sco_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err)
 
 	if (sk) {
 		sock_hold(sk);
-		bh_lock_sock(sk);
+		lock_sock(sk);
 		sco_sock_clear_timer(sk);
 		sco_chan_del(sk, err);
-		bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+		release_sock(sk);
 		sco_sock_kill(sk);
 		sock_put(sk);
 
@@ -1111,10 +1111,10 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn)
 
 	if (sk) {
 		sco_sock_clear_timer(sk);
-		bh_lock_sock(sk);
+		lock_sock(sk);
 		sk->sk_state = BT_CONNECTED;
 		sk->sk_state_change(sk);
-		bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+		release_sock(sk);
 	} else {
 		sco_conn_lock(conn);
 
@@ -1129,12 +1129,12 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn)
 			return;
 		}
 
-		bh_lock_sock(parent);
+		lock_sock(parent);
 
 		sk = sco_sock_alloc(sock_net(parent), NULL,
 				    BTPROTO_SCO, GFP_ATOMIC, 0);
 		if (!sk) {
-			bh_unlock_sock(parent);
+			release_sock(parent);
 			sco_conn_unlock(conn);
 			return;
 		}
@@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn)
 		/* Wake up parent */
 		parent->sk_data_ready(parent);
 
-		bh_unlock_sock(parent);
+		release_sock(parent);
 
 		sco_conn_unlock(conn);
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-04 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-04 15:47 [RESEND PATCH v5 0/6] Bluetooth: fix locking and socket killing in SCO and RFCOMM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 15:47 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 1/6] Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-05 19:06   ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2021-08-09  4:04     ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-09 16:42       ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2021-08-04 15:47 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 2/6] Bluetooth: avoid circular locks in sco_sock_connect Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 15:47 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi [this message]
2021-08-04 15:47 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 4/6] Bluetooth: serialize calls to sco_sock_{set,clear}_timer Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 15:47 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 5/6] Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in RFCOMM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-08-04 15:47 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 6/6] Bluetooth: fix repeated calls to sco_sock_kill Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210804154712.929986-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \
    --to=desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).