On 05.08.2021 22:12:18, Dario Binacchi wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h > > > index 8fe7e2138620..fc499a70b797 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h > > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h > > > +static inline u8 c_can_get_tx_free(const struct c_can_tx_ring *ring) > > > +{ > > > + return ring->obj_num - (ring->head - ring->tail); > > > +} > > > + > > > #endif /* C_CAN_H */ > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c > > > index 451ac9a9586a..4c061fef002c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c > > > @@ -427,20 +427,6 @@ static void c_can_setup_receive_object(struct net_device *dev, int iface, > > > c_can_object_put(dev, iface, obj, IF_COMM_RCV_SETUP); > > > } > > > > > > -static u8 c_can_get_tx_free(const struct c_can_tx_ring *ring) > > > -{ > > > - u8 head = c_can_get_tx_head(ring); > > > - u8 tail = c_can_get_tx_tail(ring); > > > - > > > - /* This is not a FIFO. C/D_CAN sends out the buffers > > > - * prioritized. The lowest buffer number wins. > > > - */ > > > - if (head < tail) > > > - return 0; > > > - > > > - return ring->obj_num - head; > > > -} > > > - > > > > Can you move that change into patch 3? > > Patch 3 adds the ring transmission algorithm without compromising the > message transmission order. This is not a FIFO. Right, thanks! > C/D_CAN controller sends out the buffers prioritized. The lowest > buffer number wins, so moving the change into patch 3 may not > guarantee the transmission order. In patch 3, however, I will move > c_can_get_tx_free() from c_can_main.c to c_can.h, so that in patch 4 > it will be clearer how the routine has changed. The updated patch looks much nicer now, thanks! Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |