From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6630CC4338F for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E364600D4 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244535AbhHFIXH (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 04:23:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51104 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243890AbhHFITy (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 04:19:54 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CF5B611EF; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:19:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1628237978; bh=O306JDF6f3bDg/11RMNAQRPYsUftC0y+IZIZX4/g/pk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=s4KsOZznLj4ul9yL167qbrDHn8MvKIZ2XKsyb/CtP2oNm5AXbP5/NX/Au3rEZEfJ8 Rk7pRFx1EwP5MhC+dnz5D8/74O00gh5oZuYT+SXfDnNnr43tkgULvWURALR7Ap1yHN qu3OGnmNTOkNucHsktFlQsZmJiz0wBk+R7+XNWGg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrei Matei , Alexei Starovoitov , Ovidiu Panait Subject: [PATCH 5.10 26/30] selftest/bpf: Adjust expected verifier errors Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:17:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20210806081114.013548851@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210806081113.126861800@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210806081113.126861800@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Andrei Matei commit a680cb3d8e3f4f84205720b90c926579d04eedb6 upstream The verifier errors around stack accesses have changed slightly in the previous commit (generally for the better). Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210207011027.676572-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c | 2 - tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 4 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/const_or.c | 4 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c | 12 +++--- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/int_ptr.c | 6 +-- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_stack.c | 10 ++--- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c | 22 ++++++----- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c | 2 - tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c | 16 ++++---- 9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, 8, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid stack", + .errstr = "invalid write to stack", .result = REJECT, }, { --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c @@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 23 }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid read from stack off -16+0 size 8", + .errstr = "invalid read from stack R7 off=-16 size=8", }, { "calls: two calls that receive map_value via arg=ptr_stack_of_caller. test1", @@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 6 }, - .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -8+0 size 8", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R2 off -8+0 size 8", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, }, --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/const_or.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/const_or.c @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-48 access_size=58", + .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R1 off=-48 size=58", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-48 access_size=58", + .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R1 off=-48 size=58", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -64+0 size 64", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R1 off -64+0 size 64", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-64 access_size=65", + .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R1 off=-64 size=65", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-64 access_size=65", + .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R1 off=-64 size=65", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-64 access_size=65", + .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R1 off=-64 size=65", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -64+0 size 64", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R1 off -64+0 size 64", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -64+32 size 64", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R1 off -64+32 size 64", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/int_ptr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/int_ptr.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ }, .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL, - .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -16+0 size 8", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R4 off -16+0 size 8", }, { "ARG_PTR_TO_LONG half-uninitialized", @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ }, .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL, - .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -16+4 size 8", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R4 off -16+4 size 8", }, { "ARG_PTR_TO_LONG misaligned", @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ }, .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R4 off=-4 access_size=8", + .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R4 off=-4 size=8", }, { "ARG_PTR_TO_LONG initialized", --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_stack.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_stack.c @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid read from stack off -8+0 size 8", + .errstr = "invalid read from stack R6 off=-8 size=8", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R3", + .errstr = "invalid zero-sized read", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-513 access_size=8", + .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R3 off=-513 size=8", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-1 access_size=8", + .errstr = "invalid indirect access to stack R3 off=-1 size=8", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-512 access_size=0", + .errstr = "invalid zero-sized read", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack off=-79992 size=8", + .errstr = "invalid write to stack R1 off=-79992 size=8", .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", }, { @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack off=0 size=8", + .errstr = "invalid write to stack R1 off=0 size=8", }, { "PTR_TO_STACK check high 1", @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", - .errstr = "invalid stack off=0 size=1", + .errstr = "invalid write to stack R1 off=0 size=1", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -119,7 +119,8 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack off", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", + .errstr = "invalid write to stack R1", }, { "PTR_TO_STACK check high 6", @@ -131,7 +132,8 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack off", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", + .errstr = "invalid write to stack", }, { "PTR_TO_STACK check high 7", @@ -183,7 +185,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", - .errstr = "invalid stack off=-513 size=1", + .errstr = "invalid write to stack R1 off=-513 size=1", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -208,7 +210,8 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack off", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", + .errstr = "invalid write to stack", }, { "PTR_TO_STACK check low 6", @@ -220,7 +223,8 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack off", + .errstr = "invalid write to stack", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", }, { "PTR_TO_STACK check low 7", @@ -292,7 +296,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "invalid stack off=0 size=1", + .errstr_unpriv = "invalid write to stack R1 off=0 size=1", .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 42, }, --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "invalid indirect read from stack off -8+0 size 8", + .errstr_unpriv = "invalid indirect read from stack R2 off -8+0 size 8", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, }, { - "variable-offset stack access", + "variable-offset stack read, priv vs unpriv", .insns = { /* Fill the top 8 bytes of the stack */ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "R4 unbounded indirect variable offset stack access", + .errstr = "invalid unbounded variable-offset indirect access to stack R4", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS, }, @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 5 }, - .errstr = "R2 max value is outside of stack bound", + .errstr = "invalid variable-offset indirect access to stack R2", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, }, @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 5 }, - .errstr = "R2 min value is outside of stack bound", + .errstr = "invalid variable-offset indirect access to stack R2", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, }, @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 5 }, - .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack var_off", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R2 var_off", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, }, @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 5 }, - .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack var_off", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R2 var_off", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, }, @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 6 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R2 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range, prohibited for !root", + .errstr_unpriv = "R2 variable stack access prohibited for !root", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack var_off", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack R4 var_off", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS, },