From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> To: marcel@holtmann.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com, luiz.dentz@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com Cc: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: [PATCH v6 3/6] Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in SCO Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:14:07 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210810041410.142035-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210810041410.142035-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Since sco_sock_timeout is now scheduled using delayed work, it is no longer run in SOFTIRQ context. Hence bh_lock_sock is no longer necessary in SCO to synchronise between user contexts and SOFTIRQ processing. As such, calls to bh_lock_sock should be replaced with lock_sock to synchronize with other concurrent processes that use lock_sock. Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> --- net/bluetooth/sco.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bluetooth/sco.c b/net/bluetooth/sco.c index 94a3aa686556..68b51e321e82 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/sco.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/sco.c @@ -93,10 +93,10 @@ static void sco_sock_timeout(struct work_struct *work) BT_DBG("sock %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state); - bh_lock_sock(sk); + lock_sock(sk); sk->sk_err = ETIMEDOUT; sk->sk_state_change(sk); - bh_unlock_sock(sk); + release_sock(sk); sco_sock_kill(sk); sock_put(sk); @@ -193,10 +193,10 @@ static void sco_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err) if (sk) { sock_hold(sk); - bh_lock_sock(sk); + lock_sock(sk); sco_sock_clear_timer(sk); sco_chan_del(sk, err); - bh_unlock_sock(sk); + release_sock(sk); sco_sock_kill(sk); sock_put(sk); @@ -1105,10 +1105,10 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn) if (sk) { sco_sock_clear_timer(sk); - bh_lock_sock(sk); + lock_sock(sk); sk->sk_state = BT_CONNECTED; sk->sk_state_change(sk); - bh_unlock_sock(sk); + release_sock(sk); } else { sco_conn_lock(conn); @@ -1123,12 +1123,12 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn) return; } - bh_lock_sock(parent); + lock_sock(parent); sk = sco_sock_alloc(sock_net(parent), NULL, BTPROTO_SCO, GFP_ATOMIC, 0); if (!sk) { - bh_unlock_sock(parent); + release_sock(parent); sco_conn_unlock(conn); return; } @@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn) /* Wake up parent */ parent->sk_data_ready(parent); - bh_unlock_sock(parent); + release_sock(parent); sco_conn_unlock(conn); } -- 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-10 4:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-10 4:14 [PATCH v6 0/6] Bluetooth: fix locking and socket killing in SCO and RFCOMM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 2021-08-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] Bluetooth: schedule SCO timeouts with delayed_work Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 2021-09-02 19:17 ` Eric Dumazet 2021-09-02 19:32 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 2021-09-02 21:41 ` Eric Dumazet 2021-09-02 22:53 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 2021-09-02 23:05 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 2021-09-02 23:42 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz 2021-09-03 3:17 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 2021-08-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] Bluetooth: avoid circular locks in sco_sock_connect Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 2021-08-10 4:14 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi [this message] 2021-08-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] Bluetooth: serialize calls to sco_sock_{set,clear}_timer Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 2021-08-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in RFCOMM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 2021-08-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] Bluetooth: fix repeated calls to sco_sock_kill Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210810041410.142035-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \ --to=desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \ --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in SCO' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).