linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 06/11] bpf, selftests: Adjust few selftest outcomes wrt unreachable code
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:07:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210813150520.278492879@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210813150520.072304554@linuxfoundation.org>

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

commit 973377ffe8148180b2651825b92ae91988141b05 upstream.

In almost all cases from test_verifier that have been changed in here, we've
had an unreachable path with a load from a register which has an invalid
address on purpose. This was basically to make sure that we never walk this
path and to have the verifier complain if it would otherwise. Change it to
match on the right error for unprivileged given we now test these paths
under speculative execution.

There's one case where we match on exact # of insns_processed. Due to the
extra path, this will of course mismatch on unprivileged. Thus, restrict the
test->insn_processed check to privileged-only.

In one other case, we result in a 'pointer comparison prohibited' error. This
is similarly due to verifying an 'invalid' branch where we end up with a value
pointer on one side of the comparison.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[OP: ignore changes to tests that do not exist in 4.19]
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -2792,6 +2792,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
+		.errstr_unpriv = "R7 invalid mem access 'inv'",
+		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 		.result = ACCEPT,
 		.retval = 0,
 	},



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-13 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-13 15:07 [PATCH 4.19 00/11] 4.19.204-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 15:07 ` [PATCH 4.19 01/11] KVM: SVM: Fix off-by-one indexing when nullifying last used SEV VMCB Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 15:07 ` [PATCH 4.19 02/11] tracing: Reject string operand in the histogram expression Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 15:07 ` [PATCH 4.19 03/11] bpf: Inherit expanded/patched seen count from old aux data Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 15:07 ` [PATCH 4.19 04/11] bpf: Do not mark insn as seen under speculative path verification Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 15:07 ` [PATCH 4.19 05/11] bpf: Fix leakage under speculation on mispredicted branches Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 15:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-08-13 15:07 ` [PATCH 4.19 07/11] KVM: X86: MMU: Use the correct inherited permissions to get shadow page Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 15:07 ` [PATCH 4.19 08/11] USB:ehci:fix Kunpeng920 ehci hardware problem Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 15:07 ` [PATCH 4.19 09/11] ppp: Fix generating ppp unit id when ifname is not specified Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 15:07 ` [PATCH 4.19 10/11] ovl: prevent private clone if bind mount is not allowed Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 15:07 ` [PATCH 4.19 11/11] net: xilinx_emaclite: Do not print real IOMEM pointer Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-13 23:25 ` [PATCH 4.19 00/11] 4.19.204-rc1 review Shuah Khan
2021-08-14 11:09 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2021-08-14 11:42 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-08-14 18:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-08-15 19:50 ` Pavel Machek
2021-08-16  3:09 ` Samuel Zou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210813150520.278492879@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ovidiu.panait@windriver.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).