From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "quanyang.wang" <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com>,
Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-zynq-qspi: use wait_for_completion_timeout to make zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op not interruptible
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:47:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210806004751.GU26252@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e639bfc1-ce6f-c5d3-6412-70d03706127d@windriver.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 838 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 08:41:41AM +0800, quanyang.wang wrote:
> ping.
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-30 3:17 [PATCH] spi: spi-zynq-qspi: use wait_for_completion_timeout to make zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op not interruptible quanyang.wang
2021-08-06 0:41 ` quanyang.wang
2021-08-06 0:47 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210806004751.GU26252@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com \
--cc=quanyang.wang@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).