From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAF4C4320A for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B646112F for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237438AbhHERLX (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:11:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]:33356 "EHLO mail-ej1-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231359AbhHERLV (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:11:21 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id hs10so10850343ejc.0; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:11:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yqeDSob7HIuOI4ueZc+RMNusQFLNaSctLWi/bXqPb8c=; b=AKd1MQUlaaExiFx2Ij7zczLzav2E/v7K6JBn72NFM4Rby5eU7NN/hdTRQD9G6J6kmR UkCo7qfmKSTHr8El3xcOCoEADxeld1eCFBe4uw6XoLz5CpYdX1pYJ+g/u1qUxdN7IXpE UgghEMSnmOhslCGJuSJGc5iEnKn3V3PIRPYG+Dmzggn2VOtPqm8slyJ9XVorT61sGwZ8 eDC2TAwknzW//3E3TP4FmPIzoAqqXxpq4T69sCFHMhcFVsxLgyQijFgL2L7DP4Tcg4i1 pZOQJBB9BvRrj9dE5XCpUJKeZ1IE0PvT4CzxWX0hyb9yjE8mRGvLgNemDCvsTDQ7P7Ad OmzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JnWxRRVZikvr3ehPVpW7BHcOG45qY4eKRZP3G6EH1YYR+qAml li7opgSTQ5AYiYLlJB2mMh+9ukegDQcrUA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOt7h8Ts/rtwH8i//E2eVSSs7njgwdY/EGwSJjuTh+ygS+TwV1EU8xqN6BuKXTaUGjvIbWBA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:31cf:: with SMTP id f15mr5978445ejf.272.1628183465438; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msft-t490s.fritz.box (host-80-116-27-227.retail.telecomitalia.it. [80.116.27.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm2592655edi.32.2021.08.05.10.11.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:11:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Matteo Croce To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Maxime Coquelin , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFT net-next 0/2] stmmac: recycle SKB Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 19:10:59 +0200 Message-Id: <20210805171101.13776-1-mcroce@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Matteo Croce I have two patches to enable SKB recycling in stmmac. Unfortunately the only stmmac hardware I have behave very bad, so I can't do decent performance tests. Can I get some feedback for this series? Matteo Croce (2): stmmac: use build_skb() stmmac: skb recycling drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.31.1