linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@ti.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp,
	yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] PCI: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti PCIe host controller driver
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:59:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210805105908.GA19244@lpieralisi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210723221421.113575-3-nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>

On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 07:14:20AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Add support to PCIe RC controller on Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs. PCIe
> controller is based of Synopsys DesignWare PCIe core.
> 
> This patch does not yet use the clock framework to control the clock.
> This will be replaced in the future.

This is not relevant information. I expect the commit log to describe
the change and the reasons behind the choices.

Speaking of which, I'd like to understand what

> This patch does not yet use the clock framework to control the clock.

means and why it can't be done within this series.

> Signed-off-by: Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig         |   9 +
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile        |   1 +
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c | 333 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 343 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> index 423d35872ce4..7c3dcb86fcad 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> @@ -286,6 +286,15 @@ config PCIE_TEGRA194_EP
>  	  in order to enable device-specific features PCIE_TEGRA194_EP must be
>  	  selected. This uses the DesignWare core.
>  
> +config PCIE_VISCONTI_HOST
> +	bool "Toshiba Visconti PCIe controllers"
> +	depends on ARCH_VISCONTI || COMPILE_TEST
> +	depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> +	select PCIE_DW_HOST
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here if you want PCIe controller support on Toshiba Visconti SoC.
> +	  This driver supports TMPV7708 SoC.
> +
>  config PCIE_UNIPHIER
>  	bool "Socionext UniPhier PCIe host controllers"
>  	depends on ARCH_UNIPHIER || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> index eca805c1a023..0b569d54deb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MESON) += pci-meson.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER_EP) += pcie-uniphier-ep.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_VISCONTI_HOST) += pcie-visconti.o
>  
>  # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI
>  # pci_root.c driver but don't support standard ECAM config access.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f01a670cdf5d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * DWC PCIe RC driver for Toshiba Visconti ARM SoC
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Toshiba Electronic Device & Storage Corporation
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 TOSHIBA CORPORATION
> + *
> + * Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/resource.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include "pcie-designware.h"
> +#include "../../pci.h"
> +
> +struct visconti_pcie {
> +	struct dw_pcie pci;
> +	void __iomem *ulreg_base;
> +	void __iomem *smu_base;
> +	void __iomem *mpu_base;
> +	struct clk *refclk;
> +	struct clk *coreclk;
> +	struct clk *auxclk;
> +};
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE		0x00F4
> +#define  PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_EP	0x00
> +#define  PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_RC	0x04
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL	0x00F8
> +#define  PCIE_UL_IOM_PCIE_PERSTN_I_EN	BIT(3)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN_EN	BIT(2)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_PERSTN_OUT		BIT(1)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN		BIT(0)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL_INIT	(PCIE_UL_IOM_PCIE_PERSTN_I_EN | \
> +					 PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN_EN | \
> +					 PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_02	0x0104
> +#define  PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_EXT_LD_DONE	BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_03	0x0108
> +#define  PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_INIT_DONE	BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1	0x0138
> +#define  PCIE_UL_CFG_PME_INT		BIT(0)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_CFG_LINK_EQ_REQ_INT	BIT(1)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT0		BIT(2)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT1		BIT(3)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT2		BIT(4)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT3		BIT(5)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1_ALL  (PCIE_UL_CFG_PME_INT | \
> +					 PCIE_UL_CFG_LINK_EQ_REQ_INT | \
> +					 PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT0 | \
> +					 PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT1 | \
> +					 PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT2 | \
> +					 PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT3)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_SB_MON		0x0198
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_SIG_MON		0x019C
> +#define  PCIE_UL_CORE_RST_N_MON		BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_DBG_00	0x0844
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01	0x0860
> +#define  PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE	BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_00		0x0864
> +#define  PCIE_UL_SMLH_LINK_UP		BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02		0x0868
> +#define  PCIE_UL_S_DETECT_ACT		0x01
> +#define  PCIE_UL_S_L0			0x11
> +
> +#define PISMU_CKON_PCIE			0x0038
> +#define  PISMU_CKON_PCIE_AUX_CLK	BIT(1)
> +#define  PISMU_CKON_PCIE_MSTR_ACLK	BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE		0x0538
> +#define  PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_ULREG_RST_N	BIT(1)
> +#define  PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_PWR_UP_RST_N	BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN		0x0
> +#define  MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE		BIT(0)
> +
> +/* Access registers in PCIe ulreg */
> +static void visconti_ulreg_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
> +{
> +	writel_relaxed(val, pcie->ulreg_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 visconti_ulreg_readl(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 reg)
> +{
> +	return readl_relaxed(pcie->ulreg_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +/* Access registers in PCIe smu */
> +static void visconti_smu_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
> +{
> +	writel_relaxed(val, pcie->smu_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +/* Access registers in PCIe mpu */
> +static void visconti_mpu_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
> +{
> +	writel_relaxed(val, pcie->mpu_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 visconti_mpu_readl(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 reg)
> +{
> +	return readl_relaxed(pcie->mpu_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int visconti_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> +	struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> +	void __iomem *addr = pcie->ulreg_base;
> +	u32 val = readl_relaxed(addr + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02);
> +
> +	return !!(val & PCIE_UL_S_L0);
> +}
> +
> +static int visconti_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> +	struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> +	void __iomem *addr = pcie->ulreg_base;
> +	u32 val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE,
> +			      PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01);
> +
> +	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02,
> +					 val, (val & PCIE_UL_S_L0),
> +					 90000, 100000);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1_ALL,
> +			      PCIE_UL_REG_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1);
> +
> +	if (dw_pcie_link_up(pci)) {
> +		val = visconti_mpu_readl(pcie, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> +		visconti_mpu_writel(pcie, val & ~MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE,
> +				    PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void visconti_pcie_stop_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> +	struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	val = visconti_ulreg_readl(pcie, PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01);
> +	val &= ~PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE;
> +	visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01);
> +
> +	val = visconti_mpu_readl(pcie, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> +	visconti_mpu_writel(pcie, val | MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * In this SoC specification, the CPU bus outputs the offset value from
> + * 0x40000000 to the PCIE bus, so 0x40000000 is subtracted from the CPU
> + * bus address. This 0x40000000 is also based on io_base from DT.
> + */
> +static u64 visconti_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup(struct dw_pcie *pci, u64 cpu_addr)
> +{
> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> +
> +	return cpu_addr & ~pp->io_base;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> +	.cpu_addr_fixup = visconti_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup,
> +	.link_up = visconti_pcie_link_up,
> +	.start_link = visconti_pcie_start_link,
> +	.stop_link = visconti_pcie_stop_link,
> +};
> +
> +static int visconti_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +	struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> +	void __iomem *addr;
> +	int err;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	visconti_smu_writel(pcie,
> +			    PISMU_CKON_PCIE_AUX_CLK | PISMU_CKON_PCIE_MSTR_ACLK,
> +			    PISMU_CKON_PCIE);
> +	ndelay(250);
> +
> +	visconti_smu_writel(pcie, PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_ULREG_RST_N,
> +			    PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE);
> +	visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_RC,
> +			      PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE);
> +
> +	val = PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL_INIT;
> +	visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL);
> +	udelay(100);
> +
> +	val |= PCIE_UL_PERSTN_OUT;
> +	visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL);
> +	udelay(100);
> +
> +	visconti_smu_writel(pcie, PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_PWR_UP_RST_N,
> +			    PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE);
> +
> +	addr = pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_03;
> +	err = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr, val,
> +					 (val & PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_INIT_DONE),
> +					 100, 1000);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_EXT_LD_DONE,
> +			      PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_02);
> +
> +	addr = pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_S_SIG_MON;
> +	return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr, val,
> +					  (val & PCIE_UL_CORE_RST_N_MON), 100,
> +					  1000);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops visconti_pcie_host_ops = {
> +	.host_init = visconti_pcie_host_init,
> +};
> +
> +static int visconti_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				  struct visconti_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> +	pcie->ulreg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "ulreg");
> +	if (IS_ERR(pcie->ulreg_base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(pcie->ulreg_base);
> +
> +	pcie->smu_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "smu");
> +	if (IS_ERR(pcie->smu_base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(pcie->smu_base);
> +
> +	pcie->mpu_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "mpu");
> +	if (IS_ERR(pcie->mpu_base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(pcie->mpu_base);
> +
> +	pcie->refclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ref");
> +	if (IS_ERR(pcie->refclk))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->refclk),
> +				     "Failed to get ref clock\n");
> +
> +	pcie->coreclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "core");
> +	if (IS_ERR(pcie->coreclk))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->coreclk),
> +				     "Failed to get core clock\n");
> +
> +	pcie->auxclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "aux");
> +	if (IS_ERR(pcie->auxclk))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->auxclk),
> +				     "Failed to get aux clock\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +visconti_add_pcie_port(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, struct platform_device *pdev)

Nit: don't split lines like this, it is better to keep return value
type and function name in one single line.

Do it like this:

static int visconti_add_pcie_port(struct visconti_pcie *pcie,
 				  struct platform_device *pdev)

Lorenzo

> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> +	pp->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "intr");
> +	if (pp->irq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Interrupt intr is missing");
> +		return pp->irq;
> +	}
> +
> +	pp->ops = &visconti_pcie_host_ops;
> +
> +	return dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> +}
> +
> +static int visconti_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct visconti_pcie *pcie;
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pcie)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pci = &pcie->pci;
> +	pci->dev = dev;
> +	pci->ops = &dw_pcie_ops;
> +
> +	ret = visconti_get_resources(pdev, pcie);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> +
> +	return visconti_add_pcie_port(pcie, pdev);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id visconti_pcie_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "toshiba,visconti-pcie" },
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver visconti_pcie_driver = {
> +	.probe = visconti_pcie_probe,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "visconti-pcie",
> +		.of_match_table = visconti_pcie_match,
> +		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +builtin_platform_driver(visconti_pcie_driver);
> -- 
> 2.32.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-05 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-23 22:14 [PATCH v5 0/3] Visconti: " Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2021-07-23 22:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pci: Add DT binding for Toshiba Visconti PCIe controller Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2021-07-23 23:19   ` Rob Herring
2021-07-23 22:14 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] PCI: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti PCIe host controller driver Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2021-08-05 10:59   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2021-08-06  2:30     ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2021-07-23 22:14 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Add entries for Toshiba Visconti PCIe controller Nobuhiro Iwamatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210805105908.GA19244@lpieralisi \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp \
    --cc=punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] PCI: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti PCIe host controller driver' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).