From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: [patch V4 14/68] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_slowlock_locked()
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:22:47 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210811121414.980426677@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210811120348.855823694@linutronix.de
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Split the inner workings of rt_mutex_slowlock() out into a separate
function which can be reused by the upcoming RT lock substitutions,
e.g. for rw_semaphores.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V2: Add the dropped debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter() - Valentin
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c | 2
2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
---
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ static void __sched remove_waiter(struct
}
/**
- * __rt_mutex_slowlock() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop
+ * rt_mutex_slowlock_block() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop
* @lock: the rt_mutex to take
* @state: the state the task should block in (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
* or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
@@ -1115,10 +1115,10 @@ static void __sched remove_waiter(struct
*
* Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled
*/
-static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
- unsigned int state,
- struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
- struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock_block(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+ unsigned int state,
+ struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -1168,52 +1168,37 @@ static void __sched rt_mutex_handle_dead
}
}
-/*
- * Slow path lock function:
+/**
+ * __rt_mutex_slowlock - Locking slowpath invoked with lock::wait_lock held
+ * @lock: The rtmutex to block lock
+ * @state: The task state for sleeping
+ * @chwalk: Indicator whether full or partial chainwalk is requested
+ * @waiter: Initializer waiter for blocking
*/
-static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
- unsigned int state,
- struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
- enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
+static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+ unsigned int state,
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
- struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
- unsigned long flags;
- int ret = 0;
-
- rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter);
+ int ret;
- /*
- * Technically we could use raw_spin_[un]lock_irq() here, but this can
- * be called in early boot if the cmpxchg() fast path is disabled
- * (debug, no architecture support). In this case we will acquire the
- * rtmutex with lock->wait_lock held. But we cannot unconditionally
- * enable interrupts in that early boot case. So we need to use the
- * irqsave/restore variants.
- */
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
/* Try to acquire the lock again: */
- if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) {
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+ if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL))
return 0;
- }
set_current_state(state);
- /* Setup the timer, when timeout != NULL */
- if (unlikely(timeout))
- hrtimer_start_expires(&timeout->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
-
- ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, chwalk);
+ ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, current, chwalk);
if (likely(!ret))
- /* sleep on the mutex */
- ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter);
+ ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, state, NULL, waiter);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
- rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
+ remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
+ rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, waiter);
}
/*
@@ -1221,14 +1206,45 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(str
* unconditionally. We might have to fix that up.
*/
fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+ return ret;
+}
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+static inline int __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+ unsigned int state)
+{
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
+ int ret;
- /* Remove pending timer: */
- if (unlikely(timeout))
- hrtimer_cancel(&timeout->timer);
+ rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter);
+
+ ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, &waiter);
debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * rt_mutex_slowlock - Locking slowpath invoked when fast path fails
+ * @lock: The rtmutex to block lock
+ * @state: The task state for sleeping
+ */
+static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+ unsigned int state)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Technically we could use raw_spin_[un]lock_irq() here, but this can
+ * be called in early boot if the cmpxchg() fast path is disabled
+ * (debug, no architecture support). In this case we will acquire the
+ * rtmutex with lock->wait_lock held. But we cannot unconditionally
+ * enable interrupts in that early boot case. So we need to use the
+ * irqsave/restore variants.
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+ ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, state);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -1239,7 +1255,7 @@ static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lo
if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current)))
return 0;
- return rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
+ return rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state);
}
static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(str
raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
/* sleep on the mutex */
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
+ ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
/*
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
* have to fix that up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-11 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-11 12:22 [patch V4 00/68] locking, sched: The PREEMPT-RT locking infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 01/68] sched: Split out the wakeup state check Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 02/68] sched: Introduce TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 03/68] sched: Reorganize current::__state helpers Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 04/68] sched: Prepare for RT sleeping spin/rwlocks Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 05/68] sched: Rework the __schedule() preempt argument Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 06/68] sched: Provide schedule point for RT locks Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 07/68] sched/wake_q: Provide WAKE_Q_HEAD_INITIALIZER Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 08/68] media/atomisp: Use lockdep instead of *mutex_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 09/68] rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 10/68] rtmutex: Convert macros to inlines Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 11/68] rtmutex: Switch to try_cmpxchg() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 12/68] rtmutex: Split API and implementation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 13/68] rtmutex: Split out the inner parts of struct rtmutex Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 15/68] rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_base_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 16/68] locking: Add base code for RT rw_semaphore and rwlock Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 17/68] locking/rwsem: Add rtmutex based R/W semaphore implementation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 18/68] locking/rtmutex: Add wake_state to rt_mutex_waiter Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 19/68] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_wake_q and helpers Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 20/68] locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex_wake_q_head Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 21/68] locking/rtmutex: Prepare RT rt_mutex_wake_q for RT locks Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 22/68] locking/rtmutex: Guard regular sleeping locks specific functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:22 ` [patch V4 23/68] locking/spinlock: Split the lock types header Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 24/68] locking/rtmutex: Prevent future include recursion hell Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 25/68] locking/lockdep: Reduce includes in debug_locks.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 26/68] rbtree: Split out the rbtree type definitions Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 27/68] locking/rtmutex: Include only rbtree types Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 28/68] locking/spinlock: Provide RT specific spinlock type Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 29/68] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant header Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 30/68] locking/rtmutex: Provide the spin/rwlock core lock function Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 31/68] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 32/68] locking/rwlock: " Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 33/68] locking/rtmutex: Squash !RT tasks to DEFAULT_PRIO Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 34/68] locking/mutex: Consolidate core headers Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 35/68] locking/mutex: Move waiter to core header Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 36/68] locking/ww_mutex: Move ww_mutex declarations into ww_mutex.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 37/68] locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock raw Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 38/68] locking/ww_mutex: Simplify lockdep annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 39/68] locking/ww_mutex: Gather mutex_waiter initialization Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 40/68] locking/ww_mutex: Split up ww_mutex_unlock() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 41/68] locking/ww_mutex: Split W/W implementation logic Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 42/68] locking/ww_mutex: Remove __sched annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 43/68] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract waiter iteration Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 44/68] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract waiter enqueueing Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 45/68] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract mutex accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 46/68] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract mutex types Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 47/68] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract internal lock access Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 48/68] locking/ww_mutex: Implement rt_mutex accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 49/68] locking/ww_mutex: Add RT priority to W/W order Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 50/68] locking/ww_mutex: Add rt_mutex based lock type and accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 51/68] locking/rtmutex: Extend the rtmutex core to support ww_mutex Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 52/68] locking/ww_mutex: Implement rtmutex based ww_mutex API functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 53/68] locking/rtmutex: Add mutex variant for RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 54/68] lib/test_lockup: Adapt to changed variables Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 55/68] futex: Validate waiter correctly in futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 56/68] futex: Cleanup stale comments Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 57/68] futex: Clarify futex_requeue() PI handling Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 58/68] futex: Remove bogus condition for requeue PI Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 59/68] futex: Correct the number of requeued waiters for PI Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 60/68] futex: Restructure futex_requeue() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 61/68] futex: Clarify comment in futex_requeue() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 62/68] futex: Reorder sanity checks " Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 63/68] futex: Simplify handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 64/68] futex: Prevent requeue_pi() lock nesting issue on RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 65/68] rtmutex: Prevent lockdep false positive with PI futexes Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 66/68] preempt: Adjust PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET for RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 67/68] locking/rtmutex: Implement equal priority lock stealing Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-11 12:23 ` [patch V4 68/68] locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-13 8:05 ` [patch V4 69/68] locking/rt: Add missing __might_sleep() to spin/rwlocks Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210811121414.980426677@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).