From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: [patch V3 55/64] futex: Cleanup stale comments
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 17:13:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210805153955.997745091@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210805151300.330412127@linutronix.de
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The futex key reference mechanism is long gone. Cleanup the stale comments
which still mention it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V2: Cleanup more key ref comments - Andre
---
kernel/futex.c | 18 +++++++-----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ static int lock_pi_update_atomic(u32 __u
* - 1 - acquired the lock;
* - <0 - error
*
- * The hb->lock and futex_key refs shall be held by the caller.
+ * The hb->lock must be held by the caller.
*
* @exiting is only set when the return value is -EBUSY. If so, this holds
* a refcount on the exiting task on return and the caller needs to drop it
@@ -2621,8 +2621,7 @@ static void futex_wait_queue_me(struct f
*
* Setup the futex_q and locate the hash_bucket. Get the futex value and
* compare it with the expected value. Handle atomic faults internally.
- * Return with the hb lock held and a q.key reference on success, and unlocked
- * with no q.key reference on failure.
+ * Return with the hb lock held on success, and unlocked on failure.
*
* Return:
* - 0 - uaddr contains val and hb has been locked;
@@ -2700,8 +2699,8 @@ static int futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr,
current->timer_slack_ns);
retry:
/*
- * Prepare to wait on uaddr. On success, holds hb lock and increments
- * q.key refs.
+ * Prepare to wait on uaddr. On success, it holds hb->lock and q
+ * is initialized.
*/
ret = futex_wait_setup(uaddr, val, flags, &q, &hb);
if (ret)
@@ -2712,7 +2711,6 @@ static int futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr,
/* If we were woken (and unqueued), we succeeded, whatever. */
ret = 0;
- /* unqueue_me() drops q.key ref */
if (!unqueue_me(&q))
goto out;
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
@@ -3205,8 +3203,8 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __u
q.requeue_pi_key = &key2;
/*
- * Prepare to wait on uaddr. On success, increments q.key (key1) ref
- * count.
+ * Prepare to wait on uaddr. On success, it holds hb->lock and q
+ * is initialized.
*/
ret = futex_wait_setup(uaddr, val, flags, &q, &hb);
if (ret)
@@ -3235,9 +3233,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __u
* In order for us to be here, we know our q.key == key2, and since
* we took the hb->lock above, we also know that futex_requeue() has
* completed and we no longer have to concern ourselves with a wakeup
- * race with the atomic proxy lock acquisition by the requeue code. The
- * futex_requeue dropped our key1 reference and incremented our key2
- * reference count.
+ * race with the atomic proxy lock acquisition by the requeue code.
*/
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-05 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-05 15:13 [patch V3 00/64] locking, sched: The PREEMPT-RT locking infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 01/64] sched: Split out the wakeup state check Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 02/64] sched: Introduce TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 03/64] sched: Reorganize current::__state helpers Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 04/64] sched: Prepare for RT sleeping spin/rwlocks Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 05/64] sched: Rework the __schedule() preempt argument Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 06/64] sched: Provide schedule point for RT locks Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 07/64] sched/wake_q: Provide WAKE_Q_HEAD_INITIALIZER Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 08/64] media/atomisp: Use lockdep instead of *mutex_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 09/64] rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 10/64] rtmutex: Convert macros to inlines Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 11/64] rtmutex: Switch to try_cmpxchg() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 12/64] rtmutex: Split API and implementation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 13/64] rtmutex: Split out the inner parts of struct rtmutex Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 14/64] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_slowlock_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 15/64] rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_base_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-08 20:41 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2021-08-09 10:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 16/64] locking: Add base code for RT rw_semaphore and rwlock Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 17/64] locking/rwsem: Add rtmutex based R/W semaphore implementation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 18/64] locking/rtmutex: Add wake_state to rt_mutex_waiter Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 19/64] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_wake_q and helpers Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 20/64] locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex_wake_q_head Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 21/64] locking/rtmutex: Prepare RT rt_mutex_wake_q for RT locks Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 22/64] locking/rtmutex: Guard regular sleeping locks specific functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 23/64] locking/spinlock: Split the lock types header Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 24/64] locking/rtmutex: Prevent future include recursion hell Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 25/64] locking/lockdep: Reduce includes in debug_locks.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 26/64] rbtree: Split out the rbtree type definitions Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 27/64] locking/rtmutex: Include only rbtree types Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 28/64] locking/spinlock: Provide RT specific spinlock type Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 29/64] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant header Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 30/64] locking/rtmutex: Provide the spin/rwlock core lock function Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 31/64] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 32/64] locking/rwlock: " Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 33/64] locking/mutex: Consolidate core headers Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 34/64] locking/mutex: Move waiter to core header Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 35/64] locking/ww_mutex: Move ww_mutex declarations into ww_mutex.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 36/64] locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock raw Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 37/64] locking/ww_mutex: Simplify lockdep annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 38/64] locking/ww_mutex: Gather mutex_waiter initialization Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 39/64] locking/ww_mutex: Split up ww_mutex_unlock() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 40/64] locking/ww_mutex: Split W/W implementation logic Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 41/64] locking/ww_mutex: Remove __sched annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 42/64] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract waiter iteration Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 43/64] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract waiter enqueueing Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 44/64] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract mutex accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 45/64] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract mutex types Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 46/64] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract internal lock access Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 47/64] locking/ww_mutex: Implement rt_mutex accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 48/64] locking/ww_mutex: Add RT priority to W/W order Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-06 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-06 11:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 49/64] locking/ww_mutex: Add rt_mutex based lock type and accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 50/64] locking/rtmutex: Extend the rtmutex core to support ww_mutex Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-06 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-06 11:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-06 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-07 20:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 51/64] locking/ww_mutex: Implement rtmutex based ww_mutex API functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 52/64] locking/rtmutex: Add mutex variant for RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 53/64] lib/test_lockup: Adapt to changed variables Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 54/64] futex: Validate waiter correctly in futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 56/64] futex: Correct the number of requeued waiters for PI Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-08 17:05 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2021-08-09 8:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-09 10:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 57/64] futex: Restructure futex_requeue() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 58/64] futex: Clarify comment in futex_requeue() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-08 18:43 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2021-08-09 8:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [patch V3 59/64] futex: Simplify handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:14 ` [patch V3 60/64] futex: Prevent requeue_pi() lock nesting issue on RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:14 ` [patch V3 61/64] rtmutex: Prevent lockdep false positive with PI futexes Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:14 ` [patch V3 62/64] preempt: Adjust PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET for RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:14 ` [patch V3 63/64] locking/rtmutex: Implement equal priority lock stealing Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 15:14 ` [patch V3 64/64] locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-09 20:28 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210805153955.997745091@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).